Aims and objectives: The research aims and objectives of this thesis were: (i) to review literature pertaining to different dermal exposure assessment methods; (ii) to assess dermal exposure of refinery workers to nickel and/or cobalt by making use of skin wipes as a removal method; (iii) to assess concurrently the skin condition of the above mentioned workers by measuring skin hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin surface pH, and (iv) to compare South African skin notations and sensitisation notations with those of other developed countries. Methods: Refinery workers from two base metal refineries participated in this study. Skin condition and dermal exposure was measured on different anatomical areas before, during and at the end of a work shift. Dermal exposure to nickel and/or cobalt was assessed with Ghostwipes TM as a removal method. Wipe samples of potentially contaminated surfaces in the workplace were also collected. Wipes were analysed for nickel and/or cobalt according to NIOSH method 9102, using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry. The assignment and use of skin notations and sensitisation notations in South African legislation and six other developed countries were compared. Results: To date, occupational dermal exposure has been reported for numerous substances by making use of surrogate skin methods (interception methods), removal methods and fluorescent tracer methods (in situ detection methods). From published literature it is evident that skin (dermal) wipes, as a removal method, are the most appropriate method to assess dermal exposure to metals. Varying degrees of skin dryness (low hydration indices) and impaired barrier function (high TEWL indices) are reported, with the hands being implicated the most. However, normal skin condition is also reported for some anatomical areas. Skin surface pH for all anatomical areas sampled decreased significantly during the shift, but remained in normal range. Dermal exposure to nickel occurred during the shift at the electro-winning plant of one refinery, while dermal co-exposure to cobalt and nickel occurred at the cobalt plant of the other refinery. At both of the refineries, cobalt and/or nickel was collected from the workers’ skin even before the shift. Also, dermal exposure to these metals was highly variable between individual workers. Skin notations in South African legislation had a mean agreement of between 42.9% and 45.8% with other countries, while agreement for sensitisation notations was only 3.6% between countries. / Thesis (Ph.D. (Occupational Hygiene))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.

Aims and objectives: The research aims and objectives of this thesis were: (i) to review literature pertaining to different dermal exposure assessment methods; (ii) to assess dermal exposure of refinery workers to nickel and/or cobalt by making use of skin wipes as a removal method; (iii) to assess concurrently the skin condition of the above mentioned workers by measuring skin hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin surface pH, and (iv) to compare South African skin notations and sensitisation notations with those of other developed countries. Methods: Refinery workers from two base metal refineries participated in this study. Skin condition and dermal exposure was measured on different anatomical areas before, during and at the end of a work shift. Dermal exposure to nickel and/or cobalt was assessed with Ghostwipes TM as a removal method. Wipe samples of potentially contaminated surfaces in the workplace were also collected. Wipes were analysed for nickel and/or cobalt according to NIOSH method 9102, using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry. The assignment and use of skin notations and sensitisation notations in South African legislation and six other developed countries were compared. Results: To date, occupational dermal exposure has been reported for numerous substances by making use of surrogate skin methods (interception methods), removal methods and fluorescent tracer methods (in situ detection methods). From published literature it is evident that skin (dermal) wipes, as a removal method, are the most appropriate method to assess dermal exposure to metals. Varying degrees of skin dryness (low hydration indices) and impaired barrier function (high TEWL indices) are reported, with the hands being implicated the most. However, normal skin condition is also reported for some anatomical areas. Skin surface pH for all anatomical areas sampled decreased significantly during the shift, but remained in normal range. Dermal exposure to nickel occurred during the shift at the electro-winning plant of one refinery, while dermal co-exposure to cobalt and nickel occurred at the cobalt plant of the other refinery. At both of the refineries, cobalt and/or nickel was collected from the workers’ skin even before the shift. Also, dermal exposure to these metals was highly variable between individual workers. Skin notations in South African legislation had a mean agreement of between 42.9% and 45.8% with other countries, while agreement for sensitisation notations was only 3.6% between countries. / Thesis (Ph.D. (Occupational Hygiene))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.

