Fatigue and drowsy driving in the state of Utah has been a causal factor in thousands of crashes over the years and poses a serious threat to public safety. Consequently, the purpose of this research was to evaluate the impact of drowsy driving in the state, to identify locations where fatigue and drowsy driving may be contributing factors to current crashes, and to identify methods to help mitigate these crashes. A 3-year drowsy driving crash rate spanning the years 2002 – 2004 was used to determine which segments of Utah highway are most prone to drowsy driving crashes. Drowsy driving corridors were located on Interstates 15, 70, 80, and 84 as well as United States Routes 89 and 91. Furthermore, State Route 36 also had two drowsy driving corridors. In order to recommend appropriate drowsy driving countermeasures for the drowsy driving corridors, a review of the existing countermeasures was conducted. The existing countermeasures included cable median barrier, rumble strips, rest areas, and drowsy driving freeway signage. The freeway signage is used to alert drivers of the adverse effects of drowsy driving and was the basis for a before-after study as well as a public survey of drowsy driving along Interstate 80 west of Salt Lake City. The before-after study of the drowsy driving freeway signage concluded that the freeway signage has played a part in reducing the number of crashes by as much as 63 percent in the eastbound direction and by as much as 22 percent in the westbound direction. As indicated, a public survey was conducted at two rest areas to supplement the findings of the before-after analysis. Using the 405 completed surveys, 14 Chi-Square tests were conducted with five of the test yielding statistically significant results. Finally, recommendations were made for the 41 drowsy driving corridors resulting from the 3-year crash rate analysis. Drowsy driving countermeasures recommended include: additional shoulder and centerline rumble strips, cable median barrier, guardrail replacement, and drowsy driving highway signage. Drowsy driving countermeasures not yet implemented but which should be considered by the Utah Department of Transportation are transverse rumble strips, wider longitudinal pavement markings, in-lane pavement markings indicating “AVOID FATIGUE DRIVING,” minimizing edge drop off, flattening slopes in clear zones, and adding a modified rest area.

There is a substantial amount of evidence that suggests that driver drowsiness plays a significant role in road accidents. Alarming recent statistics are raising the interest in equipping vehicles with driver drowsiness detection systems. This dissertation describes the design and implementation of a driver drowsiness detection system that is based on the analysis of visual input consisting of the driver's face and eyes. The resulting system combines off-the-shelf software components for face detection, human skin color detection and eye state classification in a novel way. It follows a behavioral methodology by performing a non-invasive monitoring of external cues describing a driver's level of drowsiness. We look at this complex problem from a systems engineering point of view in order to go from a proof-of-concept prototype to a stable software framework. Our system utilizes two detection and analysis methods: (i) face detection with eye region extrapolation and (ii) eye state classification. Additionally, we use two confirmation processes - one based on custom skin color detection, the other based on nod detection - to make the system more robust and resilient while not sacrificing speed significantly. The system was designed to be dynamic and adaptable to conform to the current conditions and hardware capabilities. / Includes bibliography. / Dissertation (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2014. / FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection

This study was conducted in an attempt to improve drowsiness detection in automobiles by examining velocity-related measures. These measures were also included in multiple regression-generated drowsiness detection algorithms to determine their contribution to detection accuracy. In addition, the effects of cruise control and an auditory secondary task on the level of drowsiness and driving performance were examined. Twelve volunteers from the Blacksburg, Virginia area were used as subjects. In the early morning hours after sleep deprivation, subjects drove a moving base automobile simulator, during which time physiological and performance measures were gathered. Data analysis revealed that velocity-related measures can be good indicators of drowsiness when subjects are without external stimulation, but otherwise, these measures are fairly weak indicators of drowsiness. Similarly, the addition of velocity-related measures to drowsiness detection algorithms proved to be quite modest. Finally, there was no significant main effect of either cruise control or secondary task on drowsiness or driving performance. / M.S.

