Spelling suggestions: "subject:"configurations."" "subject:"konfigurations.""
1 |
A correspondence in geometry and some properties of pseudo homochiral and pseudo heterochiral configurationsEchols, Robert Lewis Harrison. January 1929 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Virginia. / "Private edition, distributed by the University of Virginia Library, University, Virginia.
|
2 |
On the Cayley-Veronese class of configurations ...Carver, Walter Buckingham, January 1905 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--John Hopkins University. / Reprinted from the Transactions of the American mathematical society, v. 6, no. 4, October, 1905. Biography.
|
3 |
Enveloppen der Euler'schen GeradenMühlemann, F. January 1905 (has links)
Thesis--Universität Bern, 1904.
|
4 |
On the Cayley-Veronese class of configurations ...Carver, Walter Buckingham, January 1905 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--John Hopkins University. / Reprinted from the Transactions of the American mathematical society, v. 6, no. 4, October, 1905. Biography.
|
5 |
A search for configurational invariantsCyrus, Karin 20 February 2015 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
Group Embeddings of (n,k) ConfigurationsEns, Eric 31 August 2011 (has links)
An (n, k) configuration is a set of n “points” and n “lines” such that each point lies on k lines and each line contains k points. Motivated by the geometric definition of a group law on non-singular cubic curves, we define the concept of group embeddability of (n, k) configuration C as a mapping g of C into an abelian group G such that a set of k points {P1 , P2 , ..., Pk } are collinear in
the configuration C if and only if ∑ g (Pi ) = 0 in the group G. Here we classify the set of all (n, 3) configurations for n ≤ 11 as well as some other notable configurations which can be embedded
into abelian groups.
Here we use the notation introduced by Branko Grünbaum [2]. The following theorems are proved in this thesis:
n (n, 3)
7 Fano Plane
8 (8, 3)
group
Z2 × Z2 × Z2 Z3 × Z3
9 Of the three configurations, two are embeddable in groups.
10 Of the 10 configurations, five are embeddable in groups.
11 Of the 31 configurations, 9 have group embeddings.
But for the first three examples (n = 7, 8 and the Pappus configuration), all other embeddability theorems proved here are new. In doing so we develop several different techniques for finding a group embedding or proving that no such embedding exists. Some ideas in this thesis were inspired by the late Professor N. S. Mendelsohn. For example, group embeddings can be thought of as extensions of configurations to Mendelsohn Triple Systems (see [8], [10]). In fact, configurations naturally give rise to partial quasigroups and adding the “missing triples” including the so-called "tangential relations" are the essential ideas behind the Mendelsohn triple Systems [8].
|
7 |
Group Embeddings of (n,k) ConfigurationsEns, Eric 31 August 2011 (has links)
An (n, k) configuration is a set of n “points” and n “lines” such that each point lies on k lines and each line contains k points. Motivated by the geometric definition of a group law on non-singular cubic curves, we define the concept of group embeddability of (n, k) configuration C as a mapping g of C into an abelian group G such that a set of k points {P1 , P2 , ..., Pk } are collinear in
the configuration C if and only if ∑ g (Pi ) = 0 in the group G. Here we classify the set of all (n, 3) configurations for n ≤ 11 as well as some other notable configurations which can be embedded
into abelian groups.
Here we use the notation introduced by Branko Grünbaum [2]. The following theorems are proved in this thesis:
n (n, 3)
7 Fano Plane
8 (8, 3)
group
Z2 × Z2 × Z2 Z3 × Z3
9 Of the three configurations, two are embeddable in groups.
10 Of the 10 configurations, five are embeddable in groups.
11 Of the 31 configurations, 9 have group embeddings.
But for the first three examples (n = 7, 8 and the Pappus configuration), all other embeddability theorems proved here are new. In doing so we develop several different techniques for finding a group embedding or proving that no such embedding exists. Some ideas in this thesis were inspired by the late Professor N. S. Mendelsohn. For example, group embeddings can be thought of as extensions of configurations to Mendelsohn Triple Systems (see [8], [10]). In fact, configurations naturally give rise to partial quasigroups and adding the “missing triples” including the so-called "tangential relations" are the essential ideas behind the Mendelsohn triple Systems [8].
|
8 |
Evaluating Library ConfigurationsOshikoji, Kimiisa January 2012 (has links)
A wide range of libraries are available for a developer to choose from when building
a software system, but once the library is chosen, the developer must determine which
version of the library to use. Is there some characteristic that can identify the correct
version of a library to use? Even if a library compiles correctly, there could be a better version of that library that will provide superior performance. In particular, the developer would prefer to avoid poor con figurations: that is sets of libraries that perform poorly, or not at all.
This paper describes a methodology by which the sub-performing version of a library
can be identifi ed from the behavior observed from diff erent con figuration of libraries. These are measured by time, static and dynamic analysis of the results of executing the test suite in a project. During the course of these runs, different configurations of the libraries are
substituted in and the results collected to be analyzed. The results of this analysis shows that there is no quick way to identify a sub performing library. However this library can be determined through concentrated eff orts to collect and
analyze time-based data.
|
9 |
Astral configurations /Berman, Leah Wrenn. January 2002 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 2002. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 87-88).
|
10 |
Evaluating Library ConfigurationsOshikoji, Kimiisa January 2012 (has links)
A wide range of libraries are available for a developer to choose from when building
a software system, but once the library is chosen, the developer must determine which
version of the library to use. Is there some characteristic that can identify the correct
version of a library to use? Even if a library compiles correctly, there could be a better version of that library that will provide superior performance. In particular, the developer would prefer to avoid poor con figurations: that is sets of libraries that perform poorly, or not at all.
This paper describes a methodology by which the sub-performing version of a library
can be identifi ed from the behavior observed from diff erent con figuration of libraries. These are measured by time, static and dynamic analysis of the results of executing the test suite in a project. During the course of these runs, different configurations of the libraries are
substituted in and the results collected to be analyzed. The results of this analysis shows that there is no quick way to identify a sub performing library. However this library can be determined through concentrated eff orts to collect and
analyze time-based data.
|
Page generated in 0.0846 seconds