Occupational data for industrial labour forces reveal sexual division of labour in the form of occupational segregation by sex (OSS). There are two principal dimensions of this phenomenon. First, male and female workers are distributed differently among occupations, an aspect of OSS referred to as occupational differentiation by sex (ODS). Second, there is considerable variation in the internal sex compositions of occupations, such that women are overrepresented in a few jobs, and underrepresented in others. This dimension of OSS is referred to as occupational sex-typing (OST). Some patterns of OSS suggest that male and female workers are not merely segregated into different jobs, but also stratified into occupations readily ranked according to conventional criteria. Such sexual stratification of the labour force is referred to as sexual inequality of occupational status (SIS). Although economic, socialization, discrimination, interdisciplinary, and ecological explanations of change in OSS and SIS identify important determinants of these phenomena, none of these perspectives provides an adequate theory of change in OSS and SIS. As well, the various approaches have led to contradictory conclusions about trends in OSS and SIS. Some authors argue that there has been no change in the degree of these phenomena. Others contend that OSS and SIS have grown more pronounced, while yet others claim declines in these phenomena. Much of the confusion concerning trends in OSS and SIS results from methodological inadequacies, which render inconclusive many of the findings of previous research. The thesis of this study is that there should be inverse relationships between the level of industrialization and both OSS and SIS. Specifically, it is argued that (1) the development of machine technology tends to eliminate the necessity to select workers for some jobs on the basis of strength, i.e., usually by sex; (2) the commitment to productivity characteristic of industrial societies implies hiring and promoting workers on the basis of their probable contribution to production; (3) the industrial urban milieu is characterized by conditions conducive to the employment and advancement of women (e.g., low birth rate, career opportunities); and (4) the bureaucratization accompanying industrialization ideally implies the selection and promotion of workers on the basis of achieved qualifications, determined by formalized, calculable standards, rather than on such traditional, ascriptive, and often economically irrational, criteria as sex. Accordingly, it is predicted that ODS, OST, and SIS will be inversely related to technological development, productivity, urbanization, and bureaucratization, and that as the levels of the latter dimensions of industrialization increase over time the degree of ODS, OST, and SIS will decline. Indexes of each dimension of industrialization and of JDDS, OST, and SIS are calculated with official Canadian data for the census years 1891 through 1971. The results are graphed and correlated, and subjected to regression and trend analysis. Generally, the findings are consistent with the thesis of inverse relationships between both OSS and SIS and each dimension of industrialization. Declines in OSS, however, are slight, with considerable sexual division of labour remaining at the end of the period studied. The theoretical and methodological implications of these findings are discussed, and several directions for subsequent research indicated. / Arts, Faculty of / Sociology, Department of / Unknown

No description available.

Today it is no longer considered socially acceptable to blatantly endorse racist beliefs or actions. However, despite this apparent change in our collective social attitude, racial conflict still exists. This may be due, in part, to a modern type of racism that is believed to result from the simultaneous endorsement of two conflicting popular U.S. values, egalitarianism and individualism. This conflict creates ambivalence that may result in different actions toward minorities depending on the context of the situation. This study examines the relationship between modern racism and the context of the situation for hiring preferences for White verses Hispanic job applicants. Participants were pretested on the Modern Racism scale, and approximately two weeks later they rated job applicant resumes. It was predicted that when the stimulus resume had a Hispanic man's name and photo on it, those participants who scored high on the Modern Racism scale would rate the stimulus resume differently than the participants who scored low on the Modern Racism scale. It was predicted that presenting the Hispanic man's resume first would create a context where no social guidelines exist and the racially ambivalent participant would rate the applicant lower than normal without fear of appearing racist. Following, we predicted that presenting the Hispanic man's resume last, after two White applicant's resumes, would create a context in which race is highly salient and the racially ambivalent participant would rate it higher than normal. Of the 104 participants, 75 identified themselves as White. These 75 participants were used in data analyses. Hierarchical multiple regression was performed to examine if modern racism, ethnic background of the applicant and context of the situation were moderators in hiring judgments. The significant three-way interaction suggests that participants who scored high on modern racism rated the resume with a Hispanic man's photo on it lower than the same resume with a White man's photo on it when they reviewed it last, after two other White applicants' resumes with better credentials. These findings suggest that modern racism toward Hispanics exists and may be an important correlate of discrimination toward Hispanics. This suggests that there is a need for further research on this topic.

