Global ETD Search

1	Liberalization and the question of democracy in Algeria, 1979-1992 / Kapil, Arun. January 1999 (has links) Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Chicago, Dept. of Political Science, June 1999. / Includes bibliographical references. Also available on the Internet. Democracy Authoritarianism Algeria
2	Forging compromise business, parties, and regime change in Chile / Barrett, Patrick Stephen. January 1900 (has links) Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1997. / Subtitle on signature p.: Business, parties, and the state in Chile. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 506-567).
3	The breakdown of authoritarian regimes and the quest for democracy the case of Sierra Leone / Weller, Ben Franklin. January 1900 (has links) Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1997. / Typescript. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 236-250). Democracy Authoritarianism Sierra Leone
4	Political opposition and the transition from authoritarian rule the case of Indonesia / Aspinall, Edward Thomas. January 2000 (has links) Thesis (Ph. D.)--Australian National University, 2000. / "Australian Digital Theses Program." Caption title ; description based on the resource of 2004-09-20.
5	Authoritarianism Versus Democracy In Uzbekistan: Domestic And International Factors Aydin, Gulsen 01 February 2004 (has links) (PDF) The objective of this thesis is to analyze the authoritarian Karimov regime in post-Soviet Uzbekistan on a comprehensive basis and shed light on the domestic and international factors that has shaped this regime. The thesis consists of three main parts. The first part of the study defines the concepts of democracy and authoritarianism and provides the criteria to determine if a regime is democratic or authoritarian. The second part applies the theoretical framework developed in the first part to Uzbekistan. The third part deals with the factors that helped Karimov to strengthen his authoritarian rule in the country. The main argument of this study is that the incumbent leadership in Uzbekistan has failed to take steps to establish democracy in the country in post-Soviet period. The changes that were introduced proved to be only decorative, they lacked substance. The president of the country, Islam Karimov, has aimed at consolidating his own authority rather than establishing democracy and that his attempts to realize this aim resulted in the strengthening of executive branch in Uzbekistan at the expense of legislative and judiciary, silencing of the opposition forces, curtailment of the civil and political rights of the citizens, restriction of autonomy of civil society organizations and media. H General Social Sciences 1-99
6	Failed Democratic Experience In Kyrgyzstan: 1990-2000 Niazaliev, Ouran 01 September 2004 (has links) (PDF) This study seeks to analyze the process of transition and democratization in Kyrgyzstan from 1990 to 2000. The collapse of the Soviet Union opened new political perspectives for Kyrgyzstan and a chance to develop sovereign state based on democratic principles and values. Initially Kyrgyzstan attained some progress in building up a democratic state. However, in the second half of 1990s Kyrgyzstan shifted toward authoritarianism. Therefore, the full-scale transition to democracy has not been realized, and a well-functioning democracy has not been established. This study aims to focus on the impediments that led to the failure of establishing democracy in Kyrgyzstan. It analyzes the role of economy, political elites and political culture in the form of tribalism in Kyrgyzstan within the framework of the economic and political changes that have been undergoing since independence. The political and economic developments in Kyrgyzstan are discussed with specific reference to the hardships in economic transition, elite continuity and role of tribal and clan structures in present politics.
7	Pouvoir personnel et ressources politiques : Gaston Flosse en Polynesie francaise. / Personal Rule and Political Resources. Gaston Flosse in French Polynesia Bessard, Rudy 17 December 2013 (has links) L’entrepreneur politique tend à dominer un espace sociopolitique par le jeu stratégique d’une matrice de ressources politiques. Ainsi, le leadership du notable Gaston Flosse, dans la collectivité d’outre-mer de Polynésie française, présente les facettes d’un pouvoir personnel en République. Ce type de domination de l’espace polynésien est mis en évidence par la plasticité d’un leadership politique autoritaire, fondé sur de multiples ressources matérielles et symboliques. L’étude de ce leadership politique interroge l’exercice de la démocratie représentative à Tahiti et dans la Vème République. / The strategic mobilization of multidimensional political resources allows the political leader to take power in a political space. Then, the leader uses a combination of political capacities to keep the power and extend his domination. Thus, the political leadership of the Boss Gaston Flosse, in the overseas collectivity of French Polynesia, has become a personal rule inside the French Republic. The domination of the Polynesian sociopolitical space is illustrated by the plasticity of an authoritarian leadership, which questions the expressions of democracy in Tahiti, and in the French political regime. Leadership Ressources politiques Entrepreneur politique Pouvoir personnel Démocratie/autoritarisme Imaginaires politiques Outre-mers Polynésie française Gaston Flosse Tahiti Pouvoir Leadership – Political Resources Political Entrepreneur Personal Rule Democracy/Authoritarianism Political Imaginaries Pacific French Overseas Gaston Flosse Tahiti Power

1

Page generated in 0.0506 seconds