Magistro darbe yra atlikta teorinė komandos ir komandinio darbo sampratos analizė, atskleistas komandinio darbo teisinis reglamentavimas, komandinio darbo organizavimo ypatumai, komandos ir komandinio darbo svarba tenkinant specialiuosius ugdymo(si) poreikius. Iškelta hipotezė, jog tikėtina, kad, tenkinant specialiuosius ugdymo(si) poreikius, formaliai reglamentuojamas darbas komandoje, tačiau realiai ugdymo proceso dalyviai dirba, orientuodamiesi į individualias veiklas. Tyrimo tikslas – įvertinti komandinio darbo organizavimo ypatumus bendrojo lavinimo mokykloje, tenkinant mokinių (vaikų) specialiuosius ugdymo(si) poreikius. Tyrimo objektas – komandinis darbas ugdant specialiųjų poreikių vaikus bendrojo lavinimo mokykloje. Siekiant patikrinti iškeltą hipotezę, buvo atliekamas kiekybinis tyrimas anketinės apklausos metodu. Tyrimo imtis – 182 respondentai, iš jų 117 pedagogų ir 65 tėvai, auginantys vaiką, turintį specialiųjų ugdymo(si) poreikių. Kiekybinis tyrimas buvo atliekamas rytų Lietuvos bendrojo lavinimo mokyklose 2009/2010 m.m. Gautiems tyrimo duomenims apdoroti buvo taikoma statistinė tyrimo duomenų analizė (deskriptyvinės ir daugiamatės statistikos metodai). Empirinėje magistro darbo dalyje nagrinėjami komandinio darbo ypatumai specialiųjų ugdymo(si) poreikių tenkinimo kontekste. Remiantis gautais duomenimis, atskleidžiama pedagogų ir tėvų nuomonė apie vyraujančią atmosferą komandoje, respondentų požiūrį į komandinį darbą, komandinio darbo būdus bei organizavimą. ... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / The concept of team and teamwork is analyzed theoretically, the legal regulation of teamwork, the peculiarities of teamwork organization as well as the importance of the team and teamwork meeting special educational needs is revealed in the master’s thesis. The hypothesis of the work is that it is probable that in meeting special educational needs, the work in a team is regulate nominally, but the parties of the education process work orients to individually activities realistically. The aim of the research is to evaluate the peculiarities of teamwork organization meeting special educational needs of the schoolchildren in comprehensive school. The object of the research is the teamwork in educating the children who have special needs in comprehensive school. In order to verify the hypothesis of the research, the quantitative analysis using the questionnaire method was carried out. The amount of research is 182 respondents – 117 pedagogues and 65 parents who grow a child having special educational needs. The statistical data analysis (the methods of descriptive and multivariate statistics) was used to generalize the data of the research. The peculiarities of teamwork in the context meeting special educational needs are analyzed in the empirical part of the paper. The opinion of the pedagogues and parents on the team atmosphere, the attitude of respondents towards the teamwork, the methods and organization of the teamwork is revealed on the basis of the data received. The... [to full text]

XX a. viduryje Vakarų Europoje ir Šiaurės Amerikoje prasidėję socialiniai pokyčiai ir naujos neįgaliųjų ugdymo ir socialinės integracijos teorijos turėjo įtakos ir kuriamai Lietuvos švietimo koncepcijai. Lietuvos švietimo politika grindžiama Vakarų Europos priimtais humaniškumo, demokratiškumo principais, normalizacijos, integracijos idėjomis. R. Rose (2003) teigimu, viso pasaulio vyriausybės, pasirašydamos Salamankoje priimtus dokumentus: ataskaitą ir veiksmų planą specialiųjų poreikių vaikų integracijai vystyti (UNESKO 1994), pasižadėjo stengtis sukurti kuo nešališkesnę švietimo sistemą, apimančią geresnį moksleivių, dar dažnai nustumiamų į šalį, ugdymą. Nors ir buvo padaryti dideli žingsniai vaikų iškritimui iš mokyklos įveikti, dar vis pasitaiko atvejų, kai didelis skaičius vaikų pasijunta už tinkamo (atitinkančio vaiko gebėjimus) ugdymo ribų. Įvairūs tyrimai rodo, kad nesėkmingo mokymosi mastai įvairiose švietimo sistemose, tame tarpe ir Lietuvoje, yra ryškūs (Barkauskaitė M, 2003). Aktualiausia švietimo ir ugdymo problema ES ir Lietuvoje įvardijamas kokybiškas visų švietimas. Kiekvieno vaiko „iškritimas” iš mokyklos yra netektis valstybei, reikalaujanti papildomų investicijų. Sprendžiant šį uždavinį, specialiųjų ugdymo(si) poreikių (SUP) savalaikiškas identifikavimas tampa itin aktualus, nes šalina nesėkmingo mokymosi, neigiamai veikiančio vaiko asmenybę, priežastis, sudaro galimybes mokytis pagal individualius gebėjimus, garantuoja „nubyrėjimo” iš mokyklos prevenciją... [to full text] / The subject of master’s work – Identification of