No description available.

Reprinted August 1968

Thesis (MScAgric)--University of Stellenbosch, 2003. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Poor water management and poor water use efficiency (WUE) have been identified as one of the major problems experienced by vegetable growers in most of the developing countries, including South Africa. This poor management and poor utilization of water have led to a drastic decline in the quality and quantity of available water. In South Africa agriculture uses about 50% of available water. Increasing water demand for domestic, industrial and mining uses, may decrease agriculture's share to less than the current 50%, henceforth, better utilization of this resource is imperative. Selection of a good irrigation system can limit water loss considerably. Some irrigation systems have a potential to save more water than others do. Since irrigation systems affect the WUE of crops, care should be taken when selecting an irrigation system under conditions of limited water quantity. Ebb-and- Flood watering systems have been introduced for effective sub-irrigation and nutrient delivery within closed systems. Such a system was adapted in South Africa, to develop a vegetable production unit for use by families in rural communities, while saving substantial amounts of water. A need to further improve the WUE of this system was subsequently identified. Two studies were conducted at the experimental farm of the University of Stellenbosch (Department of Agronomy). The first trial was conducted under controlled conditions in a glasshouse, and the second under open field conditions. In the first trial, Beta vulgaris (Swiss chard) and Amaranthus spp. ('Imbuya') were grown in two root media; gravel and pumice. In addition, an 'Ebb-and-Flood' and a 'Constant level' system were used with nutrient solutions at two electrical (EC) conductivity levels 1.80 and 3.60 mS cm-I. The results of this (2x2x2x2) factorial experiment indicated that a combination of the 'Ebb-and-Flood' system with gravel as a root medium produced the best results at a low EC, when 'imbuya' was used. A high total WUE was found with 'imbuya', (7.35 g L-I) at EC 1.80 mS cmicompared to a relatively low WUE of 5. 90 g L-I when the 3.60 mS cm-I nutrient solution was used. In the second trial, 'Imbuya's' foliage dry mass, leaf area and WUE was evaluated under field conditions at the Stellenbosch University experimental farm, during the summer of2002. The experimental farm (33°55'S, 18°52'E) is situated in the cooler coastal wine grape-producing region of South Africa with a relatively high annual winter rainfall. This trial was conducted on an alluvial soil, with clay content of 25% and a pH of 5.9 (KC!). A closed 'Ebb-and-Flood' system was compared with two open field irrigation systems ('Drip' and 'Flood') using nutrient solutions at two electrical conductivity levels (1.80 and 3.60 mS cm-i) in all three cases. Foliage dry mass, leaf area as well as WUE was best with 'Drip' irrigation, when a nutrient solution with an electrical conductivity of 3.60 mS cm-i was used. In spite of the fact that additional ground water was available for the soil grown 'Drip' and 'Flood' treatments, the 'Ebb-and-Flood' system outperformed the 'Flood' treatment, especially when the nutrient solution with an EC of 3.6 mS cm-i was used. Insufficient root aeration in the flooded soil could have been a contributing factor. The fact that the 'Ebb-and-Flood' and 'Drip' systems gave the best results when the high EC solution was used to fertigate the plants, may indicate that the plants could have hardened due to the mild EC stress, better preparing them to adapt to the extreme heat that was experienced in the field. