In this thesis I address the problem of the commentators' interpretations regarding Hume's philosophy of mind. Precisely what theory of mind Hume articulates is the subject of much debate among the commentators although a definitive view has, as yet, not been attributed to Hume. The issue Is, of course, complicated by the fact that Hume says so many things about mind, and these numerous and often conflictlng assertions entirely elude the commentators' endeavours to systematize them into a coherent theory. Through and examination of what I take to be three representative readings, viz., those of R.F. Anderson, C.V. Salmon, and John Bricke, I show that each interpretation cannot but fail as a systematization of Hume's views about mind into a theory, since a positive reading of Hume's philosophy of mind cannot be accomplished without either abandoning aspects of Hume's metaphysics, acknowledging that a preferred interpretation Is unable to account for certain views that Hume propounds, alleging a deeply rooted inconsistency, or all of these possibilities together. Why Hume's work eludes the commentators In this way is a problem that is examined by considering his intentions in A Treatise of Human Nature (and the Enquiries); that is, more specifically, the aim of his sceptical critique of metaphysical concepts and doctrines, his conviction as an epistemologist that our knowledqe claims are confined to the realm of experience, and his project, viz., to set the sciences on a new foundation. The whole discussion calls attention to the difficulty that is encountered in the interpretation of Hume's views about mind and its importance, for Hume scholarship, lies precisely in the endeavour to bring these problems to light via a critique of the accepted readings. / Thesis / Master of Arts (MA)

En esta investigación buscaremos analizar y contrastar las diferentes opiniones de los narradores y comentaristas peruanos de uno de los medios de transmisión de deportes con el desarrollo de las clasificatorias del Mundial de Rusia 2018. De esta manera buscaremos identificar los cambios que sufrieron estas narrativas por diferentes aspectos. Esto se realizará analizando comentarios durante el desarrollo del partido y comentarios sobre el equipo. También se analizará la narración de jugadas claves, y comentarios post partido. Debido a que encontraremos una relación entre los comentarios, opiniones y los partidos. Analizaremos 3 partidos claves escogidos debido a su relevancia e importancia para la clasificatoria. De esta manera podremos observar la transformación que sufrieron las narrativas a lo largo del proceso de clasificación. / In this research we will seek to analyze and contrast the different opinions of the Peruvian narrators and commentators of one of the sports broadcasting media with the development of the 2018 World Cup in Russia qualifiers. In this way we will seek to identify the changes that these narrators underwent by different aspects. This will be done by analyzing comments during the game and comments about the team. The narration of key plays, and post-match comments will also be analyzed. Because we will find a relationship between comments, opinions and matches. We will analyze 3 key matches chosen due to their relevance and importance for qualifying. In this way we will be able to observe the transformation that the narratives underwent throughout the classification process. / Trabajo de investigación