Drinking water and wastewater industries are facing a nationwide workforce shortfall of qualified treatment plant operators due to factors including the en masse retirement of baby boomers and the tightening of regulatory requirements regarding the hands-on experience required prior to licensure. Rural areas are hardest hit due to the lack of educational and experiential opportunities available to them within a reasonable proximity. Using a variety of demographic and industry data, a geographic analysis of Kentucky was conducted to assess the viability of the traditional classroom delivery model versus a hybrid experiential and distance learning educational model (HEDLEM). Although this analysis indicates that population density is the dominant indicator for most of the parameters used in this study, the bulk of the workforce needs in the state are distributed throughout rural areas with lower population densities. While the number and geographic distribution of community colleges in the state would appear to support the viability of campus-based workforce development programs, this study demonstrates the limitations of this model in addressing the needs of the water and wastewater workforce, where a significant workplace-associated experiential requirement exists. This limitation is exaggerated in rural areas, which have a demonstrated statewide need. This study indicates that a sufficient recruitment pool exists for the program based on the anticipated

A bench-scale study of the degradation of four selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) was carried out using UV and UV/H₂O₂ treatment employing low pressure (LP) and medium pressure (MP) lamps. The target substances included the pharmaceutical compounds ibuprofen, naproxen, and gemfibrozil, along with the bactericide triclosan. There were four main objectives of the study, as follows: to evaluate the removal of the target compounds using UV irradiation alone and UV/H₂O₂, to determine the reaction kinetics for direct and indirect photolysis of each selected compound, to determine the influence of major water quality parameters on the efficacy of treatment, and to compare the applied UV and UV/H₂O₂ doses to those that have been found to be effective for disinfection and removal of taste and odour compounds, respectively. For initial ultra-pure water experiments the target compounds were spiked at concentrations of approximately 250 µg/L (~1 µM). In latter ultra-pure water experiments and in the partially-treated water experiments, the selected PPCPs were spiked at a lower range (c~500-1000 ng/L), which is more representative of reported environmental concentrations. In an ultra-pure water matrix, a high LP fluence of 1000 mJ/cm² caused only triclosan to substantially degrade. Furthermore, with LP-UV/H₂O₂ only triclosan and naproxen had average percent removals above 60% at a typical disinfection fluence of 40 mJ/cm² with 100 mg/L H₂O₂. Complete degradation of all four compounds in ultra-pure water was achieved with very high fluences (compared to those used for UV disinfection) with MP-UV alone (at or above 1000 mJ/cm²) or with relatively high fluences for MP-UV/H₂O₂ (200-300 mJ/cm²) with 10 mg/L H₂O₂. Overall, when compared at similar applied fluences, the MP lamp was much more effective than the LP lamp. Furthermore, the addition of H₂O₂ typically increased removal rates, in some cases substantially, through formation and subsequent reaction of the PPCP with the •OH radical. When target substances were treated all together in an ultra-pure water solution, removals were lower than when they were treated independently at the same individual concentrations (~250 µg/L) this may simply have been the result of a higher total contaminant concentration in solution, which lessened the availability of the •OH radical and incident UV irradiation for degradation of all compounds. On the other hand, removals were improved when the combined target compounds were present at a lower individual concentration range (~750 ng/L), which suggests that removals may be concentration driven, with reduced matrix effects seen at lower overall contaminant concentrations. Furthermore, during the partially-treated water experiments, variability in treatment performance was observed with differing water quality; however, it was not evident which specific quality parameters influenced treatment effectiveness. On the other hand, substantial and sometimes complete, degradation of