This thesis compares the impact on disk performance in a GNU/Linux  environmentwith three encryption algorithms: AES,  Serpent and Twofish in three different implementations: DM-crypt, Loop-AES and Truecrypt. For all three algorithms a key length of 256 bits is used. The thesis shows that the least performance impact during data encryption, and thus file writing, is reached by using AES or Twofish encryption implemented in DM-crypt or TrueCrypt. The thesis shows that some data operations with a sufficiently low processor utilization barely affects disk performance at all if encrypted using the optimal implementation and algorithm. It is also discovered that the performance impact during data decryption, or file reading, can be minimized by using the most efficient implementation and algorithm. The best results are met with the AES or Twofish cipher, regardless of implementation. An important conclusion that  is  drawn is that it is hard to determine a superior encryption solution for all purposes. However, by reviewing and examining the collected data from all aspects of disk performance the AES implementation in TrueCrypt is, with small marginals, determined to be the most optimal. / Undersökningen jämför hur krypteringsalgoritmerna AES, Serpent och Twofish implementerade i DM-crypt, Loop-AES och TrueCrypt påverkar diskprestandan i en GNU/Linux-miljö. Samtliga krypteringsalgoritmer tillämpas med en nyckellängd på 256 bitar. Undersökningen visar att högst skrivhastighet och således krypteringshastighet uppnås med algoritmerna AES och Twofish i DM-crypt eller Truecrypt. Krypteringens påverkan på diskprestanda är beroende av vilka typer av operationer som utförs och hur hög processorsysselsättningsgraden är. Vid  simplare  I/O-operationer har  den mest optimala  krypteringslösningen knappt någon påverkan på diskprestandan överhuvudtaget. Undersökningen visar också att påverkan av prestanda vid dekryptering är minst vid tillämpning av AES eller Twofish oavsett implementering. En viktig slutsats som dras är att det inte finns en överlägsen krypteringslösning för samtliga användningsområden. Genom att sammanställa och granska insamlad data gällande samtliga aspekter beträffande diskprestanda fastställs TrueCrypts implementation av AES till att vara den mest optimala, trots små marginaler.

This thesis is about encrypted filesystems and is aimed mainly for Linux solutions. At first there is explained why is it necessary to encrypt your data at all. Next is written about pros and cons of encrypting methods such as whole disk encryption, partition encryption, container encryption and file encryption. After the introduction there are mentioned most common security issues which can help attacker to decrypt your data or modify them. Furthermore this thesis contains short description about the most often used encrypted filesystems. There is also small how-to for the most important encrypted filesystems available in Linux and comparison of their speed. Next part of this thesis contains dm-crypt and LUKS description. In the last chapter all information are concluded. There is also mentioned benefit of this work and possibilities, what can be done in future.