Due to these impacts from the price raising of the materials, the moving out of the industries, the rise of mainland China, and the merger of industries . China Steel Corporation will face more serious challenge from the global competition in the future. Although China Steel Corporation manages well, the past successful experiences could not promise future success. The competitive environment of industry is changing rapidly. To deal with this is to create and develop on the go, to proceed in time, to get with it, to respond quickly and lead the trend then can ensure to keep the development of competition superiority to make China Steel Corporation sustainable development. The target of innovation development for China Steel Corporation : 1.To research and develop high quality and high value for market segmentation. 2.To foster new technology and execute blue sea strategy for creating new market of non competition. 3.To develop on line equipment of automatic inspection system for ensuring quality innovation of products. 4.To research positively the investing chances for the materials of coal and iron mines to maintain the cost and quality of production. The key points of success for promoting innovation program as below: 1.The innovation program is for future innovation and brings with high risk. Therefore, it should offer related staffs more encouragement and assistance. 2.The innovation program needs cross department¡¦s coordination and cooperation for future application. 3.To promote the innovation program to the highest level of the company, it needs to track the execution progress and plan the topic of new program quarterly. It should take notices as below for the future development of China Steel Corporation. 1.To Integrate resources for managing the competition of inner and outer environment. 2.To organize human resources reasonably for hiring new employees in advance for retirement tide would increase the organization vitality. 3.To add production lines of high quality for speeding up procedure raise effects for creating beneficial market. 4.To speed up the investment of steel materials in demanded and grown countries for responding effectively to the growing power of each country and area.

The Industrial Revolution which began at the end of the 18th century opened a new chapter in human history. Since the steam engine was invented by Watt, technology advances and innovations have taken place continuously. This has brought unprecedented prosperity to mankind. However, highly developed technology has led to environmental pollution and an damage the natural ecology and human life. The issue is only now attracting attention. In the face of undeniable environmental damage, every large petrochemistry company has realized that the trend toward greater environmental responsibility cannot be ignored and needs to be seriously considered. Due to global complications, however, there are different priorities and strategies among countries in th way their enterprises approach environmental protection issues. This research paper is focused on the continuity of green management from multi-national oil corporations down to the joint-venture subsidiaries. Two JV subsidiaries and three parent companies are included in this study. This research is based on a non-quantitative study, by means of face-to-face interviews and information collection, in an attempt to understand the policy details and implementation of green management continuity from parent companies to their subsidiaries. This research tackles the following issues: (1) How the multi-national oil corporations extend and control the green management of their subsidiaries (2) Differences among the multinational oil corporations regarding green management (3) Comparing multinational oil corporations, how local oil companies control the green management of their subsidiaries (4) Where Petrochemical industry corporations manage environmental protection and safety within the same department, what is the degree of interaction between these two functions The search has revealed: (1) In terms of influence on environmental protection implementation, the local environmental regulation are obviously more influential than the direction handed down by the parent companies of multi-national corporations. (2) In terms of influence on environmental protection implementation, the influence of local neighborhood consciousness is also greater than that exercised by the parent companies of multi-national corporations. (3) In term of green management control and coordination with subsidiaries, multi-national corporations are made adept than local companies. (4) Multi-national corporations handle environmental protection issues based on risk management (5) Multi-national corporations emphasis safety before environmental protection issues.

Thesis (Professional Degree)--University of Missouri, School of Mines and Metallurgy, 1926. / The entire thesis text is included in file. Typescript. Illustrated by author. Title from title screen of thesis/dissertation PDF file (viewed November 30, 2009) Includes index (p. 30-35).

Thesis (M.A.) - Simon Fraser University, 2005. / Theses (School of Communication) / Simon Fraser University. Also issued in digital format and available on the World Wide Web.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--York University, 2007. Graduate Programme in Communication and Culture. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references. Also available on the Internet. MODE OF ACCESS via web browser by entering the following URL: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:NR46004

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 344-367). Also available on the Internet.

Zugl.: Frankfurt (Oder), Universiẗat, Diss., 2008. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [344]-359) and index.

Zugl.: Berlin, Freie Univ., Diss., 2008/2009 / Includes bibliographical references (p. [305]-329) and index.

No description available.

This thesis examines the promises and challenges of internal dispute resolution (IDR) in the corporate workplace of Canada and the United States. The focus of inquiry is twofold: a theoretical and socio-historical study of the corporation followed by a practical analysis of dispute resolution of human or civil rights. The examination of the role of the corporation begins with a review of the statutory and jurisprudential underpinnings of the "corporate person," which have legitimized the corporation and its powerful place in society. Such power, sanctified by the law, impacts not only society at large but also employees of the corporation. Internalization of legal systems into the corporate workplace has shifted some dispute resolution responsibilities from the public to the private domain, relegating further power to the corporation. This public to private shift has deputized the corporation as an enforcer of its employees' civil rights. Two predominant theories of the corporation - the Contractarian and Communitarian - provide understanding about power relationships among the corporation and its constituents. U.S. and Canadian courts and legislatures have demonstrated a preference for the Contractarian theory, which holds that the corporation is a nexus of contracts, and that firm managers should prioritize its contract with its shareholders, governing the corporation so as to maximize shareholder wealth. A careful examination of corporate theory and governance illustrates the corporation's conflict of interest in holding shareholder interests primary while resolving employment disputes. The power differential between the corporation, as agents of its shareholder principals, and employees presents the greatest challenge in equitably resolving employment disputes. The practical aspects of internal dispute resolution in the corporate workplace focus on the potential benefits and risks to employees. In-house mediation, with certain procedural safeguards, has potential for benefits that outweigh risks to individual employees. Building on principles and structures of formal procedural fairness found in courts of law and administrative tribunals, five essential features can best guarantee fairness in IDR: voluntary participation, retention of employees' right to judicial review, prohibition against reprisal for raising the dispute, use of an external mediator, and oversight of the corporation's IDR program by a neutral, external body.