the target compounds was still seen in the partially-treated water with high MP-UV/H₂O₂ doses (e.g. 300 mJ/cm² + 10 mg/L H₂O₂ and 500 + 10 mg/L H₂O₂). For the kinetic experiments, compounds were spiked individually in ultra-pure water (c~250 µg/L = ~1µM). The photolysis of the target compounds during treatment was assumed to be a pseudo-first-order reaction. Kinetic parameters were determined for both direct and indirect photolysis for both lamps. The calculated rate constants confirmed the importance of •OH radicals for degradation of these compounds, especially for ibuprofen and gemfibrozil. For ibuprofen and gemfibrozil, direct photolysis rate constants could not be determined for LP-UV because very little degradation was seen at the fluences tested. LP-UV direct phototlysis rate constants for naproxen and triclosan were 0.0002 and 0.0033 cm²/mJ, respectively. Overall rate constants describing degradation of the four compounds due to LP-UV/H₂O₂ ranged from 0.0049 to 0.0124 cm²/mJ. All four compounds had fluence-based reaction rate constants for MP-UV indirect photolysis of approximately 0.01 cm²/mJ, while MP-UV direct photolysis rate constants ranged between 0.0007-0.007 cm²/mJ, with ibuprofen having the lowest and triclosan the highest. The overall trends were similar to those seen by other researchers for the removal of taste and odour compounds. For example, fluences required for substantial removal were much higher than typical disinfection doses, the MP lamp was more effective than the LP lamp (when compared solely on a fluence-basis), and the addition of H₂O₂ improved removals. On the whole, UV/H₂O₂ appears to be a very promising technology for the removal of these selected PPCPs during drinking water treatment, and is likely to be equally effective for other, similar contaminants.

A bench-scale study of the degradation of four selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) was carried out using UV and UV/H₂O₂ treatment employing low pressure (LP) and medium pressure (MP) lamps. The target substances included the pharmaceutical compounds ibuprofen, naproxen, and gemfibrozil, along with the bactericide triclosan. There were four main objectives of the study, as follows: to evaluate the removal of the target compounds using UV irradiation alone and UV/H₂O₂, to determine the reaction kinetics for direct and indirect photolysis of each selected compound, to determine the influence of major water quality parameters on the efficacy of treatment, and to compare the applied UV and UV/H₂O₂ doses to those that have been found to be effective for disinfection and removal of taste and odour compounds, respectively. For initial ultra-pure water experiments the target compounds were spiked at concentrations of approximately 250 µg/L (~1 µM). In latter ultra-pure water experiments and in the partially-treated water experiments, the selected PPCPs were spiked at a lower range (c~500-1000 ng/L), which is more representative of reported environmental concentrations. In an ultra-pure water matrix, a high LP fluence of 1000 mJ/cm² caused only triclosan to substantially degrade. Furthermore, with LP-UV/H₂O₂ only triclosan and naproxen had average percent removals above 60% at a typical disinfection fluence of 40 mJ/cm² with 100 mg/L H₂O₂. Complete degradation of all four compounds in ultra-pure water was achieved with very high fluences (compared to those used for UV disinfection) with MP-UV alone (at or above 1000 mJ/cm²) or with relatively high fluences for MP-UV/H₂O₂ (200-300 mJ/cm²) with 10 mg/L H₂O₂. Overall, when compared at similar applied fluences, the MP lamp was much more effective than the LP lamp. Furthermore, the addition of H₂O₂ typically increased removal rates, in some cases substantially, through formation and subsequent reaction of the PPCP with the •OH radical. When target substances were treated all together in an ultra-pure water solution, removals were lower than when they were treated independently at the same individual concentrations (~250 µg/L) this may simply have been the result of a higher total contaminant concentration in solution, which lessened the availability of the •OH radical and incident UV irradiation for degradation of all compounds. On the other hand, removals were improved when the combined target compounds were present at a lower individual concentration range (~750 ng/L), which suggests that removals may be concentration driven, with reduced matrix effects seen at lower overall