Orientador: André Luis Balbi / Resumo: A Diálise Peritoneal Contínua (DPC) e a Hemodiálise (HD) diária são opções para o tratamento de pacientes com Lesão Renal Aguda (LRA). A DPC pode causar alterações na função respiratória principalmente relacionadas ao aumento da Pressão Intra-Abdominal (PIA) e a HD pode levar a hipoxemia pelo contato do sangue com o circuito extracorpóreo e pela disfusão do CO2 no dialisato. No entanto, ambos os métodos podem melhorar a mecânica respiratória e a oxigenação pela retirada de líquidos e consequentemente redução do edema pulmonar. O objetivo principal deste estudo foi comparar os efeitos da DPC e da HD diária na mecânica ventilatória e oxigenação de pacientes com LRA sob Ventilação Mecânica Invasiva (VMI). Metodologia: Estudo tipo coorte prospectivo que avaliou 154 pacientes, sendo 37 em DPC e 94 em HD. Foram avaliados, por até 3 dias, os parâmetros de mecânica respiratória como Complacência Estática (Cest) e Resistência do Sistema Respiratório (Rsr) e também o Índice de Oxigenação (IO). Os pacientes foram avaliados nos momentos 1, 2 e 3 (pré-diálise) e 1, 2 e 3 (pós-diálise) em relação a Cest e Rsr e nos momentos 1, 2 e 3 em relação ao IO. Para comparação entre as características clínicas iniciais dos pacientes foram utilizados os testes t de student, qui-quadrado e exato de fisher. Para comparação das variáveis Cest, Rsr e IO no tempo foi utilizado o modelo Anova de medidas repetidas, seguido do teste de comparações múltiplas de Wald ou Tukey. Foi considerado um nível de signif... (Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo) / Abstract: The Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis (CPD) and daily Hemodialysis (HD) are options for the treatment of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) patients. The CPD can cause changes in respiratory function mainly related to increase Intra-Abdominal Pressure (IAP) and HD can lead to hypoxemia due to blood contact with the extracorporeal circuit and the diffusion of CO2 in the dialysate. However, both methods can improve respiratory mechanics and oxygenation due to the fluid removal and consequently reduced pulmonary edema. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the CPD and daily HD on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation of AKI patients undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV). Methodology: A prospective cohort study evaluated 154 patients, 37 on CPD and 94 on HD. The respiratory mechanics parameters such as Static Compliance (Cest) and Resistance of the Respiratory System (Rsr) and Oxygenation Index (OI) were assessed for three days. Patients were evaluated at moments 1, 2 and 3 (pre-dialysis) and 1, 2 and 3 (post-dialysis) in relation to Cest and Rsr and at times 1, 2 and 3 in relation to the IO. The student t test, chi-square and fisher exact were used to compare the baseline patients characteristics. ANOVA model for repeated measures was used to compare the variables Cest, Rsr and OI, followed by the multiple comparison Tukey or Wald Test. Significance level was 5%. Results: Comparing the initial clinical parameters between the two groups, all characteristics were simi... (Complete abstract click electronic access below) / Doutor

Submitted by CIBELE TAÍS PUATO DE ALMEIDA null (ctpdalmeida@alunos.fmb.unesp.br) on 2016-04-01T18:34:01Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese Cibele Tais Puato de Almeida.pdf: 839793 bytes, checksum: 01a41de5a6976ff81d2d379acd327e1f (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Ana Paula Grisoto (grisotoana@reitoria.unesp.br) on 2016-04-05T18:47:49Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 almeida_ctp_dr_bot.pdf: 839793 bytes, checksum: 01a41de5a6976ff81d2d379acd327e1f (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-05T18:47:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 almeida_ctp_dr_bot.pdf: 839793 bytes, checksum: 01a41de5a6976ff81d2d379acd327e1f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-02-26 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / A Diálise Peritoneal Contínua (DPC) e a Hemodiálise (HD) diária são opções para o tratamento de pacientes com Lesão Renal Aguda (LRA). A DPC pode causar alterações na função respiratória principalmente relacionadas ao aumento da Pressão Intra-Abdominal (PIA) e a HD pode levar a hipoxemia pelo contato do sangue com o circuito extracorpóreo e pela disfusão do CO2 no dialisato. No entanto, ambos os métodos podem melhorar a mecânica respiratória e a oxigenação pela retirada de líquidos e consequentemente redução do edema pulmonar. O objetivo principal deste estudo foi comparar os efeitos da DPC e da HD diária na mecânica ventilatória e oxigenação de pacientes com LRA sob