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Swak: bestuur van water en 'n swak: water-gebruik-doeltreffendheid (WOD) is as een van die belangrikste probleme geïdentifiseer wat deur groente produsente in die meeste ontwikkelende lande, insluitend Suid-Afrika, ervaar word. Hierdie swak bestuur en benutting van water het daartoe bygedra dat 'n drastiese afname in die kwaliteit asook in die kwantiteit van beskikbare water ervaar word. In Suid-Afrika gebruik die landbou-sektor ongeveer 50% van die beskikbare water. Toenemende water behoeftes vir huisgebruik, industrieë en die mynbou mag hierdie 50% aandeel van die landbou sektor laat krimp. Beter benutting van hierdie skaars hulpbron is dus noodsaaklik. Die keuse van goeie besproeiingsisteme mag waterverliese merkbaar beperk aangesien sekere sisteme se water-besparingspotensiaal beter as ander is. Aangesien besproeiingstelsels die WOD van gewasse beïnvloed, is spesiale sorg nodig waar 'n besproeiingstelsel onder hierdie toestande van beperkte waterbronne gekies moet word. 'Ebb-en-Vloed' sisteme kan aangewend word om water en voedingselemente van onder in 'n wortelmedium te laat opstoot en in 'n geslote sisteem te laat terugdreineer. So 'n sisteem is in Suid-Afrika ontwikkel waarmee groente vir families in landelike gebiede geproduseer kan word terwyl water bespaar word. 'n Behoefte om die WOD van hierdie produksiesisteem verder te verbeter is egter geïdentifiseer. Twee ondersoeke is by die Universiteit van Stellenbosch se proefplaas (Departement Agronomie) gedoen. Die eerste proef is onder beheerde omgewingstoestande in 'n glashuis uitgevoer en die tweede onder veld toestande. In die eerste proef is Beta vulgaris (Snybeet) en Amaranthus spp. ('Imbuya') in twee tipes wortelmedia; gruis en puimsteen verbou. 'n 'Ebb-en-Vloed' asoook 'n 'Konstante vlak' besproeiingsisteem is gebruik terwyl voedingsoplossings ook by twee peile van elektriese geleiding (EC) teen 1.80 en 3.60 mS cm-I toegedien is. Die resultate van hierdie (2x2x2x2) fakroriaal eksperiment het aangetoon dat 'n kombinasie van die 'Ebb-en-Vloed' sisteem met gruis as 'n wortelmedium die beste resultate teen 'n lae EC lewer waar 'imbuya' gebruik is. Die WOD met 'imbuya' was hoog (7.35 g L-1) by 'n EC van 1.80 mS cm-I, vergeleke met 'n relatief lae WOD van 5. 90 g L-1 waar die 3.60 mS cm-I voedingsoplossing gebruik is. In die tweede proef is 'Imbuya' se droë blaarmassa, blaar oppervlakte en WOD onder veldtoestande op die Universiteit van Stellenbsoch se proefplaas in die somer van 2002 ge-evalueer. Die proefplaas (33°55'S, 18°52'E) is in die koeler kusstreke van die wyndruif produksiegebied in die winterreëngebied van Suid-Afrika geleë. Hierdie proef is op alluviale grond met 25% klei en 'n pH van 5.9 (KCi) uitgevoer. 'n Geslote 'Ebb-en-Vloed' sisteem is met twee veld-besproeiingsisteme vergelyk ('Drup' en 'Vloed') terwyl voedingsoplossings teen twee peile van elektriese geleiding (1.80 en 3.60 mS cm-I) in al drie gevalle gebruik is. Blaar droëmassa, blaaroppervlakte asook die WGD was die beste met 'Drup' besproeiing waar die EC van die voedingsoplossing 3.60 mS cm-I was. Ten spyte van die feit dat ekstra grondwater vir die 'Drup' and 'Vloed' behandelings beskikbaar was, het die 'Ebben- Vloed' stelsel beter as die 'Vloed' behandeling gedoen veral waar die voedingsoplossing se EC 3.6 mS cm-I was. Swak wortelbelugting was waarskynlik die rede waarom vloedbesproeiing swak produksie gelewer het. Die feit dat die 'Drup' en die 'Ebb-en-Vloed' behandelings in die veldproef die beste gedoen het waar die EC hoog was, mag moontlik met die gehardheid van die plante verband hou wat aan ekstreem warm en dor toestande blootgestel was.