contaminant concentrations. Furthermore, during the partially-treated water experiments, variability in treatment performance was observed with differing water quality; however, it was not evident which specific quality parameters influenced treatment effectiveness. On the other hand, substantial and sometimes complete, degradation of the target compounds was still seen in the partially-treated water with high MP-UV/H₂O₂ doses (e.g. 300 mJ/cm² + 10 mg/L H₂O₂ and 500 + 10 mg/L H₂O₂). For the kinetic experiments, compounds were spiked individually in ultra-pure water (c~250 µg/L = ~1µM). The photolysis of the target compounds during treatment was assumed to be a pseudo-first-order reaction. Kinetic parameters were determined for both direct and indirect photolysis for both lamps. The calculated rate constants confirmed the importance of •OH radicals for degradation of these compounds, especially for ibuprofen and gemfibrozil. For ibuprofen and gemfibrozil, direct photolysis rate constants could not be determined for LP-UV because very little degradation was seen at the fluences tested. LP-UV direct phototlysis rate constants for naproxen and triclosan were 0.0002 and 0.0033 cm²/mJ, respectively. Overall rate constants describing degradation of the four compounds due to LP-UV/H₂O₂ ranged from 0.0049 to 0.0124 cm²/mJ. All four compounds had fluence-based reaction rate constants for MP-UV indirect photolysis of approximately 0.01 cm²/mJ, while MP-UV direct photolysis rate constants ranged between 0.0007-0.007 cm²/mJ, with ibuprofen having the lowest and triclosan the highest. The overall trends were similar to those seen by other researchers for the removal of taste and odour compounds. For example, fluences required for substantial removal were much higher than typical disinfection doses, the MP lamp was more effective than the LP lamp (when compared solely on a fluence-basis), and the addition of H₂O₂ improved removals. On the whole, UV/H₂O₂ appears to be a very promising technology for the removal of these selected PPCPs during drinking water treatment, and is likely to be equally effective for other, similar contaminants.

A series of pilot-scale granular media filtration experiments was conducted to examine the effect of media roughness on filter performance and to evaluate the applicability of spherical, rough engineered ceramic filter media for use in granular media filters used for drinking water treatment. Filter media performance was assessed using turbidity and particle count reductions, Cryptosporidium oocyst and oocyst-sized microsphere removal, head loss and stability of operation. Experiments were designed to allow related facets of current filtration research to be examined. These included: effect of loading rate, coagulant type and dosage, and suitability of latex microspheres as surrogates for Cryptosporidium oocyst removal by granular media filtration. This study indicated that increased filter media roughness consistently improved turbidity and particle count reduction under the conditions investigated. As well, the engineered media also consistently achieved greater stability of operation during non-ideal operational periods (e.g. sudden change in filter influent turbidity).Oocyst removals were generally improved by media roughness, though this improvement was reliant on operating conditions, such as coagulant dose and type of coagulant used. The surrogate relationship between oocyst-sized latex microspheres and oocyst removal by filtration was also dependent on coagulant dose and type of coagulant. During trials with no coagulant addition, contrasts in oocyst removal were not significant, suggesting that neither surface roughness nor the size of media used were significant factors impacting oocyst removal by filtration during those periods of impaired operation. When pre-treating raw water with PACl, the engineered ceramic media achieved up to 1.25 log10 higher oocyst removals than conventional media. This improvement in oocyst removal relative to conventional media was not observed when alum was used as the primary coagulant, however. Future studies should directly compare engineered and conventional media filtration performance, using other raw water sources and different operating conditions. Biologically active filtration should also be included in future performance studies because the rough, highly porous surface of the engineered ceramic media is likely to provide excellent biofilm support.

