For this dissertation, I measured how plant communities in Appalachian forests responded to disturbances caused by forest management activities. I had two primary objectives including (1) testing theories of biological diversity and invasions by nonnative species; and (2) providing empirical data that will help guide the sustainable use of forest resources. This work is part of the Southern Appalachian Silviculture and Biodiversity (SASAB) experiment that was established in the early 1990s to investigate ecosystem responses to a gradient of timber harvesting disturbances. Ranging from undisturbed controls to silvicultural clearcuts, the disturbance gradient is replicated at sites located throughout the Appalachian mountains of Virginia and West Virginia. The plant community was sampled across a wide range of spatial scales (2 hectares to 1 m2) using a nested sampling design and was also sampled at three times including pre-disturbance, one year post-disturbance, and ten year post-disturbance. For one element of the study I tested modern theories of biological invasions and investigated how the forest disturbance gradient interacted with species diversity to influence invasion by nonnative species (Chapter 2). Contrary to popular ecological theories of biotic resistance, the most diverse sites tended to be more easily invaded following intense canopy disturbance. Interestingly, none of the sites in this study were dominated by invasive plants, which led me to ask whether dominant tree species in forests provided resistance to nonnative plant establishment and growth through the quality of the litter they produce. I also asked how might animals that are known to alter litter layers interact with dominant tree species to influence plant invasions. Therefore, I conducted an experiment investigating how changes in litter from dominant tree species and invasions by nonnative earthworms might influence invasibility of forests using forest floor mesocosms (Chapter 3). I found that plant invasion was inhibited by native oak litter even when earthworms were present, suggesting that oak forests may resist plant invasions via oak tree litter. In contrast, plant invasion was greater under invasive tree litter and earthworm activity tended to facilitate invasive plant success only under invasive tree litter. I was also interested in understanding how disturbance might alter relationships between local and regional diversity. The long-term data of the forest disturbance experiment allowed me to investigate how local species richness is mediated by regional species richness after disturbance and during forest community development (Chapter 4). Local richness depended strongly on regional richness only after disturbance via colonization of species, but this relationship changed during forest aggradation. These results suggest that regional species pools are important to maintain local diversity following disturbance, but that local interactions (through canopy closure of dominant trees) exert control over species diversity during community reorganization. Lastly, I tested current theories on how diversity influences compositional stability after disturbance (Chapter 5). Disturbance consistently resulted in decreased compositional stability, but diversity was associated with stability in complex ways, which depended on how stability was measured and at what scale. Species-rich areas were in some instances less stable; in other instances areas with intermediate levels of diversity were more stable. These results suggest that disturbance causes shifts in species composition via colonization, but the ways in which diversity of sites influences compositional stability is complex and depends on methods used and the scales of observation. Taken together, these results suggest that disturbance influences invasibility, species saturation, and compositional stability of ecological communities. These properties change immediately following disturbance, and during forest development and canopy closure. Data from this project were useful in testing existing theories of community ecology, and may ultimately prove useful for forest managers as they decide how to protect biodiversity while planning for other uses of forest resources. Overall, these results suggest that colonization of species is the primary process driving plant community patterns in Appalachian forests following disturbance. / Ph. D.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-07-29T16:21:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao parte 1 Thaisa Sala Michelan.pdf: 38222 bytes, checksum: 2f8d3a6cb8df8f1c42d663b0b5323ef6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-05-28 / Exotic species represent strong threats to biodiversity. This concern is especially valid in freshwater ecosystems due to their high biodiversity and the highest rates of extinction, compared with terrestrial and marine ecosystems. The increasing habitat complexity provided by the presence of macrophytes may partially explain the high diversity of aquatic ecosystems. However, depending on the density and other particular characteristics of these plant, the diversity may be negatively affected. In this context, Urochloa subquadripara, a species native to Africa, is an aquatic macrophyte weed occurring in various natural and artificial aquatic ecosystems in America. In a small scale, the occurrence of this exotic species increases with reducing natives species richness; however, in a large scale U. subquadripara invades sites with more richness of native species. This controversy is typical of observational studies in invasion biology and it demand experiments to test effects of abiotic and biotic resistance on the invasive potential of this exotic. Accordingly, two experiments were conducted in order to test the following hypotheses: (i) the regeneration and colonization of U. subquadripara decreases with increasing time of exposure to dry, (ii) fragments of the apical part of this species, when compared with those of the basal part, have higher viability and colonization potential (first experiment) and (iii) the invasiveness of aquatic environments by U. subquadripara is negatively influenced by the richness and abundance of native species (second experiment). Our results supported all of our hypotheses: U. subquadripara showed high resistance to desiccation, and the fragments of the apical part were those which had higher viability and colonization potential. In addition, both richness and abundance of native species affected negatively the invasive potential of this exotic macrophyte. The second experiment demonstrated that the effect of richness and abundance limited the development of U. subquadripara, although such effect was not sufficient to prevent the invasion of macrophyte communities by this species. Based on these results, it appears that the population growth of U. subquadripara is greater in disturbed sites, mainly those affected by drought, which in general, have lower abundance and diversity of native species. / Espécies exóticas representam fortes ameaças à biodiversidade. Essa preocupação é especialmente válida em ecossistemas aquáticos continentais em função da elevada biodiversidade e das maiores taxas de extinção, quando comparados com ecossistemas terrestres e marinhos. O aumento da complexidade dos habitats promovido pela presença de macrófitas aquáticas pode explicar em parte a elevada diversidade dos ecossistemas aquáticos. No entanto, dependendo das densidades e de outras características espécies-específicas dessas plantas, a diversidade pode ser negativamente afetada. Nesse contexto, Urochloa subquadripara, espécie nativa da África, é uma macrófita aquática infestante de vários ecossistemas aquáticos naturais e artificiais na América. Em pequena escala espacial, a ocorrência dessa exótica aumenta com a redução do número de espécies nativas, já em grande escala U. subquadripara invade locais com maior riqueza de espécies nativas. Essa controvérsia é típica de estudos observacionais em biologia de invasões sendo necessária a realização de experimentos para testar efeitos da resistência abiótica e biótica sobre o potencial invasor de exóticas. Nesse sentido, foram realizados dois experimentos, com o objetivo de testar as seguintes hipóteses: (i) a regeneração e colonização de U. subquadripara diminui com o aumento do tempo de exposição a seca; (ii) os fragmentos da parte apical dessa espécie, quando comparados com aqueles da parte basal, apresentam maior viabilidade e potencial de colonização (primeiro experimento) e (iii) a invasibilidade de ambientes aquáticos por U. subquadripara é influenciada negativamente pela riqueza e abundância de espécies nativas (segundo experimento). De modo geral, todas as hipóteses foram aceitas: U. subquadripara apresentou alta resistência a dessecação, sendo que os fragmentos da parte apical foram os que apresentaram maior viabilidade e potencial de colonização e tanto a riqueza como a abundância de espécies afetaram negativamente o potencial invasor dessa exótica. Esse último experimento demonstrou que, apesar de limitar o desenvolvimento de U. subquadripara, o efeito da riqueza e abundância de nativas não é suficiente para impedir a invasão de comunidades de macrófitas por essa espécie. Com base nesses resultados, infere-se que o crescimento populacional de U. subquadripara é maior em locais perturbados, principalmente por distúrbios como a seca que, em geral, também apresentam menor abundância e diversidade de espécies nativas.