Spelling suggestions: "subject:"complexity off ontology"" "subject:"complexity oof ontology""
1 |
A framework for analysing the complexity of ontologyKazadi, Yannick Kazela 11 1900 (has links)
M. Tech. (Department of Information and Communication Technology, Faculty of Applied and Computer Sciences), Vaal University of Technology / The emergence of the Semantic Web has resulted in more and more large-scale ontologies being developed in real-world applications to represent and integrate knowledge and data in various domains. This has given rise to the problem of selection of the appropriate ontology for reuse, among the set of ontologies describing a domain. To address such problem, it is argued that the evaluation of the complexity of ontologies of a domain can assist in determining the suitable ontologies for the purpose of reuse. This study investigates existing metrics for measuring the design complexity of ontologies and implements these metrics in a framework that provides a stepwise process for evaluating the complexity of ontologies of a knowledge domain. The implementation of the framework goes through a certain number of phases including the: (1) download of 100 Biomedical ontologies from the BioPortal repository to constitute the dataset, (2) the design of a set of algorithms to compute the complexity metrics of the ontologies in the dataset including the depth of inheritance (DIP), size of the vocabulary (SOV), entropy of ontology graphs (EOG), average part length (APL) and average number of paths per class (ANP), the tree impurity (TIP), relationship richness (RR) and class richness (CR), (3) ranking of the ontologies in the dataset through the aggregation of their complexity metrics using 5 Multi-attributes Decision Making (MADM) methods, namely, Weighted Sum Method (WSM), Weighted Product Method (WPM), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Weighted Linear Combination Ranking Technique (WLCRT) and Elimination and Choice Translating Reality (ELECTRE) and (4) validation of the framework through the summary of the results of the previous phases and analysis of their impact on the issues of selection and reuse of the biomedical ontologies in the dataset. The ranking results of the study constitute important guidelines for the selection and reuse of biomedical ontologies in the dataset. Although the proposed framework in this study has been applied in the biomedical domain, it could be applied in any other domain of Semantic Web to analyze the complexity of ontologies.
|
Page generated in 0.0862 seconds