We examine the financing choices of undiversified large shareholders or owner-managers in a continuous time structural model with rational expectations. The interplay between the objective of the undiversified, self-interested owner-manager who controls the firm and the valuation of the firms marketed claims by well-diversified outside investors, has a major impact on leverage and debt maturity choices as well as credit spreads. The effect of this interplay is particularly significant in a world where the representative investor (who determines asset prices in the economy) is risk-averse leading to nonzero market prices of systematic risk and risk premia of the firms investment opportunities. In a perfect information framework with no taxes or bankruptcy costs, we show that, the owner-manager could, depending on the projects characteristics, finance them exclusively with debt, exclusively with equity, or with a combination of equity and debt. Ceteris paribus, leverage increases with the expected growth rate of firm value under its investment opportunities, and decreases with its volatility. Debt maturity varies non-monotonically in a U-shaped manner with the expected growth rate, and decreases with the volatility. Our results reconcile empirical evidence on the variation of financing choices with firm characteristics that is not completely consistent with previous theories. The significant impact of the expected returns (therefore, risk premia) of firms investment opportunities on their leverage ratios, debt maturities, and credit spreads are important implications of our theory that cannot be obtained in these models or in models in which all agents are risk-neutral so that risk premia are zero. We empirically test the implications of our theory for the relationships among firms financing and debt maturity choices and the expected growth rate and volatility of their asset values. Controlling for all the significant determinants of firms financing and debt maturity choices identified by earlier studies, we show significant empirical support for our predictions.

This dissertation attempts in three essays to contribute to the growing body of research on the problems associated with sudden stops of capital inflows, known to have been at the heart of many recent emerging market crises. It does this by developing basic models that can incorporate sudden stops and hopefully make policy relevant recommendations. The first essay develops a simple three date representative agent model of a small open endowment economy without money. It allows sudden stops to occur at date two and asks whether individuals in such a shock-prone world are still better off borrowing than in autarky. Unambiguously, this chapter shows that individuals are better off borrowing than in autarky and provides a tractable core model on which the later chapters build. The second essay then includes a long-term borrowing option as well as country-specific risk premia based on an information asymmetry between domestic borrowers and international lenders. This allows analysis of optimal maturity choices in a meaningful way. The intent is to address questions in the literature concerning whether emerging economies could enhance welfare by imposing short-term capital controls to encourage the use of longer-maturing debt and thus avoid the sudden stop. The results imply that short-term capital controls would generally lower welfare, even when sudden stops are fully anticipated. Finally, the third essay extends the horizon of the model and includes a much wider range of maturities. This allows one to start making sense of maturity bunching (when a country's debt all matures around a given date) which is known to exacerbate sudden-stop related problems. The model shows that maturity bunching can occur endogenously when both risk premia and uncertainty over the duration of the sudden stop are present.

This thesis examines debt maturity and trade credit in public and private firms. It consists of three essays that try to answer the following questions: Does the IPO decision affect the debt maturity structure of a firm? Do private firms use more or less trade credit than public firms? Does the supplier's listing status affect its trade credit provision? The first essay investigates the effect of an initial public offering (IPO) on the evolution of debt maturity structure using a sample of U.S. firms that went public during the period 1998-2011. I find that firms decrease their short-term debt by 19% in the first two years after the IPO and decrease it post-IPO, by about 7% relative to the pre-IPO level. These results continue to hold in a sample of new debt issues, in a difference-in-difference regression of IPO and non-IPO firms, in a treatment regression to account for endogeneity of the IPO decision, and in an instrumental variable regression to control for the joint determination of leverage and debt maturity. Further results show that the decline in short-term debt post-IPO is consistent with the asymmetric information and agency costs of equity theories and inconsistent with the agency costs of debt theory. I also find that the IPO effect on debt maturity was magnified during the recent financial crisis. The second essay explores the use of trade credit by public and private firms using a sample of U.S. firms during the period 1995-2012. Evidence shows that private firms use more trade credit by about 40.4% than public firms. This result is robust to models accounting for sample selection and for the endogeneity associated with a firm's decision to go public. In line with the asymmetric information and credit constraints theories, private firms that are young, have more growth opportunities, and fewer tangible assets rely more on trade credit than their public counterparts. Compared to private firms, public firms are faster in adjusting toward their target trade credit due to their lower adjustment costs. I also find that during the recent financial crisis, public firms increased their reliance on trade credit, while, suppliers granted private firms less trade credit. The third essay examines the supply side of trade credit; more specifically, the impact of a supplier's listing status on its trade credit provision using a sample of U.S. firms during the period 1994-2012. The findings show that public firms provide nearly a quarter more trade credit than their private counterparts. I propose that this is because public firms have higher financial capability, better ability in handling the trade credit process, and in enforcing payments and contract terms, than private firms. I rule out that the endogeneity of the listing decision and the observable differences between public and private firms have driven my earlier results. Additional tests show that firm characteristics, industries types, and level of competition, have a significant impact on the level of trade credit provided by public and private firms. The results also indicate that both types of firms provided less trade credit during the recent financial crisis.

