Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-03-03T19:37:37Z No. of bitstreams: 1 AnnaLiviaDeMedeirosDantas_DISSERT.pdf: 2504084 bytes, checksum: 8f614fbee3a9881121a3800224934cf2 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-03-07T19:10:20Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 AnnaLiviaDeMedeirosDantas_DISSERT.pdf: 2504084 bytes, checksum: 8f614fbee3a9881121a3800224934cf2 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-07T19:10:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AnnaLiviaDeMedeirosDantas_DISSERT.pdf: 2504084 bytes, checksum: 8f614fbee3a9881121a3800224934cf2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-12-17 / O estudo objetivou analisar os diagn?sticos de enfermagem do dom?nio seguran?a/prote??o da Nanda Internacional presentes nos pacientes internados em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Trata-se de um estudo transversal, realizado no complexo de terapia intensiva de um hospital universit?rio no Nordeste do Brasil. A pesquisa ocorreu em duas etapas. A primeira etapa consistiu na coleta de dados, por meio de um formul?rio de entrevista e de exame f?sico, com 86 pacientes internados na referida unidade, durante os meses de dezembro de 2013 a maio de 2014. As planilhas foram constru?das no Software Microsoft Office Excel 2010, nas quais foram assinaladas, pela pesquisadora deste estudo, a presen?a ou aus?ncia das caracter?sticas definidoras, fatores relacionados e fatores de risco dos 31 diagn?sticos estudados. Na segunda etapa, realizada entre julho e agosto de 2014, as planilhas foram enviadas a tr?s diagnosticadores, previamente treinados, para a realiza??o da infer?ncia diagn?stica. Os dados foram analisados por meio de estat?stica descritiva e inferencial para os diagn?sticos que apresentaram frequ?ncias maiores que 50%, com aux?lio do IBM SPSS Statistic vers?o 20.0 for Windows.O projeto recebeu parecer favor?vel no 440/414 e Certificado de Apresenta??o para Aprecia??o ?tica no 22955113.2.0000.5292. Os resultados apontaram a presen?a de 29 diagn?sticos de enfermagem do dom?nio seguran?a/prote??o na clientela internada em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva, dentre os quais cinco estiveram presentes em 100% dos pacientes, a saber: Risco de contamina??o, Risco de les?o, Risco de quedas, Risco de resposta al?rgica e Risco de trauma. Os diagn?sticos que apresentaram frequ?ncia superior a 50% foram: Risco de infec??o, Risco de olho seco, Risco de envenenamento, Risco de trauma vascular, Integridade da pele prejudicada, Denti??o prejudicada, Risco de sangramento, Risco de desequil?brio na temperatura corporal, Risco de les?o por posicionamento perioperat?rio, Integridade tissular prejudicada, Risco de disfun??o neurovascular perif?rica, Risco de resposta adversa ao meio de contraste com iodo, Risco de choque e Risco de aspira??o. Para esses diagn?sticos, foram identificados 35 fatores de risco, 11 caracter?sticas definidoras e tr?s fatores relacionados que apresentaram associa??o estat?stica significativa com os diagn?sticos estudados. Para os diagn?sticos: Risco de contamina??o, Risco de les?o, Risco de quedas, Risco de resposta al?rgica, Risco de 7 trauma, Risco de infec??o, Risco de olho seco e Risco de envenenamento n?o houve associa??o com nenhuma de seus fatores de risco. Conclui-se que a maioria dos diagn?sticos de enfermagem do dom?nio seguran?a/prote??o apresentam-se prevalentes nos pacientes cr?ticos, com aten??o especial para os diagn?sticos de risco. Ocorreu associa??o significativa entre esses diagn?sticos e seus componentes. Destaca-se, assim, que o levantamento desse perfil contribui com pistas relevantes para a infer?ncia dos diagn?sticos de enfermagem priorit?rios do dom?nio seguran?a/prote??o na popula??o estudada, auxiliando a pr?xis da enfermagem e estimulando o conhecimento a respeito do assunto. / The study aimed to analyze the field of nursing diagnoses safety / protection of NANDA International present in patients in the Intensive Care Unit. This is a crosssectional study in intensive care complex of a university hospital in northeastern Brazil. The research took place in two stages. The first step was to collect data through an interview form and physical examination, with 86 patients admitted to the unit, during the months of December 2013 to May 2014. Spreadsheets were built in Microsoft Office Excel 2010 Software in which were marked by the researcher of this study, the presence or absence of defining characteristics, related factors and risk factors of the 31 studied diagnoses. In the second stage, held between July and August 2014, the sheets were sent to three diagnosticians, previously trained to perform the diagnostic inference. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics for the diagnoses that showed higher frequencies than 50%, using IBM SPSS version 20.0 for Statistic Windows.O project was approved by the 440/414 and Presentation Certificate for Ethics Assessment number 22955113 .2.0000.5292. The results indicated the presence of 29 field of nursing diagnoses safety / protection in hospital clientele in the Intensive Care Unit, of which five were present in 100% of patients, namely: Risk of contamination, injury risk, falls risk,risk of allergic response and risk of trauma. Diagnoses that presented more frequently than 50% were: Risk of infection, dry eye risk, poisoning risk, vascular trauma risk, impaired skin integrity, impaired dentition, bleeding risk, risk imbalance in body temperature, Risk perioperative positioning injury, impaired tissue integrity, peripheral neurovascular dysfunction Risk, Risk adverse response to contrast media with iodine, shock Hazard and Risk of aspiration. For these analyzes, we identified 35 risk factors, 11 defining characteristics and three related factors showed statistically significant association with the studied diagnoses. For diagnostics: Risk of contamination, injury risk, falls risk, allergic response risk, trauma Risk, Risk of infection, dry eye risk and risk poisoning there was no association with any of their risk factors. We conclude that most of the area of nursing diagnoses safety / protection feature is prevalent in critically ill patients, with special attention to the risk diagnoses. There was a significant association between these diagnoses and its components. It is noteworthy, therefore, that the lifting of this profile contributes relevant clues to the inference of the priority nursing diagnoses domain safety / protection in the study population, supporting the practice of nursing and stimulating knowledge on the subject.