Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-11-09T12:35:25Z No. of bitstreams: 1 FabyanoAlbertoStalschmidtPrestesDissertacao2017.pdf: 1400128 bytes, checksum: 09760223aaa6e27dd73ff4e19e8dc8e9 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-11-09T12:36:23Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 FabyanoAlbertoStalschmidtPrestesDissertacao2017.pdf: 1400128 bytes, checksum: 09760223aaa6e27dd73ff4e19e8dc8e9 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-09T12:36:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 FabyanoAlbertoStalschmidtPrestesDissertacao2017.pdf: 1400128 bytes, checksum: 09760223aaa6e27dd73ff4e19e8dc8e9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-11-26 / The discussion that unveils the aspects related to the access to justice is relevant, bearing in mind that a new look to the problems that blur this right is necessary, which must be bequeathed to all citizens. In the light of this conceptions the present work brought as general objective the analyzes of tools to make the judiciary management more efficient. To reach the stablished objective, a work that presented compatible scientific method as elected subject was developed, specially the deductive, to particular issues, from general concepts extracted of the bibliographical research, and the inductive to conclusion making. The data analyzed with the bibliographical research and the statistical data contemplate that the State obligation is not synthesized into a mere jurisdictional response, but yet, to the provision of an effective protection, that respects the guiding principle of all the Brazilian judicial system, which is the free access to justice, but also that serves the constitutional principle of a reasonable length process provided as individual right in the Federal Constitution. Therefore, it demonstrates that the ado in the provision of judicial protection, and the lack of structure of the Judiciary Branch constitute a contemporary problem, capable of generating lengthy process, inefficient and unfair, turning the access to justice a chimera that is not harbored by the celerity, but yet, by the lengthening process. Furthermore, the judicial services made available to the society, must be charged in a reasonable way to respond the aspirations of the user and be viable to the State bear the costs in a rational way. The whole limiting context to justice in Brazil is a triggering event in the delay of the conflict effective resolution, and contemplates the increase in costs of process, reducing the trust that the society has for the Judiciary Branch and in the protection of their rights. It was concluded that the reengineering of judiciary management is a crucial instrument to the improvement of judicial service rendering, specially, as incentive to all means of extrajudicial conflict arbitration. / A discuss??o que descortina os aspectos relacionados ao acesso ?? justi??a se faz pertinente, tendo em vista que ?? necess??rio um novo olhar para os problemas que enevoam este direito, que deve ser legado a todos os cidad??os. A luz destas concep????es o presente estudo trouxe como objetivo geral analisar ferramentas para tornar mais eficaz a gest??o judici??ria. Para o alcance do objetivo tra??ado foi desenvolvido um trabalho que apresentou m??todos cient??ficos compat??veis com o tema eleito, especialmente o dedutivo, para quest??es particulares, a partir de conceitos gerais separados da pesquisa bibliogr??fica, e o indutivo para a tomada de conclus??es. Os dados analisados com a pesquisa bibliogr??fica e dados estat??sticos contemplam que o dever do Estado n??o se resume a uma mera resposta jurisdicional, mas sim, a presta????o de uma tutela efetiva, que respeite o princ??pio norteador de todo o sistema judicial brasileiro, que ?? o livre acesso ?? justi??a, mas tamb??m que atenda ao princ??pio constitucional da razo??vel dura????o do processo previsto como direito individual na Constitui????o Federal. Isto posto, traz-se a lume que a demora na presta????o da tutela jurisdicional e a falta de estrutura do Poder Judici??rio constituem problemas da contemporaneidade, capazes de gerar um processo lento, ineficaz e injusto, tornando o acesso ?? justi??a uma quimera que n??o encontra guarida na celeridade e, sim na morosidade processual. Al??m disso, os servi??os de justi??a colocadas ?? disposi????o da sociedade, devem ser cobrados de forma razo??vel para atender aos anseios dos usu??rios e de forma racional para ser vi??vel para o Estado arcar com estas despesas. Todo o contexto limitador do acesso ?? justi??a no Brasil ?? fato gerador de demora na efetiva resolu????o da lide, e contempla o aumento do custo do processo, reduzindo a confian??a que a sociedade tem no Poder Judici??rio e na prote????o de seus direitos. Concluiu-se que a reengenharia da gest??o judici??ria ?? instrumento fundamental para a melhoria da presta????o dos servi??os de justi??a, especialmente, com o incentivo dos meios de concilia????o de conflitos extrajudiciais.