Background: Sweden has a tradition of a concentrated ownership structure where many owners use dual asset classes to maintain corporate control by possessing small portions of the dividend rights. Financial literature has shown that these controlling owners find more incentives to divert corporate resources for private use, at the expense of shareholders. Recent studies also show that involvement in extraction of private benefits leads to long maturity debt as controlling owners avoid frequent monitoring by lenders. As this causes a conflict over corporate debt maturity between controlling and minority shareholders, we investigate if the presence of multiple large shareholders (MLS) mitigates this conflict through control contests. Purpose: The purpose of this thesis is to examine and analyze how different ownership structures affect the informative environment within a firm. In addition, the thesis investigates how ownership structure affect debt maturity structure and what this mean for large and minority shareholders. Method: The study uses a quantitative approach with panel data of 74 publicly traded non – financial Swedish firms over the period of 2006 – 2014. A deductive approach has been applied in order to explain empirical results from theory and previous literature. Results: We find evidence that controlling owners with a separation in control and cash flow rights tend to insulate themselves through long term debt, creating a bad informative environment with information asymmetry and agency costs. Furthermore, our results show robust evidence that MLS mitigates these problems since control contest between large shareholders leads to a shorter debt maturity, yielding a better informative environment. In addition, our results imply that MLS may be an important factor in facilitating financing as investors associate these firms with less risk of extraction of private benefits.

Essa pesquisa busca investigar a influência de diferentes níveis de fatores na variância da maturidade do endividamento corporativo na América Latina. Ao todo, foram levantados cinco diferentes grupos (divididos em três níveis de influência) de variáveis que potencialmente determinam a maturidade do endividamento das empresas dos países estudados ao longo do período de 1996 a 2009. Foi utilizado o modelo linear hierárquico, que possibilita o aninhamento de variáveis em diferentes níveis – em que os níveis superiores influenciam os níveis inferiores. Ao longo do estudo, procedeu-se à análise fatorial com o objetivo de extrair fatores representativos do nível de desenvolvimento financeiro e da qualidade das instituições de Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Colômbia, México, Peru, Venezuela e Estados Unidos (países componentes da amostra). Os resultados sugerem que as variações ao longo do tempo e as variações entre as empresas são as maiores fontes de modificações na maturidade do endividamento. Além disso, o tamanho, a liquidez, a taxa real de juros e o nível de desenvolvimento financeiro do país se sobressaem como fatores que impactam de forma significativa a maturidade do endividamento corporativo. Finalmente, os fatores extraídos e a taxa real de juros impactaram indiretamente na maturidade do endividamento através de outras variáveis, a saber: oportunidades de crescimento, tamanho e liquidez. / This research investigates the influence of distinct factor´s levels in corporate debt maturity in Latin America. Five different variables groups (divided into three influence levels) that potentially determine the corporate debt maturity in the countries studied were collected over the period 1996 to 2009. We used Hierarchical Linear Modeling, which allows nesting of variables at different levels – in which the higher levels may influence the lower levels. Throughout the study, we proceeded to factor analysis in order to extract financial development and institutional quality factors in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Venezuela and the United States (countries belonging to the sample). The results suggest that variations over time and variations between firms are the major sources of changes in corporate debt maturity. Moreover, size, liquidity, the real interest rate and the financial development stand out as factors that impact significantly the corporate debt maturity. Finally, the extracted factors and the real interest rate indirectly impacted the corporate debt maturity by others variables, namely: growth opportunities, size and liquidity.