In this thesis, I analyse the gender earnings gap in South Africa using Labour Force Survey (LFS) data, for the period between 2001 and 2005. In addition to providing estimates of the gender earnings differential at the mean of the wage distribution (using a pooled regression), I also provide quantile regression estimates to account for the gap at different points of the distribution. To further explore reasons for the gender earnings gap, I separate the male and female earnings equations and employ a decomposition technique. This allows me to determine the proportion of the gap that is not explained by differences in observable characteristics between men and women. The 'unexplained' part of the earnings gap is suggestive of gender discrimination in the labour market. Using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) the pooled regression (controlling for sample selection), indicates an increase in the gender pay gap between 2001 and 2005. In turn, the quantile regression estimates for the period also illustrate a widening gender earnings differential throughout the distribution, except at the mean. By contrast, the descriptive statistics and the separated male and female earnings estimations show a decrease in the earnings gap over the period. Given that the pooled regression assumes the same returns to observable characteristics for males and females, which I reject through the use of a Chow test, the results from the separated estimations hold more weight. The Oaxaca (1973) decomposition on the separated male and female earnings estimations illustrates that the 'unexplained' component of the gap accounts for a greater proportion of the gap than the 'explained' component in both years. Furthermore, the 'unexplained' proportion of the gap increased in the period, while the 'explained' proportion decreased. Thus, if the 'unexplained' part of the gap is considered to be a measure of discrimination, then the data indicates an increase in discrimination in earnings between the sexes over the period 2001 to 2005, even though there was a narrowing of the gender earnings differential. / Thesis (M.Com.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, 2008.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 2004. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 96-104).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--UCLA, 2008. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 147-150).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Notre Dame, 2005. / Thesis directed by Teresa Ghilarducci for the Department of Economics. "July 2005." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 125-128).

Thesis (LLM)--University of Stellenbosch, 2005. / Bibliography. Also available via the Internet.

Recent reviews of research on employee selection have shown that both sex-role stereotypes and physical attractiveness stereotypes have pronounced effects on the personnel evaluations received by attractive or unattractive male or female applicants when applying for particular jobs. With the exception of one recent study by Beehr and Gilmore (1982), however, previous research has neglected to identify jobs for which physical attractiveness (PA) was relevant and jobs for which PA was irrelevant when investigating the effects of physical attractiveness stereotypes on employment decisions. The present research examined sex-role stereotypes and PA-stereotypes using appropriately sex-typed and PA relevancy-typed jobs. The second purpose of the research was to extend the findings that the causal attributions made concerning a person’s success and/or failure at a particular task are a function of the sex-congruency of the task. If physical attractiveness stereotypes are as prevalent as sex-role stereotypes, then the attributions made by raters concerning successful or unsuccessful performance in PA-congruent tasks should be as pervasive as the attributions made for sex-congruent tasks. The final purpose of the research addressed a deficiency in the employee selection literature. While the biasing effects that physical attractiveness has on selection decisions are well documented, only one study could be found that attempted to control or eliminate this bias. Hence, this study employed a halo reduction technique, namely, the explicit rating of the irrelevant halo producing factor, in an attempt to purge from a rater's system the bias produced in job-related ratings by a job applicant's physical attractiveness. In Experiment 1, each of 68 subjects rated the suitability of one applicant for masculine, feminine, and neuter sex-typed jobs. Each resume was identical with the exception of the systematic manipulation of the applicant's sex. As expected, sex-role stereotypes had a strong influence on personnel decisions, as well as recommendations of alternatives to employment and subjects' causal attributions of applicants' assumed successful and unsuccessful job performance. In Experiment 2, a 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 2 (Purge x Photo Attractiveness x Applicant Sex x Subject Sex x Job Sex-Type x PA-Relevancy) design was employed. Subjects were 304 undergraduate students. Each resume was identical with the exception of the systematic manipulation of the applicant's sex and attractiveness. As predicted, personnel decisions once again reflected the operation of sex-role stereotypes. Additionally, subjects' evaluations reflected the influence of a physical attractiveness stereotype that affected employment decisions, overall employment potential, and causal attributions of applicants' job successes and failures. Limited but promising results were found for the purging technique which was designed to reduce the bias in personnel decisions that results from an applicant's attractiveness. / Ph. D.

No description available.