• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 119
  • 117
  • 113
  • 10
  • 10
  • 6
  • 4
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 574
  • 166
  • 110
  • 93
  • 79
  • 71
  • 69
  • 67
  • 55
  • 52
  • 47
  • 45
  • 43
  • 43
  • 41
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
131

Mixed Roman Domination in Graphs

Ahangar, H. Abdollahzadeh, Haynes, Teresa W., Valenzuela-Tripodoro, J. C. 01 October 2017 (has links)
Let G= (V, E) be a simple graph with vertex set V and edge set E. A mixed Roman dominating function (MRDF) of G is a function f: V∪ E→ { 0 , 1 , 2 } satisfying the condition every element x∈ V∪ E for which f(x) = 0 is adjacent or incident to at least one element y∈ V∪ E for which f(y) = 2. The weight of a MRDF f is ω(f) = ∑ x∈V∪Ef(x). The mixed Roman domination number of G is the minimum weight of a mixed Roman dominating function of G. In this paper, we initiate the study of the mixed Roman domination number and we present bounds for this parameter. We characterize the graphs attaining an upper bound and the graphs having small mixed Roman domination numbers.
132

A Polynomial Time Algorithm for Downhill and Uphill Domination

Deering, Jessie, Haynes, Teresa W., Hedetniemi, Stephen T., Jamieson, William 01 September 2017 (has links)
Degree constraints on the vertices of a path allow for the definitions of uphill and downhill paths. Specifically, we say that a path P = vi, v2,⋯ vk+1 is a downhill path if for every i, 1 ≤ i ≤ k, deg(vi) ≥ deg(v1+1). Conversely, a path π = u1, u2,⋯ uk+1 is an uphill path if for every i, 1 ≤ i ≤ k, deg(ui) ≤ deg(ui+1). The downhill domination number of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a set S of vertices such that every vertex in V lies on a downhill path from some vertex in S. The uphill domination number is defined as expected. We give a polynomial time algorithm to find a minimum downhill dominating set and a minimum uphill dominating set for any graph.
133

Global Domination Edge Critical Graphs

Desormeaux, Wyatt J., Haynes, Teresa W., Van Der Merwe, Lucas 01 September 2017 (has links)
A set S of vertices in a graph G is a global dominating set of G if 5 simultaneously dominates both G and its complement G. The minimum cardinality of a global dominating set of G is the global domination number of G. We study the graphs for which removing any arbitrary edge from G and adding it to G decreases the global domination number.
134

Downhill and Uphill Domination in Graphs

Deering, Jessie, Haynes, Teresa W., Hedetniemi, Stephen T., Jamieson, William 01 February 2017 (has links)
Placing degree constraints on the vertices of a path yields the definitions of uphill and downhill paths. Specifically, we say that a path π = v1, v2, ⋯ vk+1 is a downhill path if for every i, 1 ≤ i ≤ k, deg(v1) ≥ deg(vi+1). Conversely, a path π = u1, u2, ⋯ uk+1 is an uphill path if for every i, 1 ≤ i ≤ k, deg(u1) ≤ deg(ui+1). The downhill domination number of a graph G is defined to be the minimum cardinality of a set S of vertices such that every vertex in V lies on a downhill path from some vertex in S. The uphill domination number is defined as expected. We explore the properties of these invariants and their relationships with other invariants. We also determine a Vizing-like result for the downhill (respectively, uphill) domination numbers of Cartesian products.
135

Les conflits de cadres à Fret SNCF (2010-2015). Sociologie d’une lutte pour la construction de sens. / Conflicts between executives at Fret SNCF (2010-2015). Sociology of struggle for constructing meaning.