Copper exposure is known to be a rare cause of skin irritation and allergic reactions and according to our knowledge occupational dermal exposure to copper sulphate has not yet been characterised. As a result, the objectives of this study were to assess the dermal exposure of workers at a chemical industry to copper sulphate and to characterise the change in the their skin barrier function from before to the end of the work shift, as the skin’s barrier function can greatly influence the permeation of chemical substances. Methods: The change in skin barrier function of reactor workers, crystal and powder packaging workers at the chemical industry were assessed by measuring their dominant hand’s palm, back and wrist as well as their foreheads’ skin hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin surface pH before and at the end of the work shift. Commercial GhostwipesTM were used to collect dermal exposure samples from the same four anatomical areas before and at the end of the shift. Additional dermal exposure samples were collected from the palm and back of hand, prior to breaks 1 and 2. Surface wipe sampling was also conducted at several work and recreational areas of the chemical industry. Wipe samples were analysed by an accredited analytical laboratory, according to NIOSH method 9102 by means of Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry. Results: Changes in skin hydration of the workers and anatomical areas at the end of the work shift were highly variable, while in general TEWL increased and skin surface pH decreased. Copper was collected from the skin of all workers before the shift commenced, and dermal exposure increased throughout the work shift. All of the work and recreational areas from which surface samples were taken, were contaminated with copper. Conclusion: As a result of intermittent use of inadequate protective gloves and secondary skin contact with contaminated surfaces and work clothing, workers at the chemical industry are exposed to copper sulphate via the dermal exposure route. The decrease in the workers’ skin barrier function (increased TEWL) and skin surface pH is most likely the result of their dermal exposure to sulphuric acid, and may lead to enhanced dermal penetration. The low account of skin irritation or reaction incidences among these workers is contributed to their ethnicity as well as to the low sensitisation potential of copper. Recommendations on how to lower dermal exposure and improve workers’ skin barrier function are made. / MSc (Occupational Hygiene), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

Copper exposure is known to be a rare cause of skin irritation and allergic reactions and according to our knowledge occupational dermal exposure to copper sulphate has not yet been characterised. As a result, the objectives of this study were to assess the dermal exposure of workers at a chemical industry to copper sulphate and to characterise the change in the their skin barrier function from before to the end of the work shift, as the skin’s barrier function can greatly influence the permeation of chemical substances. Methods: The change in skin barrier function of reactor workers, crystal and powder packaging workers at the chemical industry were assessed by measuring their dominant hand’s palm, back and wrist as well as their foreheads’ skin hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin surface pH before and at the end of the work shift. Commercial GhostwipesTM were used to collect dermal exposure samples from the same four anatomical areas before and at the end of the shift. Additional dermal exposure samples were collected from the palm and back of hand, prior to breaks 1 and 2. Surface wipe sampling was also conducted at several work and recreational areas of the chemical industry. Wipe samples were analysed by an accredited analytical laboratory, according to NIOSH method 9102 by means of Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry. Results: Changes in skin hydration of the workers and anatomical areas at the end of the work shift were highly variable, while in general TEWL increased and skin surface pH decreased. Copper was collected from the skin of all workers before the shift commenced, and dermal exposure increased throughout the work shift. All of the work and recreational areas from which surface samples were taken, were contaminated with copper. Conclusion: As a result of intermittent use of inadequate protective gloves and secondary skin contact with contaminated surfaces and work clothing, workers at the chemical industry are exposed to copper sulphate via the dermal exposure route. The decrease in the workers’ skin barrier function (increased TEWL) and skin surface pH is most likely the result of their dermal exposure to sulphuric acid, and may lead to enhanced dermal penetration. The low account of skin irritation or reaction incidences among these workers is contributed to their ethnicity as well as to the low sensitisation potential of copper. Recommendations on how to lower dermal exposure and improve workers’ skin barrier function are made. / MSc (Occupational Hygiene), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014