Global ETD Search

1	Monetary redress under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom Otis, Ghislain January 1988 (has links) No description available. 340 Constitutional law in Canada
2	Majority-Preferential Two-Round Electoral Formula: A Balanced Value-Driven Model for Canada Esmaeilpour Fadakar, Shahin 06 May 2014 (has links) This research is an enquiry to find an electoral formula that conforms to Canadian constitutional values. Three core values that are pertinent to the issue of electoral systems are identified: democracy, diversity, and efficiency. Each of these core values is divided into different aspects. These aspects will form the backbone of the evaluation of different electoral systems in this work. I will begin with an evaluation of the plurality model of elections, which is currently used in Canada. I will demonstrate that many of the attributes of the current system are not in tune with Canadian constitutional values, in particular with the progressive interpretation that the Supreme Court of Canada has given to the right to vote as enshrined in Section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Although the interpretation of the right to vote will be the main thrust of the constitutional scrutiny in this work, attention will also be given to other pertinent rights such as equality rights, minority rights, and the freedom of expression. Next, I will examine provincial electoral reform initiatives that were initiated in five Canadian provinces. All of these initiatives - three of which were put to referenda and eventually defeated - proposed adopting a variant of proportional representation. Accordingly, I will evaluate proportional systems according to the intended values. I will conclude that these systems have problems of their own and they also cannot strike a fine balance between competing values. In the final stage, I will make a new proposal for elections to the Canadian Parliament. First, I will demonstrate that majority systems are better candidates to attain the envisioned values. Then I will introduce a new variant of the majority model, which I call a majority-preferential two-round variant. I will demonstrate that this new variant will outperform the other variants in the attainment of values if adopted for elections to the House of Commons. Finally, I will argue that the combination of a House of Commons elected through the majority-preferential formula and a proportionally elected Senate will result in a more balanced approach to the relevant constitutional values. Electoral Systems Electoral Reform Electoral Law Elections Constitutional Law Constitutional Law of Canada Comparative Law Comparative Politics Democracy Diversity Efficiency Equality Multiculturalism Fundamental Rights Rights Accountability Geographical Diversity Political Diversity Social Diversity Moderation Stability Strategic Voting Turnout House of Commons Senate The Right to Vote Proportional Representation Preferential Voting Preferential Ballot Political Parties Political Expression Plurality Majority Majoritarianism Judicial Review
3	Majority-Preferential Two-Round Electoral Formula: A Balanced Value-Driven Model for Canada Esmaeilpour Fadakar, Shahin January 2014 (has links) This research is an enquiry to find an electoral formula that conforms to Canadian constitutional values. Three core values that are pertinent to the issue of electoral systems are identified: democracy, diversity, and efficiency. Each of these core values is divided into different aspects. These aspects will form the backbone of the evaluation of different electoral systems in this work. I will begin with an evaluation of the plurality model of elections, which is currently used in Canada. I will demonstrate that many of the attributes of the current system are not in tune with Canadian constitutional values, in particular with the progressive interpretation that the Supreme Court of Canada has given to the right to vote as enshrined in Section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Although the interpretation of the right to vote will be the main thrust of the constitutional scrutiny in this work, attention will also be given to other pertinent rights such as equality rights, minority rights, and the freedom of expression. Next, I will examine provincial electoral reform initiatives that were initiated in five Canadian provinces. All of these initiatives - three of which were put to referenda and eventually defeated - proposed adopting a variant of proportional representation. Accordingly, I will evaluate proportional systems according to the intended values. I will conclude that these systems have problems of their own and they also cannot strike a fine balance between competing values. In the final stage, I will make a new proposal for elections to the Canadian Parliament. First, I will demonstrate that majority systems are better candidates to attain the envisioned values. Then I will introduce a new variant of the majority model, which I call a majority-preferential two-round variant. I will demonstrate that this new variant will outperform the other variants in the attainment of values if adopted for elections to the House of Commons. Finally, I will argue that the combination of a House of Commons elected through the majority-preferential formula and a proportionally elected Senate will result in a more balanced approach to the relevant constitutional values. Electoral Systems Electoral Reform Electoral Law Elections Constitutional Law Constitutional Law of Canada Comparative Law Comparative Politics Democracy Diversity Efficiency Equality Multiculturalism Fundamental Rights Rights Accountability Geographical Diversity Political Diversity Social Diversity Moderation Stability Strategic Voting Turnout House of Commons Senate The Right to Vote Proportional Representation Preferential Voting Preferential Ballot Political Parties Political Expression Plurality Majority Majoritarianism Judicial Review

1

Page generated in 0.0991 seconds