This thesis compares the impact on disk performance in a GNU/Linux  environmentwith three encryption algorithms: AES,  Serpent and Twofish in three different implementations: DM-crypt, Loop-AES and Truecrypt. For all three algorithms a key length of 256 bits is used. The thesis shows that the least performance impact during data encryption, and thus file writing, is reached by using AES or Twofish encryption implemented in DM-crypt or TrueCrypt. The thesis shows that some data operations with a sufficiently low processor utilization barely affects disk performance at all if encrypted using the optimal implementation and algorithm. It is also discovered that the performance impact during data decryption, or file reading, can be minimized by using the most efficient implementation and algorithm. The best results are met with the AES or Twofish cipher, regardless of implementation. An important conclusion that  is  drawn is that it is hard to determine a superior encryption solution for all purposes. However, by reviewing and examining the collected data from all aspects of disk performance the AES implementation in TrueCrypt is, with small marginals, determined to be the most optimal. / Undersökningen jämför hur krypteringsalgoritmerna AES, Serpent och Twofish implementerade i DM-crypt, Loop-AES och TrueCrypt påverkar diskprestandan i en GNU/Linux-miljö. Samtliga krypteringsalgoritmer tillämpas med en nyckellängd på 256 bitar. Undersökningen visar att högst skrivhastighet och således krypteringshastighet uppnås med algoritmerna AES och Twofish i DM-crypt eller Truecrypt. Krypteringens påverkan på diskprestanda är beroende av vilka typer av operationer som utförs och hur hög processorsysselsättningsgraden är. Vid  simplare  I/O-operationer har  den mest optimala  krypteringslösningen knappt någon påverkan på diskprestandan överhuvudtaget. Undersökningen visar också att påverkan av prestanda vid dekryptering är minst vid tillämpning av AES eller Twofish oavsett implementering. En viktig slutsats som dras är att det inte finns en överlägsen krypteringslösning för samtliga användningsområden. Genom att sammanställa och granska insamlad data gällande samtliga aspekter beträffande diskprestanda fastställs TrueCrypts implementation av AES till att vara den mest optimala, trots små marginaler.

This thesis looked at three encryption applications that all use the symmetric encryption algorithms AES, Twofish and Serpent but differ in their implementation and how this difference would illustrate itself in performance benchmarks depending on the type of storage device that they were used on. Three mechanical hard drives and one solid state drive were used in the performance benchmarks which measured a variety of different disk operations across the three encryption applications and their algorithms. From the benchmarks performance charts were produced which showed that DiskCryptor had the best performance when using a solid state drive and that TrueCrypt had the best performance when using mechanical hard drives. By choosing DiskCryptor as the encryption application when using a solid state drive a performance increase of 38.9% compared to BestCrypt and 28.4% compared to TrueCrypt was achieve when using the AES algorithm. It was also shown that Twofish was overall the best performing algorithm. The primary conclusion that can be drawn from this thesis is that it is important to choose the right encryption application depending on the type of storage device used in order to get the best performance possible.

In this thesis, one finalist cipher of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) block cipher contest, Twofish proposed by Schneier et al, is studied in order to observe the validity of the statement made by Arikan about the randomness of the cipher, which contradicts National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)&rsquo / s results. The strength of the cipher to cryptanalytic attacks is investigated by measuring its randomness according to the avalanche criterion. The avalanche criterion results are compared with those of the Statistical Test Suite of the NIST and discrepancies in the second and third rounds are explained theoretically.

In this thesis, two finalists of the AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) contest, RC6 developed by Rivest et al, Twofish proposed by Schneier et al, and preceding algorithm of RC6 cipher, RC5, are studied. The strength of ciphers to cryptanalytic attacks is measured according to different criteria. The studied evaluation criteria are the avalanche criterion and its derivations. After theimplementation of the algorithms and the test procedures, they are compared with each other. Different test criteria, including avalanche criterion, avalanche weight distribution (AWD) for randomness of RC5, RC6 and Twofish algorithms are applied / and the S-boxes of the Twofish algorithm are analyzed according to nonlinearity criterion. The avalanche criteria results of RC6 and Twofish are compared with NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) Statistical Test Suite results.