Ventilação Mecânica Invasiva (VMI). Metodologia: Estudo tipo coorte prospectivo que avaliou 154 pacientes, sendo 37 em DPC e 94 em HD. Foram avaliados, por até 3 dias, os parâmetros de mecânica respiratória como Complacência Estática (Cest) e Resistência do Sistema Respiratório (Rsr) e também o Índice de Oxigenação (IO). Os pacientes foram avaliados nos momentos 1, 2 e 3 (pré-diálise) e 1, 2 e 3 (pós-diálise) em relação a Cest e Rsr e nos momentos 1, 2 e 3 em relação ao IO. Para comparação entre as características clínicas iniciais dos pacientes foram utilizados os testes t de student, qui-quadrado e exato de fisher. Para comparação das variáveis Cest, Rsr e IO no tempo foi utilizado o modelo Anova de medidas repetidas, seguido do teste de comparações múltiplas de Wald ou Tukey. Foi considerado um nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: Na comparação dos parâmetros clínicos iníciais entre os dois grupos, todas as características foram iguais, exceto a idade que foi maior entre aqueles em DPC (70,8±11,6 Vs 60±15,8 - p<0,0001). Nos dois grupos a Cest aumentou significativamente, sem difereça entre os grupos – Pré-Diálise (DPC: 40±17,4, 42,8±17,2,48±19; HD: 39,1±21,3, 39,5±18,9, 45,2±21) Pós-Diálise (DPC: 42,8±17,2, 48±19, 57,1±18,3; HD: 42±19, 45±18,5, 56±24,8). A Rsr permaneceu estável entre os pacientes em DPC (Pré-Diálise: 10,4±5,1, 13,3±7,7, 13,5±10,3; Pós-Diálise: 13,3±7,7, 13,5±10,3, 11,1±5,9) e diminuiu entre os pacientes em HD (Pré-Diálise: 10,4±5,1, 10,4±5,1, 10,4±5,1; Pós-Diálise: 10,5±6,8, 10±4,9, 8,9±4,2). Houve diferença estatística na Rsr entre os grupos, no pós-diálise 1 e 2 (p=0,03). O IO aumentou nos dois grupos (DPC: 260,7±119, 252,7±87,1, 287,3±88,4; HD: 228±85, 257±84, 312,1±111,5), sem diferença estatística entre eles. Conclusão: Os resultados obtidos no presente trabalho sugerem que pacientes com LRA, sob VMI, submetidos tanto a DPC quanto a HD Diária apresentam melhora da mecânica ventilatória e da oxigenação, sem diferença entre os grupos. / The Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis (CPD) and daily Hemodialysis (HD) are options for the treatment of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) patients. The CPD can cause changes in respiratory function mainly related to increase Intra-Abdominal Pressure (IAP) and HD can lead to hypoxemia due to blood contact with the extracorporeal circuit and the diffusion of CO2 in the dialysate. However, both methods can improve respiratory mechanics and oxygenation due to the fluid removal and consequently reduced pulmonary edema. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the CPD and daily HD on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation of AKI patients undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV). Methodology: A prospective cohort study evaluated 154 patients, 37 on CPD and 94 on HD. The respiratory mechanics parameters such as Static Compliance (Cest) and Resistance of the Respiratory System (Rsr) and Oxygenation Index (OI) were assessed for three days. Patients were evaluated at moments 1, 2 and 3 (pre-dialysis) and 1, 2 and 3 (post-dialysis) in relation to Cest and Rsr and at times 1, 2 and 3 in relation to the IO. The student t test, chi-square and fisher exact were used to compare the baseline patients characteristics. ANOVA model for repeated measures was used to compare the variables Cest, Rsr and OI, followed by the multiple comparison Tukey or Wald Test. Significance level was 5%. Results: Comparing the initial clinical parameters between the two groups, all characteristics were similar except that the age that was higher among those on CPD (70.8 ± 11.6 vs 60 ± 15.8 - p <0.0001). In both groups, Cest increased significantly, with no difference between the two groups – Pre-Dialysis (CPD: 40 ± 17.4, 42.8 ± 17.2, 48 ± 19; HD: 39.1 ± 21.3, 39. 5 ± 18.9, 45.2 ± 21) Post-Dialysis (CPD: 42.8 ± 17.2, 48 ± 19, 57.1 ± 18.3; HD: 42 ± 19, 45 ± 18.5, 56 ± 24.8). The Rsr remained stable among patients on CPD (Pre-Dialysis: 10.4 ± 5.1, 13.3 ± 7.7, 13.5 ± 10.3, Post-Dialysis: 13.3 ± 7.7, 13.5 ± 10.3, 11.1 ± 5.9) and decreased among HD patients (Pre-Dialysis: 10.4 ± 5.1, 10.4 ± 5.1, 10.4 ± 5, 1, Post-Dialysis: 10.5 ± 6.8, 10 ± 4.9, 8.9 ± 4.2) There was significant statistically difference in Rsr between the two groups at the post-dialysis moments 1 and 2 (p = 0.03). OI increased in both groups (CPD: 260.7 ± 119, 252.7 ± 87.1, 287.3 ± 88.4; HD: 228 ± 85, 257 ± 84, 312.1 ± 111.5), although there was not significant statistically difference between them. Conclusion: This study showed that AKI patients undergoing IMV and daily HD or CPD had improvement in the mechanical ventilation and oxygenation, with no difference between the two groups.

