Spelling suggestions: "subject:"consensual nonmonogamous"" "subject:"consensual monogamy""
1 |
An Exploration of Relational Therapists' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practices with Consensually Nonmonogamous ClientsAlexia Marie Kingzette (11797463) 20 December 2021 (has links)
Previous research suggests one in five United States (U.S.) adults will engage in
consensual nonmonogamy (CNM) in their lifetime (Haupert et al., 2017). Despite a significant
number of adults engaging in CNM relationships, there is considerable stigma regarding CNM
status. Clients that identify as CNM are marginalized in the process of psychotherapy (Henrich
& Trawinski, 2016; Kisler & Lock, 2019; Schechinger et al., 2018). One previous study found
that one-third of clients who identify as consensually nonmonogamous reported experiencing
inappropriate therapy practices (Schechinger et al., 2018). Inappropriate therapy practices
included their therapist pathologizing their relationship structure or expressing judgmental
attitudes around their CNM relationship. Clients who experienced inappropriate practices were
significantly more likely to terminate therapy prematurely. The present study measures relational
therapists’ (n = 775) attitudes, monogamism sensitivity, and knowledge regarding consensual
nonmonogamy. Treatment practices when working with clients who identify as CNM were also explored through open-ended questions. A simple linear regression revealed that knowledge
of CNM predicted favorable attitudes toward CNM. Furthermore, monogamism sensitivity
strengthened the relationship between knowledge and attitudes. Specialized training was not
significant in predicting knowledge of CNM or attitudes toward CNM. Thematic analysis
revealed four categories related to working with CNM clients in therapy. These categories were
general treatment, helpful practices, unhelpful practices, and perpetuating stigma. Results of both
the qualitative and quantitative data analyses suggest relational therapy training programs should better
prepare clinicians in working with clients who identify as consensually nonmonogamous.
Specifically, in addressing how monogamism influences therapists ’clinical judgement.
|
2 |
A Phenomenological Approach to Understanding Consensual Nonmonogamy Among African-American CouplesJones Clanton, Krishna 01 January 2019 (has links)
Monogamy is recognized as a singularly accepted relationship construct within the United States. As a result, little is understood about alternative relationship constructs and those who choose them. Even less is understood regarding these practices among members of marginalized communities. Despite this lack of knowledge, there is evidence to suggest that approximately 4-5% of the United States population is engaged in some form of consensually nonmonogamous relationship pairing (a percentage comparable to the LGBTQAI community), and an estimated 25% of the population will engage in some form of consensual nonmonogamy over the course of their lifespan. This study looked to understand the lived experiences of African American men and women in married or cohabitating relationships who have participated in consensually nonmonogamous relationships with secondary partners. This qualitative study was conducted with 3 African American heteronormative married couples, using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) and a combined theoretical framework which includes symbolic interactionism and queer theory. Study findings concluded that consensually nonmonogamous couples viewed consensual nonmonogamy as an orientation as opposed to a lived experience in which their primary relationship remained their priority. Emerging themes included rules related to consensual nonmonogamy, emotional regulation, stigma, and the intersectionality between race and sexuality. Implications for social change include reduced stigma related to nontraditional families, a more informed understanding of practices and experiences involving consensual nonmonogamy and the development of sociopolitical interventions, policy and advocacy, and positive and negative consequences of consensually nonmonogamous experiences.
|
3 |
An Assessment of Therapist Attitudes Toward Polyamorous PeopleRandall, Chelsea V. 28 June 2021 (has links)
No description available.
|
4 |
Polyamory - The Multiple Complexities of Multiple PartnersIsbister, Vianna 01 May 2023 (has links)
This study is an exploration of the relationship between polyamory and how polyamorous people communicate about their relationship dynamics. Drawing from six individual interviews and one focus group, the author compares key language that appears in previous research to the language created by the study participants. Utilizing grounded theory for the analysis, results indicate that the language choices of sexual identity, sexual orientation, and/or relationship model are not sufficient for singularly encompassing a poly experience. Findings indicate that individuals who identify under the umbrella of consensual non-monogamy (CNM) may use the term "polyamory" to describe their own relationship dynamic or to generally signify themselves as CNM. Participants defined "polyamory" as an ambiguous, general term that included relationships of ethical consent and romantic interest. Although participants lacked specialized language to describe their respective relationship dynamics, "polyamory" was used as a way of creating language and understanding around each relationship's dynamic.
|
5 |
Nonmonogamous Clients’ Experiences of Identity Disclosure in TherapyFuzaylova, Viktoriya 14 May 2018 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0405 seconds