Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-02-02T11:39:12Z No. of bitstreams: 1 TeresaPaulaDeCarvalhoLeoncio_DISSERT.pdf: 9182418 bytes, checksum: 581ff78f22b5645099852f0099845b01 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-02-03T21:12:27Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 TeresaPaulaDeCarvalhoLeoncio_DISSERT.pdf: 9182418 bytes, checksum: 581ff78f22b5645099852f0099845b01 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-02-03T21:12:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TeresaPaulaDeCarvalhoLeoncio_DISSERT.pdf: 9182418 bytes, checksum: 581ff78f22b5645099852f0099845b01 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-07-29 / A escolariza??o da literatura ora privilegiou a ?nfase na caracteriza??o das escolas liter?rias e leitura dos c?nones, ora referendou a abordagem da arte pela arte, ora circunscreveu o ensino ao estudo dos g?neros liter?rios com foco no professor. Em abordagens dessa natureza, o universo de cultura e as identidades espec?ficas dos alunos n?o s?o enfatizados. Tendo isso em vista, esta disserta??o elege como objeto de estudo as pr?ticas de leitura de textos liter?rios e pr?ticas de escrita de textos liter?rios ou n?o, produzidas por 32 colaboradores (alunos e ex-alunos) na disciplina L?ngua Portuguesa e Literatura do IFRN, campus Nova Cruz, Macau e S?o Gon?alo do Amarante, no contexto do projeto de letramento ?Divulgando Leituras, Conquistando Leitores? (DLCL). Nessa dire??o, objetivamos, de modo geral, investigar de que forma as pr?ticas de leitura e escrita desenvolvidas no projeto de letramento DLCL podem construir uma comunidade de leitores/escritores em que se valorize o universo de cultura dos alunos, transformando-os em agentes de letramento liter?rios. T?nhamos como prop?sitos espec?ficos (i) apontaras pr?ticas de letramento liter?rio realizadas no projeto de letramento ?Divulgando Leituras, Conquistando Leitores? (DLCL); (ii) discutir as a??es desenvolvidas no contexto escolar para a constitui??o de uma comunidade de leitores, com foco no universo de cultura dos alunos; (iii) identificar os impactos do projeto de letramento ?Divulgando Leituras, Conquistando Leitores? na constru??o da identidade leitora e escritora de 32 colaboradores (alunos e ex-alunos) na disciplina L?ngua Portuguesa e Literatura do IFRN, campus Nova Cruz, Macau e S?o Gon?alo do Amarante. Teoricamente, esta pesquisa fundamenta-se: nos estudos de letramento (KLEIMAN, 1995; STREET, 2014), especificamente nos conceitos de Letramentos M?ltiplos (OLIVEIRA; KLEIMAN, 2008), Projetos de Letramento (KLEIMAN, 2000; OLIVEIRA, 2008; 2010a; OLIVEIRA; TINOCO; SANTOS, 2011), Comunidades de Aprendizagem (OLIVEIRA, 2010b), Letramentos Silenciados (KEY, 1998). Fundamenta-se, tamb?m, em teorias relacionadas ao texto liter?rio (COMPAGNON, 2009; TODOROV, 2009; DERRIDA, 2014, EAGLETON, 2010; ABREU, 2006; LAJOLO, 2001; COELHO, 2000; BOURDIEU, 1996) e ? atividade de leitura entendida como compartilhamento (PETIT, 2009a; 2009b, 2013), al?m de discutir os conceitos de Mem?rias Coletivas (HALBWACHS, 2006; BOSI, 2003); Cultura (WILLIAMS, 2011A; 2011B; CERTEAU, 2014) e Identidade (BAUMAN, 2005; 2013; FOUCALT, 2014; 2015; PETIT, 2009A; 2009B; 2013; HALL, 2011; LAHIRE, 2002). Metodologicamente, este estudo de natureza etnogr?fica (STREET, 2014; THOMAS, 1993; CAN?ADO, 1994; MAGALH?ES, 1994; MOITA LOPES, 1993; AGAR 2005) se insere no campo da Lingu?stica Aplicada Cr?tica (KLEIMAN, 2013; MOITA LOPES, 2006 e PENNYCOOK, 2006) e adota a abordagem qualitativa (BAUER; GASKELL, 2002; FLICK, 2004; BIBBS, 2009), com foco na