Spelling suggestions: "subject:"immunotherapeutics"" "subject:"immunotherapeutic""
1 |
Biological studies on heat-killed mycobacterium vaccaeUstianowski, Andrew Peter January 2002 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Characterization of the IFITM1 signaling pathway in cancerSinclair, Elizabeth Hannah January 2016 (has links)
The aim of this thesis was to establish the therapeutic value of the IFITM1 monoclonal antibodies and to design and develop therapeutically valuable recombinant monoclonal antibodies so as to study the implication of these novel antibodies in cancer therapy. Cancer metastasis is one of the main interests that has given rise to the design and development of innovative strategies for cancer therapeutics. The Interferon Induced Transmembrane Protein 1(IFITM1), a notable member of the IFITM family of proteins has been identified as one of the most up-regulated trans-membrane proteins in metastatic breast cancer and cervical adenocarcinoma. This interferon-regulated protein is also involved in cell migration, invasion in glioma and squamous cancers. This PhD aimed to study IFITM1 as a pro-invasive cancer target by the use of IFITM1 monoclonal antibodies that were raised against the extracellular domain of the human IFITM1 gene. The epitope mapping of IFITM1 revealed the binding activity of the IFITM1 monoclonal antibody. This gave the opportunity to design and generate to new IFITM1-specific molecular tools, in the form of recombinant IFITM1 targeted murine scFv antibody, IFITM1-CPG2 yeast fusion protein antibody for potential application in ADEPT as well as a Mouse-Human Chimeric IFITM1 antibody secreting mammalian cell line. The immunohistochemical staining of IFITM1 in tissue micro array from breast, colon and oeosphegal cancer has revealed that the majority of these cancers produce this protein. However, IFITM1 is over produced in cervical cancer indicating it’s selective over expression in cervical cells. This PhD endeavored to investigate the expression of IFITM1 at a translational and transcriptional level and to study the clinical significance of IFITM1 in cervical cancer. The antibody dependent cell mediated cytotoxic activity of the chimeric IFITM1 antibody was found to be cytotoxic to SiHa cells in vitro. In the future these molecular tools could be used to regulate and further characterize the activity of this transmembrane protein antibody. In an effort to better understand the mechanisms that regulate the activity and the over production of the IFITM1 gene and its interacting proteins, a proteomic screen of cervical cancer cells was carried out using data-independent SWATH-MS on an AB SCIEX TripleTOF™ mass spectrometer. This Mass Spec analysis provided us with a host of IFITM1 biomarkers and revealed that the IFITM1 gene and its binding proteins also cross link with the IRF1 pathway. The data presented in this thesis, demonstrates that the IFITM1 gene can be targeted to either stimulate or inhibit IFITIM1 signaling to engage IFITM1 as a potential pro-invasive extracellular receptor as a target in antibody cancer therapy. In summary, this thesis aimed to confirm the activity and the binding specificity of the IFITM1 antibody. Additionally, this thesis demonstrated a promising application of the recombinant antibody in the ADEPT technology. Characterization of IFITM1 mAb effector functions indicated that the antibody was cytotoxic to cervical cancer cells. This highlights an important element in the immune suppressive tumour microenvironment. And finally, this thesis also provides the basis for the production of recombinant mouse human chimeric antibodies that are a part of a new group of immunotherapeutic molecules paving the way for cancer therapeutics.
|
3 |
Changing landscape of immuno-oncology: CAR-T therapy and PD1/PDL1 blockadeReddy, Naveen Kumar Munagala 18 June 2016 (has links)
The current field of cancer treatment is undergoing a revolution. The influx of novel therapies derived from basic research on the immune system has shifted the landscape of modern medicine. Immunotherapy seeks to use the body’s own immune system as a medium to terminate neoplastic cells. This is performed by manipulating the immune system into either targeting cancer antigens or breaking down barriers towards T cell infiltration. The former mechanism uses CAR-T cells as an instrument to target specific cancer neo-antigens. CAR-T cells begin as T cells derived from a patient’s immune system. These cells are removed from the body and engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) through a process of viral transduction. This CAR allows the T cell to recognize and bind to a specific antigen of interest. In most cases, the antigen is present on cancer cells. The T cells, now expressing the CAR receptor, are transplanted back into the body of the patient and proceed to target cancer cells. This therapy has been used in hematological malignancies to great effect. Applying CAR-T cells to solid tumors is an ongoing process, but has been difficult to establish due to the immunosuppressive aspects of the tumor microenvironment. As such, combining CAR-T cells with traditional anti-cancer therapies has been proven to be efficacious in treating patients with solid tumors. In general, immunosuppression is a large problem in the treatment of cancer. Cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment express receptors that downregulate tumor-targeting actions of the immune system. The discovery of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) allowed researchers to create novel antibodies that inhibit immunosuppression. PD1 located on T cells, binds to PDL1 on cancer and stromal cells. This interaction induces exhaustion and anergy in infiltrating T cells, thereby prevent T cells from targeting cancer cells. As such, the newly approved checkpoint blockade antibodies, Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab, block this interaction and allow T cells to carry out their targeting function. CAR-T cells and checkpoint blockade have both seen immense success in clinical trials and are currently being used the clinic. Nonetheless, development of these therapies for different types of cancers is an ongoing process and one that will require immense effort on behalf of the medical and pharmaceutical establishment
|
4 |