Besse, Isabelle 08 January 2019 (has links)
Le projet cherche à comprendre de quelle manière chacun dans l'entreprise concilie les objectifs parfois contradictoires de rentabilité, sécurité et bien-être au travail, à travers deux études de cas : le retour d'expérience des évènements sécurité et l'évaluation des risques psychosociaux. Le terrain cible plus particulièrement les cadres à Fret SNCF dans les années 2010. / The project aims to understand how everyone in a company manage to conciliate objectives that can be sometimes contradictory, like profitability, security, well-being at work, through two case studies : feedback management of security events, evaluation of psychosocial risks. Field concern profesionnals in Fret SNCF in the 2010's.
136

Total Domination Cover Rubbling

Beeler, Robert A., Haynes, Teresa W., Henning, Michael A., Keaton, Rodney 15 September 2020 (has links)
Let G be a connected simple graph with vertex set V and a distribution of pebbles on the vertices of V. The total domination cover rubbling number of G is the minimum number of pebbles, so that no matter how they are distributed, it is possible that after a sequence of pebbling and rubbling moves, the set of vertices with pebbles is a total dominating set of G. We investigate total domination cover rubbling in graphs and determine bounds on the total domination cover rubbling number.
137

Cost Effective Domination in Graphs

McCoy, Tabitha Lynn 15 December 2012 (has links) (PDF)
A set S of vertices in a graph G = (V,E) is a dominating set if every vertex in V \ S is adjacent to at least one vertex in S. A vertex v in a dominating set S is said to be it cost effective if it is adjacent to at least as many vertices in V \ S as it is in S. A dominating set S is cost effective if every vertex in S is cost effective. The minimum cardinality of a cost effective dominating set of G is the cost effective domination number of G. In addition to some preliminary results for general graphs, we give lower and upper bounds on the cost effective domination number of trees in terms of their domination number and characterize the trees that achieve the upper bound. We show that every value of the cost effective domination number between these bounds is realizable.
138

Locating-Domination in Complementary Prisms.

Holmes, Kristin Renee Stone 09 May 2009 (has links) (PDF)
Let G = (V (G), E(G)) be a graph and G̅ be the complement of G. The complementary prism of G, denoted GG̅, is the graph formed from the disjoint union of G and G̅ by adding the edges of a perfect matching between the corresponding vertices of G and G̅. A set D ⊆ V (G) is a locating-dominating set of G if for every u ∈ V (G)D, its neighborhood N(u)⋂D is nonempty and distinct from N(v)⋂D for all v ∈ V (G)D where v ≠ u. The locating-domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a locating-dominating set of G. In this thesis, we study the locating-domination number of complementary prisms. We determine the locating-domination number of GG̅ for specific graphs and characterize the complementary prisms with small locating-domination numbers. We also present bounds on the locating-domination numbers of complementary prisms.
139

Double Domination of Complementary Prisms.

Vaughan, Lamont D 12 August 2008 (has links) (PDF)
The complementary prism of a graph G is obtained from a copy of G and its complement G̅ by adding a perfect matching between the corresponding vertices of G and G̅. For any graph G, a set D ⊆ V (G) is a double dominating set (DDS) if that set dominates every vertex of G twice. The double domination number, denoted γ×2(G), is the cardinality of a minimum double dominating set of G. We have proven results on graphs of small order, specific families and lower bounds on γ×2(GG̅).
140

Italian Domination in Complementary Prisms

Russell, Haley D 01 May 2018 (has links) (PDF)
Let $G$ be any graph and let $\overline{G}$ be its complement. The complementary prism of $G$ is formed from the disjoint union of a graph $G$ and its complement $\overline{G}$ by adding the edges of a perfect matching between the corresponding vertices of $G$ and $\overline{G}$. An Italian dominating function on a graph $G$ is a function such that $f \, : \, V \to \{ 0,1,2 \}$ and for each vertex $v \in V$ for which $f(v)=0$, it holds that $\sum_{u \in N(v)} f(u) \geq 2$. The weight of an Italian dominating function is the value $f(V)=\sum_{u \in V(G)}f(u)$. The minimum weight of all such functions on $G$ is called the Italian domination number. In this thesis we will study Italian domination in complementary prisms. First we will present an error found in one of the references. Then we will define the small values of the Italian domination in complementary prisms, find the value of the Italian domination number in specific families of graphs complementary prisms, and conclude with future problems.

Page generated in 0.109 seconds