Essa pesquisa busca investigar a influência de diferentes níveis de fatores na variância da maturidade do endividamento corporativo na América Latina. Ao todo, foram levantados cinco diferentes grupos (divididos em três níveis de influência) de variáveis que potencialmente determinam a maturidade do endividamento das empresas dos países estudados ao longo do período de 1996 a 2009. Foi utilizado o modelo linear hierárquico, que possibilita o aninhamento de variáveis em diferentes níveis – em que os níveis superiores influenciam os níveis inferiores. Ao longo do estudo, procedeu-se à análise fatorial com o objetivo de extrair fatores representativos do nível de desenvolvimento financeiro e da qualidade das instituições de Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Colômbia, México, Peru, Venezuela e Estados Unidos (países componentes da amostra). Os resultados sugerem que as variações ao longo do tempo e as variações entre as empresas são as maiores fontes de modificações na maturidade do endividamento. Além disso, o tamanho, a liquidez, a taxa real de juros e o nível de desenvolvimento financeiro do país se sobressaem como fatores que impactam de forma significativa a maturidade do endividamento corporativo. Finalmente, os fatores extraídos e a taxa real de juros impactaram indiretamente na maturidade do endividamento através de outras variáveis, a saber: oportunidades de crescimento, tamanho e liquidez. / This research investigates the influence of distinct factor´s levels in corporate debt maturity in Latin America. Five different variables groups (divided into three influence levels) that potentially determine the corporate debt maturity in the countries studied were collected over the period 1996 to 2009. We used Hierarchical Linear Modeling, which allows nesting of variables at different levels – in which the higher levels may influence the lower levels. Throughout the study, we proceeded to factor analysis in order to extract financial development and institutional quality factors in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Venezuela and the United States (countries belonging to the sample). The results suggest that variations over time and variations between firms are the major sources of changes in corporate debt maturity. Moreover, size, liquidity, the real interest rate and the financial development stand out as factors that impact significantly the corporate debt maturity. Finally, the extracted factors and the real interest rate indirectly impacted the corporate debt maturity by others variables, namely: growth opportunities, size and liquidity.

Essa pesquisa busca investigar a influência de diferentes níveis de fatores na variância da maturidade do endividamento corporativo na América Latina. Ao todo, foram levantados cinco diferentes grupos (divididos em três níveis de influência) de variáveis que potencialmente determinam a maturidade do endividamento das empresas dos países estudados ao longo do período de 1996 a 2009. Foi utilizado o modelo linear hierárquico, que possibilita o aninhamento de variáveis em diferentes níveis – em que os níveis superiores influenciam os níveis inferiores. Ao longo do estudo, procedeu-se à análise fatorial com o objetivo de extrair fatores representativos do nível de desenvolvimento financeiro e da qualidade das instituições de Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Colômbia, México, Peru, Venezuela e Estados Unidos (países componentes da amostra). Os resultados sugerem que as variações ao longo do tempo e as variações entre as empresas são as maiores fontes de modificações na maturidade do endividamento. Além disso, o tamanho, a liquidez, a taxa real de juros e o nível de desenvolvimento financeiro do país se sobressaem como fatores que impactam de forma significativa a maturidade do endividamento corporativo. Finalmente, os fatores extraídos e a taxa real de juros impactaram indiretamente na maturidade do endividamento através de outras variáveis, a saber: oportunidades de crescimento, tamanho e liquidez. / This research investigates the influence of distinct factor´s levels in corporate debt maturity in Latin America. Five different variables groups (divided into three influence levels) that potentially determine the corporate debt maturity in the countries studied were collected over the period 1996 to 2009. We used Hierarchical Linear Modeling, which allows nesting of variables at different levels – in which the higher levels may influence the lower levels. Throughout the study, we proceeded to factor analysis in order to extract financial development and institutional quality factors in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Venezuela and the United States (countries belonging to the sample). The results suggest that variations over time and variations between firms are the major sources of changes in corporate debt maturity. Moreover, size, liquidity, the real interest rate and the financial development stand out as factors that impact significantly the corporate debt maturity. Finally, the extracted factors and the real interest rate indirectly impacted the corporate debt maturity by others variables, namely: growth opportunities, size and liquidity.