Pesquisa de Fortalecimento (OLIVEIRA, 2004). A an?lise dos dados permitiu evidenciar que (i) a rela??o dos colaboradores do DLCL com a leitura liter?ria ultrapassa os limites da escolariza??o formal; (ii) o texto liter?rio faz parte da vida dos colaboradores e n?o se restringe ao ambiente escolar; (iii) o texto liter?rio pode contribuir para forma??o identit?ria de comunidades alternativas de leitores e escritores; (iv) as experi?ncias de leitura, vivenciadas no transcurso do projeto, s?o transformadoras de vidas. / The scholarization of Literature sometimes priviledged the emphasis on literary theory?s characterization, sometimes supported the art for art?s sake movement, sometimes limited the teaching to the study of literary genres with focus on the teacher. Approaches of such nature do not emphasize students? cultural universe and specific identities. Therefore, this thesis aims to analyse reading practices and production of literary texts, considering 31 collaborators? cultural universes, people who are students and former students of Portuguese and Literarute at IFRN?s Nova Cruz, Macau and Sao Goncalo do Amarante campuses, on the context of the ?Promoting Readings, Gaining Readers? (PRGR) literacy project. To achieve this goal, it was investigated how the reading and writing practices that were developed in the PRGR literacy project can build a community of readers in which students? cultural universes are valued, turning them into literacy agents, with the purpose of (i) exploring the literacy practices carried out in the ?Promoting Readings, Gaining Readers? (PRGR) literacy project; (ii) discuss the actions that were developed in schools to create a community of readers with focus on students? cultural universe; (iii) determine the PRGR literacy project?s impact towards the development of a reader and writer?s identity in 31 collaborators, who are students and former students of Portuguese and Literarute at IFRN?s Nova Cruz, Macau and Sao Goncalo do Amarantecampuses.This study is based on the following theories: literacy studies (KLEIMAN, 1995; STREET, 2014), specifically on the Multiple Literacy theory (OLIVEIRA; KLEIMAN, 2008), Literacy Projects (OLIVEIRA, 2008; 2010a; OLIVEIRA, TINOCO; SANTOS, 2011), Communities of Learning (OLIVEIRA, 2010b) and Silenced Literacy (KEY, 1998).It is also based on the literary text?s theories (COMPAGNON, 2009; TODOROV, 2009; DERRIDA, 2014; EAGLETON, 2010; ABREU, 2006; LAJOLO, 2001; COELHO, 2000; BOURDIEU, 1996) and on the Collective Memories? theories (HALBWACHS, 2006 ; BOSI, 2003); Culture (WILLIAMS, 2011A; 2011B; CERTEAU, 2014) and Identity (BAUMAN, 2005, 2013; FOUCALT, 2014; 2015; PETIT, 2009A; 2009B, 2013, HALL, 2011 e LAHIRE, 2002).Methodologically, this study, which has an etnographic nature (STREET, 2014; THOMAS, 1993; CAN?ADO, 1994; MAGALH?ES, 1994; MOITA LOPES, 1993; AGAR 2005), is situated in the Critical Applied Linguistics field (KLEIMAN, 2013; MOITA LOPES, 2006; PENNYCOOK, 2006) and adopts the qualitative approach (BAUER; GASKELL, 2002; FLICK, 2004; BIBBS, 2009), focusing on the Straightening Research (OLIVEIRA, 2004).The data analysis allowed the demonstration that (i) the collaborators? relationship with literary reading surpasses the limits of formal scholarization; (ii) the literary text is part of the collaborators? lives and is not restrained to the school environment; (iii) the literary text can contribute to the development of alternative communities of readers and writers? identities; (iv) the reading practices, experienced during the course of the project, are life-changing.