The use of sunlight for water disinfection has been practiced since ancient times. Only in the last three decades has solar disinfection become widely recognized as a viable means of providing safe drinking water to the disadvantaged portion of the world’s population. The World Health Organization estimates that 1.6 million people die every year because of waterborne diseases. <br/><br/> The Swiss Federal Institute of Environmental Science and Technology and their Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries have been instrumental in propagating the solar water disinfection (SODIS) process in developing countries. The reason for this technology being widely used and accepted is its ease of use and effectiveness: water is placed in clear plastic bottles and exposed to direct sunlight for approximately six hours. The microorganisms in the water absorb the sunlight and it, in turn at sufficient UV dosages, causes mutations to their genetic material, inhibiting reproduction. Although some pathogens may still be viable they are no longer infective. The result is microbiologically safe water. <br/><br/> Research to date has explored everything from which colour and size the SODIS containers should be to whether adding catalysts to the water before exposure improves disinfection. Apart from a few studies that examined the effect of shaking the bottles (to entrain air) before exposure, there has been limited research on pretreatments for enhancing solar disinfection. <br/><br/> The focus of this project was to explore two pretreatments for SODIS and determine how they affect the efficiency of the process. The first stage was to examine one of the currently used pretreatments: cleaning the water containers before use. The second stage was to develop an accessible, low-cost filtration technique to remove particles from the water before exposure to sunlight. Particles in the water disperse the light and protect the microorganisms from being inactivated, so it is important to have as few particles as possible; the recommended upper limit is 30 NTU for solar disinfection. In many instances, surface water with high turbidity (greater than 200 NTU) serves as the only source for drinking water in developing areas. <br/><br/> The first series of experiments in the current research evaluated if cleaning the bottles was necessary and if so, which cleaning agents would be most effective and available. The agents selected were 70% isopropyl alcohol, a soap-water mixture, and lime juice. The experiments demonstrated that cleaning with 70% isopropyl alcohol did not affect the process in any way. Cleaning with the soap-water mixture did have a slightly negative effect on the process; there was substantial microbial recovery when bottles were kept in the dark overnight. In the case of the lime juice, it actually inhibited the disinfection process. It is necessary to remove any debris that might exist within the containers before using them, but using a chemical cleaning agent or mechanically scrubbing can decrease the amount of disinfection that occurs during SODIS. Thus, it is suggested that using a chemical pretreatment is not necessary and has the potential to inhibit disinfection, especially without proper training or technical knowledge. <br/><br/> The second series of experiments identified the optimal design for a low-cost roughing filter that could be used to remove particles from water before exposure to sunlight. The roughing filter that was built from the same plastic pop bottles used for solar disinfection, as well as gravel and sand. It was constructed with three centimetres of gravel on the bottom of the pop bottle and then 17 cm of coarse sand was added on top to make the total filter height 20 cm. A 0.6 mm hole was made at approximately 1.5 cm from the bottom of the bottle using a standard sewing needle. Each filter run consisted of 10 L of water at approximately 200 NTU. Experimental results indicated that 95% removal of turbidity could be achieved. These roughing filters can be constructed from readily available and affordable materials in developing countries and produce an effluent water quality of less than 30 NTU when initial turbidities are greater than 200 NTU. <br/><br/> Finally, the third series of experiments focused on testing the newly developed roughing filter in series with SODIS to evaluate the system as a whole. The results confirmed that using the roughing filter, as a pretreatment to SODIS, is a highly effective means of improving the disinfection potential of the process. These roughing filters produce an effluent water quality of less than 30 NTU, which is required for SODIS, making them a viable pretreatment for turbid water intended for SODIS use.

The drinking water contamination tragedy in Walkerton, Ontario during the spring of 2000 led to many changes in water management for the province. Among these changes has been the increased use of the multiple barrier approach (MBA) to safe drinking water as the basis of water management for communities throughout Ontario. The MBA is also used in the management of water for First Nations communities throughout Ontario and Canada. Literature on water quality management for First Nations suggests that despite these changes, many communities continue to face challenges for ensuring the safety and quality of their drinking water supplies. Fort William First Nation, Gull Bay First Nation, and Mattagami First Nation, were selected for this study in order to investigate the use of the MBA in these communities. Data was collected using key informant interviews with representatives of institutions that affect water management for the case study communities, direct observations during visits to two of the communities and attendance at a First Nations water policy forum, and through a review of recent reports and publications on safe drinking water for First Nations. The research has provided insight into the challenges that the case study communities face for ensuring safe drinking water under the MBA, as well as opportunities that exist to address those challenges. The findings suggest that the MBA currently does not meet the unique needs of some First Nations communities. They also suggest that specific adaptations of existing water management strategies to the MBA framework may lead to a more effective approach to ensure safe drinking water for First Nations communities. This thesis focuses on several key ways to make these changes: Strengthen public involvement and awareness; Introduce effective legislative and policy frameworks; Encourage research, science and technology for First Nations’ water management; Allocate sufficient financial resources to First Nations to recruit, train and retain qualified water managers and maintain drinking water infrastructure, and; Increase efforts to ensure that water management goals are supported by local and indigenous traditional knowledge, beliefs and perspectives.