This thesis examines the effects of managerial overconfidence on corporate financing decisions. Overconfident managers tend to overestimate the mean of future cash flow and underestimate the volatility of future cash flow. We propose a novel time-varying measure of overconfidence, which is based on computational linguistic analysis of what the managers said (i.e. Chairman s Statement). The overconfidence of CEO and CFO is also constructed based on what the managers did (i.e. how they trade their own firms shares). We conduct three empirical studies that offer new insights into the roles of managerial overconfidence in the leverage decision (i.e. debt level), pecking order behaviour (i.e. the preference for debt over equity financing) and debt maturity decision (i.e. short-term debt vs. long-term debt). Study 1 documents a negative overconfidence-leverage relationship. This new finding suggests that debt conservatism associated with managerial overconfidence might be a potential explanation for the low leverage puzzle: some firms maintain low leverage, without taking tax benefits of debt, because overconfident managers believe that firm securities are undervalued by investors and thus are too costly (Malmendier, Tate and Yan, 2011). Study 2 finds managerial overconfidence leads to reverse pecking order preference especially in small firms, which sheds light on the pecking order puzzle that smaller firms with higher information costs surprisingly exhibit weaker pecking order preference. This new evidence is consistent with Hackbarth s (2008) theory that overconfident managers who underestimate the riskiness of earnings tend to prefer equity to debt financing. Study 3 finds managerial overconfidence leads to higher debt maturity. This evidence supports our proposition that overconfidence can mitigate the underinvestment problem (which is often the major concern of long-term debt investors) (Hackbarth, 2009), which in turn allows overconfident managers to use more and cheaper long-term debt. This evidence also implies that overconfidence may mitigate the agency cost of debt. Overall, our empirical analysis suggests that managerial overconfidence has significant incremental explanatory power for corporate financing decisions.

Cette thèse constituée de trois essais s’intéresse aux déterminants de la maturité de la dette des sociétés. Le premier essai examine le lien entre la structure de l’actionnariat et la maturité de la dette à partir d’un échantillon de sociétés françaises. Nos résultats montrent que le contrôle par la dette à court terme peut, dans une certaine mesure, se substituer aux mécanismes traditionnels de gouvernance tels que la structure de l’actionnariat. Le second essai étudie la relation entre la qualité de l’information financière et la maturité de la dette à partir d’un échantillon de sociétés européennes. Nous étudions particulièrement l’effet de la gestion des résultats sur la maturité de la dette. Nous montrons alors que la gestion des résultats a un effet négatif sur la dette à long terme dans la structure de dette des firmes. En outre, nous observons que le lien négatif entre la gestion des résultats et la dette à long terme ne tient que dans les pays de droit civil. Enfin, le troisième essai analyse dans le contexte français du co-commissariat aux comptes, si la présence d’auditeurs réputés dans le collège de commissaires aux comptes est associée à la maturité de la dette. Il ressort de cette étude que la présence des auditeurs du Big 4 est associée positivement à la dette à long terme. / This thesis consists of three essays aims to examine the determinants of corporate debt maturity. The first essay examines the link between ownership structure and debt maturity using a sample of French companies. Our results show that the monitoring by short-term debt can, to a certain extent, to be a substitute for traditional governance mechanisms such as ownership structure. The second essay examines the relation between financial reporting quality and debt maturity using a sample of European companies. We study specifically the effect of earnings management on debt maturity. We find that firms with high earnings management activities are associated with less long-term debt. In additional analysis, we observe that the negative link between earnings management and long-term debt holds only in code law countries. Finally, the third essay analyzes in the French context of joint audit, whether the presence of reputable auditors is associated with debt maturity. The study shows that appointing Big 4 auditors is positively associated with long term debt.

The purpose of this diploma thesis is to find an effective way of receivables management in a capital company running business in the field of agriculture. After thorough analysis of current state of receivables management several concepts of change and their application were proposed to effectively manage receivables.