special (self)-educational needs: the aspect of special development commission’s activity. The subject is relevant because the different researches show that the scale of unsuccessful learning in different educational systems including Lithuania is telling. Dealing with educational today’s problems the well-timed identification of special (self)-educational needs (SEN) is becoming especially talking point because it eliminates the reasons of unlucky learning, which negatively affects to the child’s personality, helps to solve the most actual educational problem in EU and Lithuania – the qualitative development of all schoolchildren and guarantees the prevention of dropping out of schools. The schools must be ready to envisage the special needs of pupils, to consider the individual abilities of children and organize the service of social, psychological, special pedagogical help. The purpose of research – to show the situation (problems, reasons) of identification of special (self)-educational needs of schoolchildren in the commissions of special development and formulate the recommendations for improving this work. The purpose is realized by these goals: a) to discover the survey of development of institutions that identify SEN and the conception of special development commission (SDC), b) to discuss the conception of special (self)-educational needs and their identification as well as the matter of activity, c) to estimate... [to full text]

Doctor Educationis / The aim of this research was to establish how successfully schools in the foundation phase (Grades 1 and 2), where training and implementation of OBE has been completed, were able to reach the goals of OBE. As part of the broader goal, this investigation attempted to clarify whether the inclusionary approach of OBE was working in primary schools in the foundation phase based on its central premise that all students can learn and succeed, but not on the same day and in the same way. More specifically, this investigation attempted to establish: (i) How successfully had the 66 specific outcomes been implemented in Grade 1 and Grade 2? (ii) What was the level of success of implementation in the different learning areas? (iii) What was the level of success in the implementation of mastery learning? (iv) How many learners had been moved from special education sites to regular education sites? (v) Did schools have the resources to deal with diversity? (vi) Had there been sufficient human resource development to ensure teachers had been trained to deal with diversity? And (vii) Did teachers feel they could teach all learners? In order to arrive at the above-mentioned aim, this study included a survey in a sample of primary schools in the Western Cape. A survey was conducted in 108 primary schools which constitutes 10% of the primary schools in the Western Cape Province. The 108 schools were chosen based on socio-economic and rural/urban considerations. Schools were identified on the following basis: 25% of the poorly resourced schools in urban areas, 25% of the well resourced schools in urban areas, 25% of the poorly resourced schools in the rural areas and 25% of the well resourced schools in the rural areas. Regarding the results of the study concerning the specific outcomes and learning areas, in grade one and grade two results relating to the specific outcomes and learning areas revealed that the majority of teachers rated the level of success at average and below. For example, the range of those teachers who indicated average and below in grade 1 was from 41.03% to 81.96% and in grade 2 from 43.56% to 79.50%. In most learning areas, the number of teachers who In Grades one and two, both language, literacy and communication and indicated average and below was substantial, for example, in grade 1; Natural Sciences, 81.96%, Technology, 78.43%, Economics and Management Sciences, 72.87%. Similar results have been found in Grade 2, for example; Natural Sciences, 79,50%, indicated average and below was substantial, for example, in grade 1 levels across geographical and socio-economic contexts. For example, the urban poor had the lowest results in Grade two and the urban rich experienced the lowest results in Grade one. This suggests that the implementation of OBE was generally poor. The poor results of the urban rich in relation to the other categories suggest that the implementation of OBE has failed in affluent urban schools yet it is normally expected that affluent schools would perform well in relation to the other categories. This is another indication that the implementation of OBE has generally been poor.