Several health problems may be caused by excess nitrate in drinking water, the most important of which being methemoglobinemia, a potentially fatal disorder, in infants under six months of age. Many different parts of the world have been facing the problem of nitrate contaminated surface and groundwaters due in large part to excessive use of nitrate-based chemical fertilizers. In the Region of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada some groundwater sources have nitrate concentrations approaching the Health Canada and Ontario Ministry of the Environment maximum acceptable concentration (MAC) of 10 mg NO3--N/L. Finding a practical and economical way to reduce nitrate concentrations in representative groundwater in the Region of Waterloo was the overall objective of this research. To achieve this goal, nitrate removal technologies including biological denitrification, ion exchange (IX), reverse osmosis (RO), electrodialysis (ED), and chemical denitrification were reviewed and compared. IX and RO were found to be the most promising technologies for nitrate removal. They have also been approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) as Best Available Technologies (BAT). To investigate the feasibility of IX and RO for nitrate removal from representative groundwater in the Region of Waterloo, bench-scale experiments were conducted and compared. These technologies could be considered for application at full- or point-of-use (POU)-scale. Decision support assistance for the selection of the appropriate technology for different technical and economical conditions is provided as an outcome of this work. Two nitrate-selective ion exchange resins (Dowex™ NSR-1 and Purolite® A-520E), two non-selective resins (Purolite® A-300E and Amberlite® IRA400 Cl), and a commercially-available RO POU device (Culligan® Aqua-Cleer® model RO30), which included a particle filter and a carbon block, were tested with deionized water and real groundwater.* IX results confirmed that production time before resin exhaustion was influenced by operating conditions, specifically bed depth as would be expected. It was also confirmed that the presence of competing anions (sulfate, chloride) and alkalinity adversely affected performance, with sulfate being the main competitor for nitrate removal. The extent of these effects was quantified for the conditions tested. At the end of the runs, the non-selective resins were prone to potential nitrate displacement and release into product water and are therefore not recommended. The nitrate-selective resins did not release previously adsorbed nitrate as their capacity became exhausted. Purolite® A-520E was identified as the best alternative amongst the four resins for removing nitrate from the representative groundwater source. The RO unit removed roughly 80% of the nitrate from groundwater. Background ions didn’t appear to compete with each other for removal by RO units, so RO might be a more appropriate technology than IX for nitrate removal from waters with high concentrations of sulfate or TDS. Since RO removes other background ions as well as nitrate, the product water of RO is low in alkalinity and can potentially be corrosive, if water from a small full-scale system is pumped through a communal distribution system. Post-treatment including pH adjustment, addition of caustic soda, and/or corrosion inhibitors may be required. While the carbon block did not play a substantial role with respect to removal of nitrate in the groundwater tested, a potential issue was identified when running RO systems without the carbon block. In deionized water (and presumably in very low alkalinity real waters) it was noted that RO nitrate removal efficiency dropped substantially as the alkalinity of the influent water approached zero. With respect to the scale of application of IX and RO devices, IX can be applied at full-scale without requiring large amounts of space. However, if feed water contains high concentrations of sulfate or TDS, nitrate leakage happens sooner and regeneration would be needed at more frequent intervals. Also, chloride concentrations in IX product water might exceed aesthetic objectives (AO) and should be monitored in cases of high feed water TDS. POU IX devices are not recommended when feed water nitrate concentration is high due to potential nitrate leakage into the product water when the resin is nearing exhaustion which increases public health risk. Issues associated with RO application at full-scale are high energy demand, low recovery, high costs, need of pre-treatment (fouling control), and post-treatment (corrosion control). On the other hand, POU RO devices may be acceptable since low recovery is of less importance in a household system, and product water corrosivity is less relevant. POU RO devices are preferable to POU IX units due to their lower risk of nitrate leakage into treated water. * Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