This study was undertaken to determine which variables and combination of variables could be used for the prediction of on-the-road drowsiness. Numerous driver-vehicle performance measures and secondary task performance measures were collected so that the predictability of several definitional measures of drowsiness could be tested. Twelve volunteer subjects were employed in the algorithm development phase of this study. All subjects were from the driver population in the Blacksburg, Virginia area. The participants were sleep deprived and drove a moving base simulator late at night in order to increase the likelihood that they would experience drowsiness while driving. After completion of data collection, numerous algorithms were developed using multiple regression and discriminant analysis methods. Another twelve volunteer subjects were subsequently employed in the algorithm validation phase of this study. Similar physiological and driving performance measures were collected during both phases of the study. All subjects were from the same driver population. All subjects were run under similar conditions as those in the algorithm development phase. Algorithms that appeared promising which were developed in the first phase of study were validated by applying them to the new data in an attempt to predict drowsiness on a new subject pool. It was found that drowsiness could be detected on a new subject pool and that the rate of correct predictions was quite high. There was no general decrease in predictive power of the drowsiness detection algorithms when applied to new data. Results showed that an accuracy rate of over 90 percent could be accomplished when output from the detection algorithms were classified into categories of "Awake," "Questionable," and "Drowsy." / Ph. D.

Thesis (M.S.)--Linköping University, 2004. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 63-64). Also available online via the VTI web site (www.vti.se).

Abgelenktes Fahren gehört zu den Hauptursachen von Verkehrsunfällen und kann auf visuelle, manuelle oder kognitive Ablenkungsquellen zurückgeführt werden. Jede dieser Ablenkungsquellen wurde bereits mit negativen Effekten auf die Fahrerleistung in Zusammenhang gebracht. Obschon ein weitgehender Konsens über negative Auswirkungen von visueller/visuell-manueller Ablenkung besteht, sind die Wirkungen kognitiver Ablenkung auf Fahrfehler und Unfälle noch immer umstritten. Viele experimentelle Studien haben negative Auswirkungen kognitiver Ablenkung auf die Fahrerleistung berichtet. Demgegenüber stehen jedoch die Ergebnisse der Mehrzahl vorliegender „naturalistic driving studies“, die kein erhöhtes Unfallrisiko oder sogar protektive Effekte in diesem Zusammenhang fanden. Die aktuelle Entwicklung hin zu Mensch-Fahrzeug-Schnittstellen, die die Bedienung diverser Anwendungen mittels Sprachsteuerung ermöglichen, führt zu einem Anstieg von kognitiver Beanspruchung beim Fahren. Es ist daher von entscheidender Bedeutung, die Auswirkungen kognitiver Ablenkung auf die Fahrerleistung zu erfassen, um den Verantwortungsträgern in der Gesellschaft, den Regierungen und der Industrie eine Risikoabschätzung dieser Funktionen zu ermöglichen und die Sicherheit von Mensch-Fahrzeug-Schnittstellen zu erhöhen. Das Hauptziel dieser Dissertation bestand darin, die Effekte von kognitiver Ablenkung auf die Fahrerleistung zu untersuchen. Verschiedene Arten kognitiver Ablenkung, die sich beim Fahren unter realen Bedingungen häufig auf die Fahrer auswirken, wurden in dieser Arbeit kodiert und analysiert: kognitiv ablenkende Nebenaufgaben (z.B. telefonieren, singen), Fahreremotionen (z.B. Freude, Wut/Frustration, Traurigkeit) und Kombinationen von Fahreremotionen und Nebenaufgaben (z.B. Streit mit dem Beifahrer oder am Telefon). Bei der Untersuchung von Effekten kognitiver Ablenkung auf das Fahren sind Umwelt-, Situations- und Personenfaktoren zu berücksichtigen, da sie Mediator- und Moderatorvariablen bei der Erfassung des relativen Risikos von Ablenkung beim Fahren im Straßenverkehr darstellen. Daher folgte diese Dissertation dem ganzheitlichen Ansatz, so viele relevante Variablen wie möglich zu betrachten, die mit der Ausführung kognitiv ablenkender Tätigkeiten interagieren. Zu diesem Zweck wurden Daten der derzeit umfangreichsten „naturalistic driving study“ (the second Strategic Highway Research Program, SHRP 2) kodiert und analysiert, um möglichst viele Situationen, in denen eine kognitive Beanspruchung die Fahrerleistung