- About
-
The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers
to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is
provided by the
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
Search results
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 (0.031 seconds)Spelling suggestions: "subject:"diskcryptor"" "subject:"kryptor""
| 1 |
Prestandapåverkan med diskkrypteringFogelström, Linus Fogelström, Broman, Ludwig January 2015 (has links)
Att skydda sin information mot offline-attacker och stöld kan vara önskvärt, därför kan man använda sig utav filsystemskryptering. Den här studien är en prestandatestning av de tre olika kryptoprogrammen BestCrypt, BitLocker och DiskCryptor, som krypterar filsystemet. Resultaten syftar till att ge en fingervisning av vilket kryptoprogram man bör välja. Detta tydliggjordes när testerna visade att filsystemskryptering påverkar responsen hos Apache och FileZilla och att de påverkades olika mycket beroende av kryptoprogram. / To protect data against offline-attacks and theft, which might be desirable, one can encrypt the filesystem. This study is a performance test of the three different encryption programs BestCrypt, BitLocker and DiskCryptor. Results of the study aims to give a pointer to which encryption program one should choose. This was clear when the tests showed that the encryption affected the response of the services Apache and Filezilla and that they were affected differently depending on which encryption program that was used.
|
| 2 |
Performance differences in encryption software versus storage devicesOlsson, Robin January 2012 (has links)
This thesis looked at three encryption applications that all use the symmetric encryption algorithms AES, Twofish and Serpent but differ in their implementation and how this difference would illustrate itself in performance benchmarks depending on the type of storage device that they were used on. Three mechanical hard drives and one solid state drive were used in the performance benchmarks which measured a variety of different disk operations across the three encryption applications and their algorithms. From the benchmarks performance charts were produced which showed that DiskCryptor had the best performance when using a solid state drive and that TrueCrypt had the best performance when using mechanical hard drives. By choosing DiskCryptor as the encryption application when using a solid state drive a performance increase of 38.9% compared to BestCrypt and 28.4% compared to TrueCrypt was achieve when using the AES algorithm. It was also shown that Twofish was overall the best performing algorithm. The primary conclusion that can be drawn from this thesis is that it is important to choose the right encryption application depending on the type of storage device used in order to get the best performance possible.
|
Page generated in 0.0344 seconds