京都大学 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(人間健康科学) / 甲第24292号 / 人健博第107号 / 新制||人健||8(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院医学研究科人間健康科学系専攻 / (主査)教授 藤井 康友, 教授 岡 昌吾, 教授 滝田 順子 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Human Health Sciences / Kyoto University / DFAM

INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease that results in the production of ineffective immunoglobulins and monoclonal proteins in the blood and urine, leading to insufficient organ function or death. Currently, there is a 5-year survival rate of 47% for patients diagnosed with MM, with a proportion of patients ultimately succumbing to the disease. The current standard of care for MM includes toxic combinations of chemotherapy. The evolution of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for hematologic cancers such as lymphoma, leukemia, and now myeloma has provided another effective treatment option for patients who have relapsed after standard treatments for MM. Idecabtagene Vicleucel (ide-cel), was approved in March 2021 for patients with relapsed and refractory MM. While CAR T-cell treatment appears to be far less toxic than standard chemotherapy, this therapy comes with its own associated toxicities, mainly cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity (NT). In clinical trials, ide-cel demonstrated to be an effective treatment in some patients, leading to the FDA approval for patients who have exhausted multiple other lines of therapy. Currently, it is unclear why patients respond differently to CAR T-cell treatment and why some patients present with more severe toxicity than others. Therefore, this study aims to examine patient factors such as demographics, age, and treatment history to determine if such characteristics may influence the CAR T-cell response; also, we assess the efficacy of ide-cel in a real-world experience outside of a clinical trial. METHODS: In this study, 14 patients’ medical records were reviewed after receiving commercial CAR T-cell therapy between August 2021 and January 2022. Eligible patients for the therapy were determined by strict inclusion criteria, including having a confirmed diagnosis of MM and exhausting at least four prior lines of therapy, as well as exclusion criteria, such as excluding individuals who have received CAR T-cells prior in a clinical trial setting. Approximately one month before preparation lymphodepletion chemotherapy, eligible patients underwent leukapheresis and had their blood sent to a laboratory to extract T-cells and genetically modify them to express the CAR for reinfusion. On 3 and 5 days prior to CAR T-cell infusion, patients underwent lymphodepletion using fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. Patients remained in the hospital for approximately one week following infusion, pending adverse reactions. After discharge, patients returned to the hospital for routine follow-ups. Data analysis was then performed on collected clinical readouts such as: prior treatments, bone marrow biopsies, response rates, laboratory values from blood samples, and pre- and post-infusion scans of various tissues within the body. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 15 weeks, six patients (43%) achieved a complete response (CR), three patients demonstrated a partial response (PR, 21%), and four patients showed disease progression (PD, 28%). Post-infusion scans were not available for one subject (7%) as they were still in the hospital. These results are similar to the phase I and phase II trials in which 45% and 33% of patients demonstrated a CR post-infusion, respectively. As for associated toxicities, 10 patients (71%) experienced CRS and one patient (7%) presented with ICANS. All patients that achieved a CR experienced ide-cel related toxicities, compared with only 38% of those with less favorable or unknown outcomes, which indicates that systemic immune system activation which causes CRS may be required to achieve a CR but CRS is not always linked with a CR outcome. There were 28 different chemotherapy regimens used as the standard of care treatment prior to ide-cel therapy. We assessed the most recent chemotherapeutic regimen in each patient to assess whether there is an association with most recent treatment and response. Of the six patients that achieved a CR to ide-cel, all were previously treated with RVD or CyBorD regimens, compared to the four patients who had disease progression who were mainly treated with salvage DCEP chemotherapy. Four patients (29%) received DCEP as their final chemotherapy regimen, and 3 of these 4 (75%) demonstrated progressive disease after ide-cel. Two patients received Belantamab-Mafodotin prior to ide-cel treatment, with one patient presenting with disease progression and the other patient achieving CR. 71% of patients experienced CRS following ide-cel infusion, which is resembles the phase II trial of ide-cel in which 84% of patients demonstrated CRS. In this study, only 7% of patients experienced neurological toxicity, which is comparable to the 18% of patients that demonstrated to have ICANS in the phase II study. CONCLUSIONS: We found similar performance of the ide-cel CAR-T therapy in the real world setting as in the clinical trial. Also, the complete responses were achieved by subjects with an array of characteristics, including varying recent chemotherapeutic treatments, IgG, IgA, and light-chain only subtypes of MM, and diverse demographics and other characteristics. The characteristic that demonstrated the most predictability and somewhat unique to subjects with CR was the associated toxicities from ide-cel. Development of these associated toxicities may attest that substantial immune activation, of CAR T-cells and other immune cells, leads to the efficacy of the product in eliminating cancer cells. Further analysis will need to be completed as more individuals enroll in this study to be able to determine if there are significant associations between demographics and prior lines of treatment with response to ide-cel CAR-T therapy. Lastly, future studies should assess the immune cell effector functions that are generated in CR patients that will help to specify the association between ide-cel activation, experienced associated toxicities, and its efficacy.

The aim of cancer immunotherapy is to eradicate tumours by inducing a tumour-specific immune response. This thesis focuses on how antibodies and peptides can improve antigen presentation and the subsequent tumour-specific T cell response. Tumour recognition by the immune system can be promoted through delivery of antigen in the form of a vaccine. One example is the development of a therapeutic peptide vaccine containing both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes. So far, peptide vaccinations have shown limited success in clinical trials and further improvements are needed, such as choice of adjuvant and T cell epitopes, as well as targeted delivery of peptides and adjuvants to the same DC. In paper I, we describe the development of a peptide-peptide conjugate (with a tumour T cell epitope) that, via immune complex formation and FcγR binding, enhance antigen uptake and activation of DCs. The conjugate consists of three tetanus toxin-derived linear B cell epitopes (MTTE) that were identified based on specific IgG antibodies in human serum. Three MTTE peptide sequences were conjugated to a synthetic long peptide (SLP) that consists of a T cell epitope derived from the desired target tumour. In paper II, the conjugate was evaluated in a modified Chandler loop model containing human blood, mimicking blood in circulation. The conjugate was internalised by human monocytes in an antibody-dependent manner. A conjugate containing the model CMV-derived T cell epitope pp65NLV generated recall T cell responses dependent on MTTE-specific antibodies and the covalent conjugation of the three MTTE with the SLP. In paper III, a CD40-specific antibody was characterised for local treatment of solid tumours. The antibody eradicated bladder tumours in mice and induced T cell-mediated immunological memory against the tumour. In paper IV, we characterised the Chandler loop model (used in paper II) for its potential use in predicting cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in response to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Superagonistic antibodies (e.g., OKT3) induced rapid cytokine release whereas no cytokine release was induced by antibodies (e.g., cetuximab) associated with low incidence of CRS in the clinic. In conclusion, this thesis work demonstrates proof-of-concept of improved strategies for antibody- and peptides-based cancer immunotherapies and their potential use in multiple cancer indications.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review article aims to explore the GI changes induced by SARS-CoV-2 and how gut microbial homeostasis can influence these changes and affect the lung-gut axis and its relationship with the induction of the cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19 patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects not only the respiratory system but can produce multi-systemic damage. The expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptors in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, the high prevalence of GI symptoms in severely ill COVID-19 patients, and the abnormalities described in the gut microbiome in these patients have raised concerns about the influence of GI tract as a risk factor or as a potential modulator to reduce the severity of COVID-19. Understanding the mechanisms by which gut dysbiosis may influence viral transmission and disease progression in COVID-19 may help in shaping how accessible therapies, like diet modulation, can potentially help beat the devastating consequences of COVID-19.