The natural occurrences of high (&gt;10 μg/L) dissolved arsenic (As) in groundwater of Bengal Basin has put millions of people under the threat of chronic As exposure through drinking water. Present study has examined the processes that regulate As mobilization and its distribution in shallow aquifers and the potentiality of finding safe aquifers within shallow depth (&lt;50 m) for drinking water supply. The results indicate that in terms of aquifer sediment colors and water quality two types of aquifer namely brown sand aquifer (BSA) and grey sand aquifer (GSA) can be distinguished within the depth, accessible by low-cost drilling. The redox condition in the BSA is delineated to be Mn oxyhydroxides reducing, not sufficiently lowered for As mobilization resulting in high Mn and low Fe and As in groundwater. While in GSA, currently the reductive dissolution of Fe oxyhydroxides is the prevailing redox process causing As mobilization into groundwater of this aquifer type. It is revealed that the vertical distribution of As and other aqueous redox parameters is related to the redox zonation within aquifer. The decoupling of As and Fe release into groundwater is evident in the shallowest part of aquifer because of Fe enrichment by weathering of silicate minerals especially of biotite, the precipitation of secondary mineral phases like siderite and vivianite and incomplete reduction of Fe oxyhydroxides. It is characterized that the seasonal variations of As and other aqueous solutes are limited within the upper portion of aquifer only (&lt;30 m bgl) and can be related to seasonal cycling of redox status, aggregation and dispersion of As scavenging colloids, local groundwater abstraction and monsoonal recharge. The results of surface complexation modeling indicate that PO43- is the major competitor of As(III) and As(V) adsorption onto Fe oxyhydroxides. This study concludes that the reductive dissolution of Fe oxyhydroxides followed by competitive sorption reactions with the aquifer sediment is the process conducive for As enrichment in groundwater of Bengal Basin. Present study advocates that despite low concentration of As in groundwater, a rigorous assessment of attendant health risk for Mn is necessary prior to considering mass scale exploitation of the BSA for sustainable drinking water supply. This study also validates that TW platform colors can be used as a rapid screening tool for As and Mn in drinking water wells to prioritize As mitigation management. / <p>QC 20130919</p> / EURINDIA 2009-1665

Syftet med examensarbetet var att undersöka effekterna av ozonering och filtrering på råvattnet från sjön Mälaren. Studien är utförd i en pilotanläggning på Lovö vattenverk, Stockholm Vatten AB, under våren 2004. En negativ effekt med den konventionella reningen är den stora konsumtionen av kemiska koagulanter. Kemikalieanvändningen leder till många transporter och processen producerar också ett slam som för närvarande transporteras till Mälaren. År 2001 byggdes en pilotanläggning på Lovö vattenverk för utveckling av nya processer, en av processerna är ozonering följt av olika filter. Ozonering har använts i Europa i många år som desinfektion i slutet av dricksvattenreningsprocessen. Intresset för ozonering har ökat markant sista åren och idag används ozonet också i andra steg i processen. Förutom desinfektion har ozonet andra fördelar, som oxidation av järn och magnesium, mikroflockning, reduktion av lukt och smak samt är bra på att reducera färgen på vattnet. Mikroflockningen leder till att kemikalieanvändningen kan minska och i vissa fall tas bort helt. Den här studien startade med en litteraturundersökning följd av försök med ozonering och filtrering i