Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-01-04T21:50:43Z No. of bitstreams: 1 ViniciusLucioDeAndrade_DISSERT.pdf: 2011559 bytes, checksum: d76ed99d9b00fe4aa965776047f0d81b (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-01-07T19:03:31Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 ViniciusLucioDeAndrade_DISSERT.pdf: 2011559 bytes, checksum: d76ed99d9b00fe4aa965776047f0d81b (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-07T19:03:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ViniciusLucioDeAndrade_DISSERT.pdf: 2011559 bytes, checksum: d76ed99d9b00fe4aa965776047f0d81b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-08-29 / A constru??o normativa do sistema de seguran?a p?blica na Constituinte de 1987-1988 preservou espa?os normativos paradoxais. Isto ?, as pol?cias militares vinculadas ao Ex?rcito com um estatuto jur?dico restritivo da cidadania do policial atrav?s de um modelo hier?rquico e disciplinar anacr?nico. Esta pesquisa parte da seguinte problem?tica: Como ? poss?vel adequar o sistema de constitucional de seguran?a p?blica, especificamente as Pol?cias Militares, aos paradigmas democr?ticos constru?dos pelo Constituinte origin?rio em 1988 e efetivar Direito ? Seguran?a P?blica sob estes moldes? As limita??es militaristas da Constitui??o permitiram a crescente militariza??o dos ?rg?os policiais, cultura organizacional e pr?ticas institucionais autorit?rias. Subjacente a isto, os problemas vinculados as dificuldades de efetiva??o do Direito ? Seguran?a P?blica, as greves das pol?cias militares, o ciclo incompleto de pol?tica passaram a exigir do sistema jur?dico-constitucional respostas adequadas. Utilizando-se do m?todo dial?gico e uma abordagem interdisciplinar da tem?tica, e teoricamente fundamentado na supera??o do juspositivismo constitucional normativista. Constatou-se que a legisla??o infraconstitucional constru?da foi insuficiente para suprir as lacunas sist?micas da norma constitucional, ao procurar a cria??o de um sistema ?nico de seguran?a p?blica sem dar devida amplitude ao princ?pio federativo e ampliar a autonomia dos estados federados, e nem mesmo conceder um status jur?dico democr?tico aos policiais militares. Os limites jur?dicos formais impostos pelo texto constitucional constru?ram um anacronismo jur?dico, as pol?cias militares. Assim, uma leitura democr?tica das institui??es policiais militares torna inconceb?vel a sua exist?ncia no ambiente normativo constitucional. Desse modo, reformar a Constitui??o com o objetivo de desmilitarizar as pol?cias e realizar um redesenho normativo do sistema de seguran?a p?blica ? fundamental para democracia constitucional brasileira / The normative construction of the public security system in the Constituent Assembly of 1987-1988 preserved paradoxical normative space, the military police linked to the Army with a restrictive legal statute of the police offices citizenship through a hierarchical and disciplinary model that is anachronistic. This research originates from the following problem: How is it possible to tailor the constitutional system of public safety, specifically the Military Police, according to the democratic paradigms constructed by the Constituent from 1988 and carry the right to public safety under these molds? The militarists limitations of the Constitution allowed the growing militarization of police departments, organizational culture and authoritarian institutional practices. Underlying this, the problems related to difficulties in realization of Right to Public Safety, the strikes of the military police, the incomplete policy cycle started demanding from the constitutional-legal system appropriate responses. Utilizing the dialogical method and an interdisciplinary approach to the subject, and theoretically grounded in overcoming of the constitutional normativist juspositivism.It was found that the constructed infraconstitutional legislation was insufficient to supply the systemic shortcomings of constitutional law, when looking to create a single system of public security without giving due scope to the federal principle and expand the autonomy the Federated States, and even grant democratic legal status to the military police. Formal legal limits imposed by the Constitution constructed a legal anachronism, the military police. Thus, a democratic reading of military police institutions becomes inconceivable its existence in the constitutional regulatory environment. Thus, reform the Constitution in order to demilitarize the police and conduct a normative redesign of the public security system is fundamental to Brazilian constitutional democracy