potenziell beeinflusste, umfassend zu bewerten. Gleichzeitig wurde eine große Zahl von Mediator- und Moderatorvariablen betrachtet, die beim Fahren im realen Straßenverkehr auftreten (z.B. Einfluss von Kreuzungen, Wetter, etc.). Dieser Ansatz sollte das Verständnis und die externe Validität der Ergebnisse erhöhen und stellt einen wichtigen Schritt hin zu einem vollständigen Modell jener Variablen dar, die entweder zu unangemessen Verhaltensweisen und Unfällen beitragen oder sie reduzieren. Im Rahmen der Dissertation wurden vier Studien durchgeführt, die auf der Grundlage von zwei SHRP 2 Datensätzen die Zusammenhänge zwischen kognitiven und anderen Ablenkungsquellen, Umwelt-, Situations- und Personenfaktoren und Fahrerleistung untersuchten. Weiterhin wurden Kausalfaktoren in 315 vom Fahrer verursachten Unfällen und Beinaheunfällen, die mit Fahrerablenkung, Fahrerbeeinträchtigung oder keinem dieser Faktoren assoziiert waren, analysiert. Die erste Studie untersuchte die Auswirkungen von Wut beim Fahren und Streit mit dem Beifahrer oder jemandem am Telefon auf die Fahrerleistung. Wut beim Fahren ging mit einer Häufung aggressiver Verhaltensweisen einher, jedoch nicht mit einer Erhöhung von Fahrfehlern. Streitgespräche mit dem Beifahrer oder einer Person am Telefon (das heißt, wenn mutmaßlich das höchste Maß an kognitiver Ablenkung vorlag), schienen darüber hinaus mit keiner Form von unangemessenen Verhaltensweisen im Zusammenhang zu stehen. Die zweite Studie untersuchte, wie sich kognitive, visuelle und manuelle Fahrerablenkung, emotionale Beeinträchtigung sowie Umwelt-, Situations- und Persönlichkeitsfaktoren auf die Fahrerleistung auswirken. Ein Zusammenhang zwischen kognitiver Ablenkung und einer Verschlechterung der Fahrerleistung konnte nicht festgestellt werden. Die dritte Studie replizierte und erweiterte Ergebnisse der zweiten Untersuchung auf der Grundlage eines größeren Datensatzes, bestehend aus Fahrsegmenten, die Unfällen, Beinaheunfällen und Baselines vorausgingen und weder emotionale noch andere Fahrerbeeinträchtigungen enthielten. In Übereinstimmung mit den Ergebnissen der ersten und zweiten Studie, wurde keine Assoziation zwischen kognitiver Ablenkung und einer verschlechterten Fahrerleistung festgestellt. Bei der vierten Studie handelte es sich um eine vergleichende Analyse von Risikofaktoren für Unfälle/ Beinaheunfälle, die mit verschiedenen Arten von Ablenkung, Beeinträchtigung oder keinem von beiden, assoziiert waren. Unfälle, denen eine kognitive Ablenkung vorausgegangen war, waren vor allem mit von Ablenkung unabhängigen Fahrfehlern verbunden - genau wie die Unfälle, denen keine beobachtbare Nebentätigkeit vorausgegangen war. Dieses Ergebnis lässt vermuten, dass in früheren „naturalistic driving studies“, das Unfallrisiko von kognitiv ablenkenden Nebentätigkeiten eventuell sogar überschätzt wurde. Zusammenfassend legen die Ergebnisse die Schlussfolgerung nahe, dass kognitive Ablenkung durch beobachtbare emotionale Beeinträchtigung, (überwiegend) kognitiv ablenkende Nebenaufgaben oder die Kombination dieser beiden Faktoren, nicht mit sichtbaren negativen Auswirkungen auf die Fahrerleistung im tatsächlichen Straßenverkehr assoziiert werden kann. Im Gegensatz dazu hatten ablenkende Tätigkeiten, die zu Blickabwendungen von der Straße führen, und solche, die mit einem besonders hohen Unfallrisiko assoziiert werden, die größte Wahrscheinlichkeit Fahrfehler und Unfälle zu verursachen. / Driver distractions are among the leading causes of motor vehicle accidents. Such distractions can stem from competing visual, manual, or cognitive resources, all of which have been associated with detrimental effects on driving performance. Although the negative impacts of visual/visual-manual distraction are widely agreed upon, the effects of cognitive load on driving errors and crash risk are still debated. On the one hand, numerous experimental studies have shown adverse effects of cognitive distraction on driving performance. In contrast, most existing naturalistic driving studies have either not revealed increased crash/near-crash risk due to cognitive distraction, or have even reported a safety benefit. The number of in-vehicle tasks placing cognitive load on the driver is increasing in recent years due to the development of auditory human–machine interfaces such as voice control for several functions. This has enhanced the need to assess how cognitive distraction affects driving performance. These results are