pilotanläggningen. De första undersökningarna sammanfattades med att ozonering följt av filtrering inte gav tillräckligt bra resultat och processen behöver ett komplement för att producera ett högklassigt vatten. Undersökningen fortsatte med laboratorieanalyser för att undersöka effekterna av olika kemiska koagulanter. Resultatet visade att järnsulfat tillsammans med kalcium var ett bra alternativ och en lägre kemikaliedos kunde användas. Efter implementering av kalcium och järnsulfat till pilotanläggningen testades olika ozondoser och olika järnsulfatdoser. Det bästa resultatet erhölls då man använde sig av en ozondos på 6 mg O3/l och en järnsulfatdos på 50-60 μmol/l. Denna mängd av järnsulfat är ca 60 % lägre än den dos som används vid den konventionella reningen på Lovö vattenverk. Olika filter används i pilotanläggningen och för att förbättra resultatet provades även ett Filtralite-filter som biofilter istället för GAC-filtret. Jämförelsen mellan Filtralite-filter och GAC-filter visade på stora skillnader i parametervärden i början av studietiden. När bakteriepopulationen ökade i Filtralite-filtret blev skillnaderna mindre och i slutet av undersökningstiden var parametervärdena likartade. Det slutliga resultatet indikerar att Filtralite-filter kan vara ett bra alternativ som biofilter. / This Master thesis was made to investigate the effects of ozonation and filtration on raw water from Lake Mälaren. The study was performed in lab-scale as well as in a pilot plant at Lovö waterworks, Stockholm Water Company during spring 2004. The conventional treatment at Lovö waterworks comes with a few disadvantages, such as large consumption of chemical coagulants. The chemical consumption leads to many transports and the treatment also produces a sludge which is, in present, returned to Lake Mälaren. In 2001 a pilot plant were built at Lovö waterworks for research on new treatment processes, and ozonation followed by filtration is one of them. Ozonation has been used in Europe for several years as disinfection at the end of the drinking water treatment process. The interests of ozonation has increased significantly in recent years and today the ozonation is used in other steps in the drinking water treatment process. Except for the disinfection, ozone has other benefits such as oxidation of iron and manganese, microflocculation, reduction of taste and odour and it is also effective to reduce the water colour. The microflocculation leads to the fact that less or no coagulants need to be used in the process. This study started with a literature overview followed by experiments on ozonation and filtration in the pilot plant. After the first experiments the conclusions were that the ozonation and filtration did not reach the same results as Lovö waterworks. To continue, jar tests were made to see the effects of different coagulants. The result indicated that ferric sulphate together with calcium addition (pH-adjustment) was a good alternative. Thereby a lower coagulant dose could be used. When ferric sulphate and calcium were implemented into the pilot plant, different ozone doses and ferric sulphate doses were tested. The best results occurred when an ozone dose of 6 mg O3/l and a ferric sulphate dose of 50-60 μmol/l were used. This amount of ferric sulphate is approximately 60 % lower than that for the conventional treatment at Lovö waterworks. To produce ozone electrons are needed and energy consumption increases with approximately 66 % compared to the conventional treatment. The decrease in chemical dose and increase in energy demand gives a decrease of the total cost with 10 % compared to the conventional treatment. The results indicate that the treatment with ozonation, calcium addition and ferric sulphate as a coagulant is an alternative to the conventional treatment. Different filters were used in the pilot plant and to improve the results a Filtralite-filter was tested instead of the GAC-filter as a bio filter. When comparing Filtralite-filter with the GAC-filter there were large differences between the filters at the beginning of the study. When the bacteria population in the Filtralite-filter had started to increase the differences became less. In the end of the experimental period the filters had similar conditions and Filtralite-filter may be a good alternative as a biofilter.