L’augmentation de la fréquence hebdomadaire des séances d’Hémodialyse (HD) serait la technique qui se rapprocherait le plus du rôle physiologique des reins. L’Hémodialyse quotidienne (HDQ) a été développée afin d’améliorer la qualité de vie des patients ainsi que l’épuration sanguine. Néanmoins, son association avec la survie reste controversée et son lien avec l’accès à la greffe rénale n’avait jusqu’alors jamais été étudié. Par ailleurs, les connaissances en termes de pratiques en France étaient jusqu’à aujourd’hui très faibles. Dans ce contexte, cette thèse vise à caractériser les patients français en HDQ et leurs trajectoires en plus d’analyser l’association entre l’HDQ et la transplantation rénale et la survie des patients. Une étude épidémiologique a été menée à partir du Réseau en Epidémiologie et Information en Néphrologie (REIN) où ont été inclus tous les patients âgés ≥18 ans et qui ont démarré une séance d’HDQ entre 2003 et 2012 en France. L’extraction d’un certain nombre de données biocliniques de REIN a permis de montrer que les patients français en HDQ étaient caractérisés pour présenter des profils très hétérogènes. En effet, en fonction de l’âge médian (64 ans) deux sous-groupes de patients ont pu être comparés : les âgés (moyenne d’âge : 76,6 ± 6,9 ans) en mauvaises conditions médicales et qui décédaient rapidement ; les jeunes (moyenne d’âge : 47,2 ± 12 ans) qui étaient en HDQ avant d’accéder à la greffe. Par ailleurs, en fonction des trajectoires initiales, deux sous-groupes ont également pu être comparés : patients démarrant directement par HDQ (dHDQ, n=257) ; patients démarrant par un autre traitement (cHDQ, n=496). Ensuite, cette thèse a permis de montrer qu’en France, après l’inscription sur la liste, les patients en HDQ avaient une moindre probabilité d’accéder à la greffe que les patients en HD 3x/semaine (SHR=0,74 ; IC 95%: 0,58-0,95). Par ailleurs, après ajustement sur l’âge, le sexe et les comorbidités, l’HDQ était associée avec un sur-risque de décès (HR=1,58 ; IC 95%: 1,4-1,8) en comparaison avec l’HD 3x/semaine. Ce travail de thèse a permis d’élucider nos connaissances en termes de pratiques associées avec l’HDQ bien que les raisons pour lesquelles les patients démarrent une HDQ ne sont pas connues. Nous émettons l’hypothèse que les indications pour l’HDQ en France sont probablement différentes de celles appliquées dans d’autres pays, ceci pourrait expliquer nos résultats en termes de mortalité. / An increase frequency of weekly sessions of Hemodialysis (HD) should be more physiological than a conventional HD 3x/week. Daily Hemodialysis (DHD) was developed in order to enhance patients’ quality of life in addition to blood purification. Nevertheless, its effect on survival remains controversial and the association between DHD and the access to renal transplantation has never been evaluated. Moreover, knowledges about DHD practices in France were until today very poor. In this context, the aims of this thesis was firstly, to describe profiles of French patients on DHD and their initial trajectories; secondly to analyze the association between DHD and renal transplantation, then survival in comparison with conventional HD 3x/week. An epidemiologic study has been conducted based on Renal Epidemiology and Information in Nephrology (REIN) registry. Were included all patients aged ≥18 years who initiated a DHD between 2003 and 2012 in France. Bio-clinical data analyses showed that French patients were characterized to present various profiles. Indeed, according to the median age (64 years), two sub-groups were distinguished and compared: old (mean age: 76.6 ± 6.9 years) in bad medical conditions who died rapidly; young (mean age: 47.2 ± 12 years) waiting for renal transplantation. Moreover, according to the initial trajectories, two sub-groups were also constructed: patients starting directly with DHD (dDHD, n=257); patients starting with another dialysis before switching for DHD (cDHD, n=496). Then, this thesis allowed showing that in France and after being waitlisting, patients on DHD had lower probability of being renal transplanted (SHR=0.74; 95%CI: 0.58-0.95). Then, after the adjustment on sex, age and comorbidities, DHD was associated with a higher risk of death compared to conventional HD 3sessions/week. Reasons why a patient started a DHD are unknown, but this work allows us to enhance our knowledges in terms of medical practices associated with DHD. We hypothesized that DHD indications in France might be different from other countries which could explain our results in terms of mortality.