necessary to provide society, government, and industry with valid risk estimates, which will affect decision making regarding how to enhance the safety of using in-vehicle human-machine interfaces while driving. Therefore, the main objective of this thesis was to investigate how cognitive distraction affects driving performance. Different types of cognitive distraction that commonly affect most drivers in naturalistic conditions were coded and analyzed in the present thesis, including: cognitively distracting secondary tasks (e.g., talking on the phone, singing), driver emotion (e.g., happiness, anger/frustration, sadness), and combinations of driver emotion and secondary task demand (e.g., arguing with a passenger or with someone on the phone). Environmental, situational, and individual factors cannot be ignored when investigating the effects of cognitive distraction on driving performance, as they are mediating and moderating variables for estimating distraction relative risk in naturalistic driving. Therefore, a holistic approach guided this thesis towards incorporating as many important variables as possible that interact with the engagement in cognitively distracting activities. Data from the largest naturalistic driving study ever conducted (the second Strategic Highway Research Program, SHRP 2) were coded and analyzed to comprehensively assess many situations in which cognitive load potentially affected driving performance. Further, the goal was to simultaneously consider many possible mediating and moderating variables existent in real-world traffic (such as intersection influences, weather, etc.). This approach should increase understanding and external validity of the results, as well as represent an important step towards building a complete model depicting variables that contribute to or mitigate aberrant driving behaviors and crash risk. Four different analyses focused on two SHRP 2 data subsets to assess the relationship between cognitive and other distraction sources, environmental, situational, and individual factors, as well as driving performance. In addition, contributing factors in 315 at-fault crash and near-crash events associated with driver distraction, driver impairment, or neither of the two were analyzed. The first study examined driving performance in relation to driving anger as well as arguing with a passenger or with someone on the phone. Results showed that driving anger was associated with more frequent aggressive driving behaviors without increasing driving error frequency. Furthermore, when a conflict arose with a passenger or with someone on the phone (i.e., when the level of cognitive distraction was expected to be highest), there did not appear to be a link to any type of aberrant driving behavior. The second study analyzed driving performance based on cognitive, visual, and manual driver distraction, emotional impairment, as well as environmental, situational, and individual factors. Cognitive distraction was not associated with any decline in driving performance. The purpose of the third analysis was to replicate and extend the second study’s effects based on a larger data sample of driving segments preceding crashes, near-crashes, and matched baselines, of drivers not exhibiting emotional or other impairment types. Corroborating the first and second study’s results, there was no association between cognitive distractions and impaired driving performance. Finally, the fourth study compared the risk factors of crashes/near-crashes associated with either different driver distraction types, impairment, or neither. Crashes preceded by cognitive distraction were mainly associated with driving errors unrelated to the secondary task demands, as were the crashes preceded by no observable secondary task. This finding suggests that previous studies analyzing naturalistic driving data may have even overestimated the crash risk of cognitively distracting secondary task engagement. In summary, this thesis provides compelling evidence that cognitive distraction, either through observable emotional impairment, (mainly) cognitively distracting secondary tasks, or the combination of both, has no apparent relation with poorer driving performance observable in real-world traffic. On the contrary, distracting activities requiring the driver’s gaze to move away from the forward roadway and those associated with a particularly high crash risk had the highest chances of causing driving errors and crashes.