A bench-scale study of the degradation of four selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) was carried out using UV and UV/H₂O₂ treatment employing low pressure (LP) and medium pressure (MP) lamps. The target substances included the pharmaceutical compounds ibuprofen, naproxen, and gemfibrozil, along with the bactericide triclosan. There were four main objectives of the study, as follows: to evaluate the removal of the target compounds using UV irradiation alone and UV/H₂O₂, to determine the reaction kinetics for direct and indirect photolysis of each selected compound, to determine the influence of major water quality parameters on the efficacy of treatment, and to compare the applied UV and UV/H₂O₂ doses to those that have been found to be effective for disinfection and removal of taste and odour compounds, respectively. For initial ultra-pure water experiments the target compounds were spiked at concentrations of approximately 250 µg/L (~1 µM). In latter ultra-pure water experiments and in the partially-treated water experiments, the selected PPCPs were spiked at a lower range (c~500-1000 ng/L), which is more representative of reported environmental concentrations. In an ultra-pure water matrix, a high LP fluence of 1000 mJ/cm² caused only triclosan to substantially degrade. Furthermore, with LP-UV/H₂O₂ only triclosan and naproxen had average percent removals above 60% at a typical disinfection fluence of 40 mJ/cm² with 100 mg/L H₂O₂. Complete degradation of all four compounds in ultra-pure water was achieved with very high fluences (compared to those used for UV disinfection) with MP-UV alone (at or above 1000 mJ/cm²) or with relatively high fluences for MP-UV/H₂O₂ (200-300 mJ/cm²) with 10 mg/L H₂O₂. Overall, when compared at similar applied fluences, the MP lamp was much more effective than the LP lamp. Furthermore, the addition of H₂O₂ typically increased removal rates, in some cases substantially, through formation and subsequent reaction of the PPCP with the •OH radical. When target substances were treated all together in an ultra-pure water solution, removals were lower than when they were treated independently at the same individual concentrations (~250 µg/L) this may simply have been the result of a higher total contaminant concentration in solution, which lessened the availability of the •OH radical and incident UV irradiation for degradation of all compounds. On the other hand, removals were improved when the combined target compounds were present at a lower individual concentration range (~750 ng/L), which suggests that removals may be concentration driven, with reduced matrix effects seen at lower overall contaminant concentrations. Furthermore, during the partially-treated water experiments, variability in treatment performance was observed with differing water quality; however, it was not evident which specific quality parameters influenced treatment effectiveness. On the other hand, substantial and sometimes complete, degradation of the target compounds was still seen in the partially-treated water with high MP-UV/H₂O₂ doses (e.g. 300 mJ/cm² + 10 mg/L H₂O₂ and 500 + 10 mg/L H₂O₂). For the kinetic experiments, compounds were spiked individually in ultra-pure water (c~250 µg/L = ~1µM). The photolysis of the target compounds during treatment was assumed to be a pseudo-first-order reaction. Kinetic parameters were determined for both direct and indirect photolysis for both lamps. The calculated rate constants confirmed the importance of •OH radicals for degradation of these compounds, especially for ibuprofen and gemfibrozil. For ibuprofen and gemfibrozil, direct photolysis rate constants could not be determined for LP-UV because very little degradation was seen at the fluences tested. LP-UV direct phototlysis rate constants for naproxen and triclosan were 0.0002 and 0.0033 cm²/mJ, respectively. Overall rate constants describing degradation of the four compounds due to LP-UV/H₂O₂ ranged from 0.0049 to 0.0124 cm²/mJ. All four compounds had fluence-based reaction rate constants for MP-UV indirect photolysis of approximately 0.01 cm²/mJ, while MP-UV direct photolysis rate constants ranged between 0.0007-0.007 cm²/mJ, with ibuprofen having the lowest and triclosan the highest. The overall trends were similar to those seen by other researchers for the removal of taste and odour compounds. For example, fluences required for substantial removal were much higher than typical disinfection doses, the MP lamp was more effective than the LP lamp (when compared solely on a fluence-basis), and the addition of H₂O₂ improved removals. On the whole, UV/H₂O₂ appears to be a very promising technology for the removal of these selected PPCPs during drinking water treatment, and is likely to be equally effective for other, similar contaminants.