Differential adaptations of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat (Triticum spp.) genotypes suggest that they be evaluated under multi-environmental conditions. The objectives of this study were to determine if small grain genotypes, bred for various moisture conditions, respond differently in terms of yield, water use, and rooting pattern to contrasting moisture conditions. Eight small grain genotypes were compared under a gradient of water from 89 to 404 mm (plus 254 mm of stored water) in a field study at Marana, AZ. A barley bred for low input conditions had greater root density in the subsoil and used moisture earlier in the season when compared to a high input barley (WestBred Gustoe). The cultivars bred for high input conditions required more water for optimum yield compared to those bred for low input conditions.

A well-managed irrigation scheduling system needs a rapid, preCIse, simple, costeffective and non-destructive soil water content sensor. The PRl profile probe and Diviner 2000 were used to determine the timing and amount of irrigation of three cover crops (Avena sativa L., Secale cereale L. and Lolium multiflonlm Lam.), which were planted at Cedara, KwaZulu-Natal. The PRl profile probe was first calibrated in the field and also compared with the Diviner 2000. For the calibration of the PRl profile probe the factory-supplied parameters (aJ = 8.4 and ao = 1.6) showed good correlation· compared to the soil-estimated parameters (aJ = 11.04 and ao = 1.02). The factorysupplied parameters gave a linear regression coefficient (r2 ) of 0.822 and root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.062. The soil-estimated parameter showed a linear regression coefficient of 0.820 with RMSE of 0.085. The comparison between the soil water content measured using the PR1 profile probe and Diviner 2000 showed a linear regression coefficient of 0.947 to 0.964 with a range of RMSE of 0.070 to 0.109 respectively for the first 100 to 300 mm soil depths. The deeper depths (400, 600 and 1000 mm) showed a linear regression coefficient ofO.716to 0.810 with a range of 0.058 to 0.150 RMSE. These differences between the shallow and deeper depths could be due to soil variability or lack of good contact between the access tube and the surrounding soil. To undertake irrigation scheduling using the PRl profile probe and Diviner 2000, the soil water content limits were determined using field, laboratory and regression equations. The field method was done by measuring simultaneously the soil water content using the PR1 profile probe and soil water potential using a Watermark sensor and tensiometers at three depths (100, 300 and 600 mm) from a 1 m2 bare plot, while the soil dries after being completely saturated. The retentivity function was developed from these measurements and the drained upper limit was estimated to be 0.355 m3 m-3 when the drainage from the pre-wetted surface was negligible. The lower limit was calculated at -1500 kPa and it was estimated to be 0.316 m3m,3. The available soil water content, which is the difference between the upper and lower limit, was equal to 0.039 m3 m,3. In the laboratory the soil water content and matric potential were measured from the undisturbed soil samples taken from the edge of the 1 m2 bare plot before the sensors were installed. Undisturbed soil samples were taken using a core sampler from 100 to 1000 mm soil depth in three replications in 100 mm increments. These undisturbed soil samples were saturated and subjected to different matric potentials between -1 to -1500 kPa. In the laboratory, the pressure was increased after the cores attained equilibrium and weighed before being subjecting to the next matric potential. The retentivity function was then developed from these measurements. The laboratory method moved the drained upper limit to be 0.390 m3 m,3 at -33 kPa and the lower limit be 0.312 m3m-3 at -1500 kPa. The regression equation, which uses the bulk density, clay and silt percentage to calculate the soil water content at a given soil water potential, estimated the drained upper limit to be 0.295 m3m-3at -33 kPa and the lower limit 0.210 m3 m,3 at -1500 kPa. Comparison was made between the three methods using the soil water content measured at the same soil water potential. The fieldmeasured soil water content was not statistically the same with the laboratory and estimated soil water content. This was shown from the paired-t test, where the probability level (P) for the laboratory and estimated methods were 0.011 and 0.0005 respectively at 95 % level of significance. However, it showed a linear regression coefficient of 0.975 with RMSE of 0.064 when the field method was compared with the laboratory method. The field method showed a linear regression coefficient of 0.995 with RMSE of 0.035 when compared with the estimated method. The timing and amount of irrigation was determined using the PR1 profile probe and Diviner 2000. The laboratory measured retentivity function was used to define the fill (0.39 m3 m-3 ) and high refill point (0.34 m3 m-3 ). The soil water content was measured using both sensors two to three times per week starting from May 29 (149 day of year, 2002) 50 days after planting until September 20 (263 day of year) 11 days before harvesting. There were five irrigations and twenty rainfall events. The next date of irrigation was predicted graphically using, the PRl profile probe measurements, to be on 3 September (246 day of year) after the last rainfall event on 29 August (241 day of year) with 8 mm. When the Diviner 2000 was used, it predicted two days after the PRl profile probe predicted date. This difference appeared since the Diviner 2000-measured soil water content at the rooting depth was slightly higher than the PRl profile probe measurements. The amount of irrigation was estimated using two comparable methods (graphic and mathematical method). The amount of irrigation that should have been applied on 20, September (263 day of year) to bring the soil water content to field capacity was estimated to be 4.5 hand 23 mm graphically and 5.23 hand 20 mm mathematically. The difference between these two methods was caused due to the error encountered while plotting the correct line to represent the average variation in soil water content and cumulative irrigation as a function of time. More research is needed to find the cause for the very low soil water content measurements of the PRI profile probe at some depths. The research should be focused on the factors, which could affect the measurement of the PRl profile probe and Diviner 2000 like salinity, temperature, bulk density and electrical conductivity. Further research is also needed to extend the non-linear relationship between the electrical resistance of the sensor and soil water potential up to -200 kPa. This non-linear equation of the Watermark is only applicable within the range of soil water potential between -10 and -100 kPa. / Thesis (M.Sc.)-University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2003.

