Grounds for the topic of my thesis are connected with approved Amendment Act of Community Interest Societies. The aim of the work is to explain reasons that made the legislation power approve the amendment (mentioned above), specification of the most essential features of legal entities of a non-profit sphere, and usage of comparative levelling of the original statutory text with the actual legal regulations. The thesis is devided into 8 chapters and results from the basic characteristics of legal entities of the non-profit sphere in relation to a short discursion respecting their historical evolution. Attention is paid to general definition signs of these legal entities. The work focuses on legal status a Community Interest Society in the context of the Czech Legal Order. Great attention is paid to the Amendment Act of a Community Interest Society, especially with respect to the newly constructed conception in the area of authorities status of Community Interest Society and alignment of their acticity. The thesis deals with procedural process during foundation and liquidation of that kind of non-governmental organization and activities that are typical of the Community Interest Society. The merits of the thesis is characteristic of use of comparative view of the original statutory text concerning...

L'intérêt communautaire apparaît dans le droit positif lors de l'adoption de la loi « ATR » du 6 février 1992. Sa définition, rendue obligatoire par la loi du 12 juillet 1999 relative au renforcement et à la simplification de la coopération intercommunale, établit une ligne de partage entre les compétences communales et les domaines d'action communautaires. Ainsi, il traduit en droit le projet communautaire de développement sur le territoire de l'établissement public de coopération intercommunale. La détermination de l'intérêt communautaire, expression des affaires locales, constitue bien une méthode d'aménagement local. Sa détermination est l'?uvre des instances communautaires pour les communautés urbaines et d'agglomération alors que pour les communautés de communes ce sont les conseils municipaux qui se prononcent. La montée en puissance des intercommunalités affaiblit donc le principe de rattachement caractéristique des établissements publics. L'affirmation d'un véritable « niveau d'administration » pose ainsi la question de l'évolution future du statut juridique des EPCI après l'introduction du suffrage universel direct. L'intercommunalité, à la croisée des chemins, modifie en profondeur l'administration territoriale française. / Community interest appeared first through positive law in the adoption of the « ATR » law on February 6th 1992. Its definition, which was enforced by the July 12th 1999 law relative to the reinforcement and simplification of intercommunal cooperation, draws the line for the sharing of communal competence and community action domains. It therefore transforms into law the community project in development in the field of public establishment of intercommunal cooperation. Determining community interest and expressing local affairs indeed constitutes a local development method. Its determination is the work of community entreaties for urban communities and agglomerations whereas for the case of communal communities it is city councils that voice their opinion. The rise of intercommunalities therefore weakens the reattachment principle typical of public institutions. Asserting the true « level of administration » therefore brings up the question of the future evolution of the EPCI's legal status after the introduction of universal suffrage. Intercommunality is indeed at a/the crossroads and radically changes French territorial administration.