Progress of Entirely Carbohydrate Conjugates in Cancer Immunotherapeutics – Syntheses and DevelopmentsKleski, Kristopher A. January 2020 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
Real world experience of BCMA-directed chimeric antigen T-cell therapy for multiple myelomaCanonico, Dalton 31 January 2023 (has links)
INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease that results in the production of ineffective immunoglobulins and monoclonal proteins in the blood and urine, leading to insufficient organ function or death. Currently, there is a 5-year survival rate of 47% for patients diagnosed with MM, with a proportion of patients ultimately succumbing to the disease. The current standard of care for MM includes toxic combinations of chemotherapy. The evolution of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for hematologic cancers such as lymphoma, leukemia, and now myeloma has provided another effective treatment option for patients who have relapsed after standard treatments for MM. Idecabtagene Vicleucel (ide-cel), was approved in March 2021 for patients with relapsed and refractory MM. While CAR T-cell treatment appears to be far less toxic than standard chemotherapy, this therapy comes with its own associated toxicities, mainly cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity (NT). In clinical trials, ide-cel demonstrated to be an effective treatment in some patients, leading to the FDA approval for patients who have exhausted multiple other lines of therapy. Currently, it is unclear why patients respond differently to CAR T-cell treatment and why some patients present with more severe toxicity than others. Therefore, this study aims to examine patient factors such as demographics, age, and treatment history to determine if such characteristics may influence the CAR T-cell response; also, we assess the efficacy of ide-cel in a real-world experience outside of a clinical trial. METHODS: In this study, 14 patients’ medical records were reviewed after receiving commercial CAR T-cell therapy between August 2021 and January 2022. Eligible patients for the therapy were determined by strict inclusion criteria, including having a confirmed diagnosis of MM and exhausting at least four prior lines of therapy, as well as exclusion criteria, such as excluding individuals who have received CAR T-cells prior in a clinical trial setting. Approximately one month before preparation lymphodepletion chemotherapy, eligible patients underwent leukapheresis and had their blood sent to a laboratory to extract T-cells and genetically modify them to express the CAR for reinfusion. On 3 and 5 days prior to CAR T-cell infusion, patients underwent lymphodepletion using fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. Patients remained in the hospital for approximately one week following infusion, pending adverse reactions. After discharge, patients returned to the hospital for routine follow-ups. Data analysis was then performed on collected clinical readouts such as: prior treatments, bone marrow biopsies, response rates, laboratory values from blood samples, and pre- and post-infusion scans of various tissues within the body. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 15 weeks, six patients (43%) achieved a complete response (CR), three patients demonstrated a partial response (PR, 21%), and four patients showed disease progression (PD, 28%). Post-infusion scans were not available for one subject (7%) as they were still in the hospital. These results are similar to the phase I and phase II trials in which 45% and 33% of patients demonstrated a CR post-infusion, respectively. As for associated toxicities, 10 patients (71%) experienced CRS and one patient (7%) presented with ICANS. All patients that achieved a CR experienced ide-cel related toxicities, compared with only 38% of those with less favorable or unknown outcomes, which indicates that systemic immune system activation which causes CRS may be required to achieve a CR but CRS is not always linked with a CR outcome. There were 28 different chemotherapy regimens used as the standard of care treatment prior to ide-cel therapy. We assessed the most recent chemotherapeutic regimen in each patient to assess whether there is an association with most recent treatment and response. Of the six patients that achieved a CR to ide-cel, all were previously treated with RVD or CyBorD regimens, compared to the four patients who had disease progression who were mainly treated with salvage DCEP chemotherapy. Four patients (29%) received DCEP as their final chemotherapy regimen, and 3 of these 4 (75%) demonstrated progressive disease after ide-cel. Two patients received Belantamab-Mafodotin prior to ide-cel treatment, with one patient presenting with disease progression and the other patient achieving CR. 71% of patients experienced CRS following ide-cel infusion, which is resembles the phase II trial of ide-cel in which 84% of patients demonstrated CRS. In this study, only 7% of patients experienced neurological toxicity, which is comparable to the 18% of patients that demonstrated to have ICANS in the phase II study. CONCLUSIONS: We found similar performance of the ide-cel CAR-T therapy in the real world setting as in the clinical trial. Also, the complete responses were achieved by subjects with an array of characteristics, including varying recent chemotherapeutic treatments, IgG, IgA, and light-chain only subtypes of MM, and diverse demographics and other characteristics. The characteristic that demonstrated the most predictability and somewhat unique to subjects with CR was the associated toxicities from ide-cel. Development of these associated toxicities may attest that substantial immune activation, of CAR T-cells and other immune cells, leads to the efficacy of the product in eliminating cancer cells. Further analysis will need to be completed as more individuals enroll in this study to be able to determine if there are significant associations between demographics and prior lines of treatment with response to ide-cel CAR-T therapy. Lastly, future studies should assess the immune cell effector functions that are generated in CR patients that will help to specify the association between ide-cel activation, experienced associated toxicities, and its efficacy.
|
Page generated in 0.0399 seconds