Spelling suggestions: "subject:"born -- needs -- productionsection (biology)"" "subject:"born -- needs -- productionsection (ciology)""
1 |
Technical effeciency in maize production by small-scale farmers in Ga-Mothiba, Limpopo Province, South AfricaBaloyi, Rebecca Tshilambilu January 2011 (has links)
Thesis (M.Agric. (Agricultural Economics)) --University of Limpopo, 2011 / Maize is the most important cereal crop grown in South Africa. This crop is produced throughout the country under diverse environments. The study only focuses on the technical efficiency because it is an important subject in developing agriculture where resources are limited, but high population growth is very common. Technical efficiency is the ability of a farmer to obtain output from a given set of physical inputs. Farmers have a tendency of under and/or over- utilising the factors of production.
The main aim of this study was to analyse the technical efficiency of small-scale maize producers in Ga-Mothiba rural community of Limpopo Province. The objective of the study was to determine the level of technical efficiency of small- scale maize producers and to identify the socio-economic characteristics that influence technical efficiency of small-scale maize producers in Ga-Mothiba. Purposive and Snowball sampling techniques were used to collect primary data from 120 small-scale farmers. Cobb-Douglas production function was used to determine the level of technical efficiency and Logistic regression model was used to analyse the variables that have influence the technical efficiency of maize production.
Cobb-Douglas results reveal that small-scale farmers in Ga-Mothiba are experiencing technical inefficiency in maize production due to the decreasing return to scale, which means they are over-utilising factors of production. Logistic regression results indicate that out of 13 variables included in the analysis as socio-economic factors, 10 of them (level of education, income of the household on monthly basis, farmer`s farming experience, farm size, cost of tractor hours, fertiliser application, purchased hybrid maize seeds, membership to farmers` organisation, is maize profitable) were found to be significant and 3 (gender, age and hired labour) are non-significant. However, farm size was found to be the most significant variable at 99% level, showing a positive relationship to small- scale maize producer`s technical efficiency.Therefore, it is recommended that government should do the on-farm training since farmers mainly depend on trial and error and farmers` should have access to enough arable land and tractor services. However, farmers need to be trained on matters relating to fertiliser application, on the amount of seeds a farmer should apply per ha, and the importance of using hybrid seed.
|
2 |
Technical effeciency in maize production by small-scale farmers in Ga-Mothiba, Limpopo Province, South AfricaBaloyi, Rebecca Tshelambilu January 2011 (has links)
Thesis (M.Sc. Agric.) --University of Limpopo, 2011 / Maize is the most important cereal crop grown in South Africa. This crop is produced throughout the country under diverse environments. The study only focuses on the technical efficiency because it is an important subject in developing agriculture where resources are limited, but high population growth is very common. Technical efficiency is the ability of a farmer to obtain output from a given set of physical inputs. Farmers have a tendency of under and/or over- utilising the factors of production.
The main aim of this study was to analyse the technical efficiency of small-scale maize producers in Ga-Mothiba rural community of Limpopo Province. The objective of the study was to determine the level of technical efficiency of small- scale maize producers and to identify the socio-economic characteristics that influence technical efficiency of small-scale maize producers in Ga-Mothiba. Purposive and Snowball sampling techniques were used to collect primary data from 120 small-scale farmers. Cobb-Douglas production function was used to determine the level of technical efficiency and Logistic regression model was used to analyse the variables that have influence the technical efficiency of maize production.
Cobb-Douglas results reveal that small-scale farmers in Ga-Mothiba are experiencing technical inefficiency in maize production due to the decreasing return to scale, which means they are over-utilising factors of production. Logistic regression results indicate that out of 13 variables included in the analysis as socio-economic factors, 10 of them (level of education, income of the household on monthly basis, farmer`s farming experience, farm size, cost of tractor hours, fertiliser application, purchased hybrid maize seeds, membership to farmers` organisation, is maize profitable) were found to be significant and 3 (gender, age and hired labour) are non-significant. However, farm size was found to be the
most significant variable at 99% level, showing a positive relationship to small- scale maize producer`s technical efficiency.
Therefore, it is recommended that government should do the on-farm training since farmers mainly depend on trial and error and farmers` should have access to enough arable land and tractor services. However, farmers need to be trained on matters relating to fertiliser application, on the amount of seeds a farmer should apply per ha, and the importance of using hybrid seed.
|
3 |
Farmers' perceptions of community-based seed production schemes in Polokwane and Lepelle-Nkumpi Local Municipalities, LimpopoPhala, Mahlatse January 2019 (has links)
Thesis (M. A. Agricultural Management (Agricultural Extension)) -- University of Limpopo, 2019 / Smallholder farmers’ need for regular supply of adequate, quality and affordable seed led
to the establishments of Community-Based Maize Seed Production Schemes (CBSPSs) in
most developing countries, including South Africa. In view of the important influence of
perception on the adoption and continued use of an innovation, this study was undertaken
to evaluate farmers’ perceptions of CBSPSs in Polokwane and Lepelle-Nkumpi Local
Municipalities of Limpopo province. The conceptualization of perception used in this study
was based on the Düvel (1991) framework. The evaluation focused on whether planting
the scheme’s main product, improved Open-Pollinated Varieties (improved OPV maize)
seed meets farmers’ needs based on their perceptions and the extent of farmers’ planting
of improved OPV maize. A census approach was used in view of the small numbers of
seed producers in the schemes; all scheme members (50) were, therefore, interviewed
between 27 March and 21 April 2017. To allow for comparison, an equal number of
farmers (50) who were not members of the scheme were also interviewed. Data was
collected from farmers using a semi-structured questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential
statistics were applied to analyze the data using SPSS software. A binary logistic model
was used to analyze factors that influence farmer perceptions on OPV benefits. The study
findings showed that there is a significant relationship between awareness knowledge of
improved OPV maize and planting of improved OPV maize. Furthermore, the results
showed that farmers perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of improved OPV
maize seed were not different among scheme and non-scheme members as they were all
in agreement that improved OPV maize have more benefits than their own previously
recycled seeds. Finally, findings showed that respondents municipality and scheme
membership had a significant, effect on the positive perception of planting improved OPV
maize seeds. Other explanatory variables such as sex, farming experience, years of
viii
schooling, farm size, income and age of participants had no significant effect on farmer
perceptions. It is therefore recommended that improved OPV maize be made widely
available and promoted based on its advantages to enhance its adoption. Future studies
on these seed schemes could look into the production and financial analysis of CBSPSs to
ascertain their profitability and sustainability. / Agricultural Research Council (ARC)
|
Page generated in 0.1113 seconds