Dams hold numerous benefits for society through their ability to store water on a long-term basis. However, it is well-known that there is a detrimental effect of dams on the rivers that they impound, and this has been taken into account by the South African National Water Act (1998). The Act specifies a two component Reserve to provide a basic water supply to humans and to provide protection to downstream rivers and their associated ecosystems. From an ecological perspective, emphasis is now placed on ensuring that flow in rivers is maintained in a state that closely mimics the natural flow regime in order to sustain the water resource and its associated aquatic ecosystems. The resulting challenge for water resources modelling is to develop operating rule frameworks that can account for water supply to multiple users, including the "environment" which represents downstream aquatic ecosystems. These frameworks need to consider both water stored in dams, as well as water in the river which has been allocated to different water uscrs. Such an operating rule framework has been implemented ID the daily time-step ACRU agrohydrological model in order to: (a) satisfy the requirements of water users in general, (b) (c) include the environment as a user of water, and thus attempt to satisfy the water requirements of rivers and their associated ecosystems by making artificial releases from dams using both a simple and a complicated approach for determining the environmental requirements. The framework identifies four types of water users, each of which are capable of requesting water from a water source. These users are: a domestic user, representing the basic human needs component of the Reserve, an environmental user, representing the ecological component of the Reserve, an industrial user and an irrigator. The environmental user can generate water requests using either a simple or a complex environmental request method. The simple approach has proved to be oversimplified while the complex approach is capable of producing a flow regime downstream of a dam that closely mimics the natural flow regime. Two operating rules are employed to supply water to the four users, a generic dam operating rule, which considers water requested from a dam, and a channel operating rule, which considers water requested from a river. The two operating rules determine the amounts of water that each user can receive through the use of a curtailment structure, where abstractions made by users are limited, based on the storage level in the dam. Extensive validation of the framework has taken place and a case study was undertaken on the Pongola-Bivane river system which includes the Paris Dam in order to run various real-life scenarios. The results obtained show not only that the operating rule framework is functioning correctly, but that the use of a curtailment structure holds advantages for increasing assurance levels of the water users. There is also evidence to suggest that future possibilities exist for practical application of the operating rule framework to "everyday" dam operations. / Thesis (M.Sc.)-University of Natal,Pietermaritzburg, 2001.

This dissertation thesis researches the impact of ecological conditions on the permanent graminaceous cover not faraway from the peatland in the Borkovice region. These ecological conditions primarily mean water regime of the habitat. The nutritive regime and the fodder crop value are monitored in this thesis. These data were acquired with the help of the vegetation composition, using bio-indikative methods. Resulting values are described in the thesis, and their mutual relations are also stated there. In accordance to the ascertained results, proper pratotechnic measures were proposed. These measures try to harmonize the productive and non-productive functions.

Both red (Trifolium pratense L.) and white (Trifolium repens L.) clover seed yields can be highly variable and low in western Oregon. The objectives of this study were to: i) determine crop water requirements and supplemental irrigation timing, and ii) quantify the effects of soil and water status on inflorescence production, seed yield and seed yield components for red and white clover seed crops. In each species, five supplemental irrigation treatments were applied in 1990 and 1991 to first and second year seed crops grown on a Woodburn silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Aquultic Argixeroll) near Corvallis, OR. Non-irrigated controls were also maintained. In red clover, increased plant water stress reduced the duration of the season-long bud and flower production, stem length, potential floral capacity (PFC), and seed yield (SY). Root rot index (RRI) increased with increasing levels of plant water stress, indicating that supplemental water applications reduced second-year root rot severity. The reduction in SY from increasing plant water stress was primarily caused by a decrease in floral fertility, and less conclusively by reductions in inflorescence number per unit area. One irrigation to fill the soil active profile during peak flowering provided adequate water to maintain efficient seed production. In white clover, SY was maximum in 1990 when water application was delayed until 68% of the available soil-water was used by the crop which maintained an even flush of flowers and restricted vegetative growth. In 1991, all irrigation treatments yielded the same or less than the non-watered control. This was due to the excessive vegetative growth from stolons that had grown between the planted rows the previous and present crop year. In both years excessive amounts of irrigation water favored profuse vegetative growth and reduced SY. Inflorescence density was increased by constraining soil-water in 1990 and was the yield component that most affected SY both years. Crop water stress index (CWSI) was a useful indicator of plant stress status and can be used to schedule irrigations in red and white clovers grown for seed under typical climatic conditions of western Oregon. / Graduation date: 1993

This item was digitized as part of the Million Books Project led by Carnegie Mellon University and supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Cornell University coordinated the participation of land-grant and agricultural libraries in providing historical agricultural information for the digitization project; the University of Arizona Libraries, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and the Office of Arid Lands Studies collaborated in the selection and provision of material for the digitization project.

This item was digitized as part of the Million Books Project led by Carnegie Mellon University and supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Cornell University coordinated the participation of land-grant and agricultural libraries in providing historical agricultural information for the digitization project; the University of Arizona Libraries, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and the Office of Arid Lands Studies collaborated in the selection and provision of material for the digitization project.