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-11-01T22:40:28Z No. of bitstreams: 1 WinstonDeAraujoTeixeira_DISSERT.pdf: 1204463 bytes, checksum: ce6f9db56353b5a238b14f5f7b448a3a (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-11-14T00:33:03Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 WinstonDeAraujoTeixeira_DISSERT.pdf: 1204463 bytes, checksum: ce6f9db56353b5a238b14f5f7b448a3a (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-14T00:33:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 WinstonDeAraujoTeixeira_DISSERT.pdf: 1204463 bytes, checksum: ce6f9db56353b5a238b14f5f7b448a3a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-09-06 / A presente disserta??o trata da dura??o razo?vel do processo, especificamente, na justi?a do trabalho. Nesse contexto, abordam-se as quest?es constitucionais referentes ? problematiza??o da dura??o razo?vel do processo, enquanto direito fundamental, bem como sua aplicabilidade na justi?a trabalhista. O estudo do tema escolhido ? importante porque traz a discuss?o acerca da ?demora? na presta??o jurisdicional, notadamente, ?quela que assegura os direitos fundamentais dos trabalhadores, proporcionando a an?lise das causas e consequ?ncias do tempo do processo. O presente trabalho tem por objetivo desenvolver uma abordagem constitucional da dura??o razo?vel do processo na justi?a do trabalho, considerando o tempo razo?vel do processo no ordenamento jur?dico brasileiro como um direito fundamental. Levantando a problem?tica dos efeitos do tempo na atividade jurisdicional e o crescente fen?meno da sumariza??o da cogni??o processual, em que o processo de amplo conhecimento come?a a ser visto como uma via residual para solu??o de conflitos. Empregando a t?cnica da documenta??o indireta, atrav?s de pesquisa bibliogr?fica, analisa-se a concep??o de tempo razo?vel do processo adequada ao processo p?trio; a rela??o entre efic?cia, efetividade, seguran?a jur?dica e o tempo razo?vel da presta??o jurisdicional; a positiva??o formal da dura??o razo?vel do processo na Constitui??o Federal de 1988, no direito internacional e em alguns pa?ses latinoamericanos; e a aplicabilidade imediata desse direito fundamental. Desenvolve-se o tema com base no vi?s constitucional de interpreta??o de direitos fundamentais e na principiologia constitucional, abordagem que ter? sempre presente a preocupa??o de pautar-se numa metodologia que contemple os campos normativo, emp?rico-dogm?tico e de concretiza??o do direito fundamental ao tempo razo?vel do processo. Adota-se como corte metodol?gico o estudo dessa problem?tica no ?mbito judicial, mais especificamente, no campo do processo trabalhista. S?o indicadas a crise do Judici?rio e a demora processual como problemas relacionados diretamente aos limites e possibilidades de concretiza??o do direito fundamental em estudo. Por fim, numa vis?o anal?tica e cr?tica, apresenta-se as conclus?es, as quais demonstram as alternativas e/ou mecanismos que podem ser utilizados na supera??o dos limites impostos ? concretiza??o imediata do direito fundamental ao tempo razo?vel do processo na justi?a do trabalho. / The present dissertation deals with the reasonable length of the process, specifically, in labor justice. In this context, we address the constitutional issues regarding the problematization of the reasonable duration of the process, as a fundamental right, as well as its applicability in labor justice. The study of the chosen topic is important because it brings the discussion about the "delay" in the jurisdictional provision, notably to the one that assures the fundamental rights of the workers, providing the analysis of the causes and consequences of the time of the process. The present work aims to develop a constitutional approach to the reasonable length of the process in labor justice, considering the reasonable time of the process in the Brazilian legal system as a fundamental right. The problem of the effects of time on the jurisdictional activity and the growing phenomenon of the summarization of procedural cognition, where the process of extensive knowledge begins to be seen as a residual way to solve conflicts. Using the technique of indirect documentation, through a bibliographical research, the design of reasonable time of the process appropriate to the process of the country is analyzed; the relationship between efficacy, effectiveness, legal certainty and the reasonable time of judicial service; the formal validation of the reasonable duration of the process in the Federal Constitution of 1988, in international law and in some Latin American countries; and the immediate applicability of this fundamental right. The theme is developed based on the constitutional bias of fundamental rights interpretation and constitutional principles, an approach that will always have the concern of being guided by a methodology that contemplates normative, empirical-dogmatic and fundamental right to time process. The study of this problematic in the judicial scope, more specifically, in the field of the labor process, is adopted as methodological section. The crisis of the Judiciary and procedural delays are indicated as problems directly related to the limits and possibilities of realization of the fundamental right under study. Finally, in an analytical and critical view, the conclusions are presented, which demonstrate the alternatives and / or mechanisms that can be used in overcoming the limits imposed to the immediate realization of the fundamental right to the reasonable time of the process in the labor courts.