Smartphones continue to grow increasingly ubiquitous for a variety of reasons. This study employed an online survey experiment in order to determine whether perceptions of environmental/locational privacy or individual levels of self-monitoring have any effect on smartphone uses and gratifications. While perceptions of locational privacy did indeed have a modest effect on smartphone gratifications sought, self-monitoring did not, and no interactions were detected between locational privacy and self-monitoring. Implications for these findings as well as avenues for future research are discussed.

No description available.

Classical sociology has seen various discussions on the tension between individuality and social solidarity. Some thought that increasing individuality may ruin the foundation of traditional society and may lead to social disintegration, while others believed that modern society is built on mutual dependence and legal-rational authority. An increase in individuality may not lead to social disintegration. The debate on personal privacy is an extension of this sociological concern. / The individual concern for privacy was said to be derived from selfishness and individualism, and led to social isolation. According to this view, people who have high concerns for their information privacy are only concerned with their own interests and would not like to sacrifice their own interests for the common good. They are also social isolates who would not like to take part in social activities. This social concern for privacy is derived from individualism in culture. However, these views are purely speculations with no empirical evidence for support. The purpose of this study is to provide an empirical test of three core questions: First, does individual concern for privacy indicate social isolation? Second, does individual concern for privacy indicate selfishness at the expense of common good? Third, does individual concern for privacy derive from cultural individualism? / To address the first question, this study used the 1990 Harris Poll and found a positive association between privacy concern and social participation. For the second question, this study used the General Social Survey and found that privacy concerns were associated with willingness to pay more tax to improve social welfare programs. As to the third question, this study used the International Social Survey Program to demonstrate that there was no association between individualism and privacy concerns. From all these findings, individual concerns regarding information privacy do not mean selfishness, do not lead to social isolation and are not derived from individualism. The results of the study call for a positive evaluation of individual privacy concerns and a thorough protection of individual autonomy. The findings of the study clarified the long-term misunderstanding of individual privacy and may be useful for policy and legal research on privacy protection. / 經典社會學的討論注意到現代社會中個人自主性的增加與社會團結之間的矛盾。由於傳統社會的團結力量逐漸減弱，有看法認為個人主義的傾向有可能會導致社會解體。同時也有看法認為，現代社會的團結是基於人與人之間功能上的相互依賴或者基於法理權威，個人主義的傾向並非一定帶來社會解體。有關於個人私隱的討論正是這個社會學所關心問題的延伸。 / 個人對私隱的關注曾經普遍被認為是來自於自私自利的個人主義傾向，關注個人私隱的人是脫離社會的孤僻者。這種看法認為個人對私隱的關注是對社會不負責任的表現，這種傾向源自於文化中的個人主義。但是這種看法忽視了當代社會公共權力愈來愈多侵入私人領域的作法。人們對私隱的關注是對私人領域遭到威脅的反應。關注個人私隱的人相反可能更加關注公民的社會權利和個人空間，也有可能更加積極參與社會事務，而不是一個自私自利的孤僻者。私隱的關注度更有可能受到制度因素，經濟因素的影響，未必一定源自於個人主義。另外，將個人對私隱的關注認為是自私自利和個人主義傾向的看法也是沒有任何實證資料證實的猜想。本研究的目的在於通過實證研究揭示三個關於私隱的核心問題。第一，關注私隱是否意味著脫離社會？第二，關注私隱是否是一種自私的傾向？第三，關注私隱是否源於個人人主義的文化？ / 為了回答第一個問題，本研究透過分析美國1990年哈里斯民意調查（Harris Poll 1990）發現個人私隱關注度與社會參與度有正向的相關關係。第二個問題則是透過分析美國社會綜合調查（GSS），本研究發現，私隱關注度與個人為提升社會福利而繳納更多稅項的意願有關。第三個問題的回答是透過分析國際社會調查項目（ISSP），本研究發現國家的個人主義文化價值觀與個人對私隱關注度之間沒有關聯。綜合以上發現，本研究認為對個人私隱關注度需要一個正面的看法，關注個人私隱的人是社會的積極參與者，也是公共利益的維護者，她們並不是自私自利的孤僻者。要降低個人對私隱的關注需要從政治制度和經濟發展角度入手而不是一味地批評個人主義傾向。本研究澄清了一個有關個人私隱的長期爭論，對相關的立法和政策研究有一定的參考價值。 / Classical sociology has seen various discussions on the tension between individuality and social solidarity. Some thought that increasing individuality may ruin the foundation of traditional society and may lead to social disintegration, while others believed that modern society is built on mutual dependence and legal-rational authority. An increase in individuality may not lead to social disintegration. The debate on personal privacy is an extension of this sociological concern. / The individual concern for privacy was said to be derived from selfishness and individualism, and led to social isolation. According to this view, people who have high concerns for their information privacy are only concerned with their own interests and would not like to sacrifice their own interests for the common good. They are also social isolates who would not like to take part in social activities. This social concern for privacy is derived from individualism in culture. However, these views are purely speculations with no empirical evidence for support. The purpose of this study is to provide an empirical test of three core questions: First, does individual concern for privacy indicate social isolation? Second, does individual concern for privacy indicate selfishness at the expense of common good? Third, does individual concern for privacy derive from cultural individualism? / To address the first question, this study used the 1990 Harris Poll and found a positive association between privacy concern and social participation. For the second question, this study used the General Social Survey and found that privacy concerns were associated with willingness to pay more tax to improve social welfare programs. As to the third question, this study used the International Social Survey Program to demonstrate that there was no association between individualism and privacy concerns. From all these findings, individual concerns regarding information privacy do not mean selfishness, do not lead to social isolation and are not derived from individualism. The results of the study call for a positive evaluation of individual privacy concerns and a thorough protection of individual autonomy. The findings of the study clarified the long-term misunderstanding of individual privacy and may be useful for policy and legal research on privacy protection. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Guo, Hua. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2012. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 133-139). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstract also in Chinese. / Chapter Chapter 1. --- Introduction --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1. --- Modernity and Privacy --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2. --- The Rise of Privacy Concern --- p.5 / Chapter 1.3. --- Concepts of Privacy --- p.8 / Chapter 1.4. --- Two Competing Views --- p.10 / Chapter 1.5. --- Purpose of This Study --- p.14 / Chapter Chapter 2. --- Data and Method --- p.20 / Chapter 2.1. --- Datasets --- p.20 / Chapter 2.2. --- Measurement --- p.22 / Chapter 2.3. --- Method --- p.26 / Chapter Chapter 3. --- Concern for Privacy and Social participation --- p.27 / Chapter 3.1. --- Introduction --- p.27 / Chapter 3.2. --- Literature review --- p.29 / Chapter 3.3. --- Model Specification --- p.36 / Chapter 3.4. --- Data and Method --- p.38 / Chapter 3.5. --- Results --- p.44 / Chapter 3.6. --- Conclusion --- p.50 / Chapter Chapter 4. --- Concern for Privacy and Common Good --- p.53 / Chapter 4.1. --- Introduction --- p.53 / Chapter 4.2. --- Literature Review --- p.55 / Chapter 4.3. --- Hypotheses and Model Specification --- p.68 / Chapter 4.4. --- Data and Method --- p.72 / Chapter 4.5. --- Results --- p.77 / Chapter 4.6. --- Conclusion --- p.82 / Chapter Chapter 5. --- Concern for Privacy and Culture Values --- p.85 / Chapter 5.1. --- Introduction --- p.85 / Chapter 5.2. --- Literature review --- p.89 / Chapter 5.3. --- Conceptual framework and Hypotheses --- p.98 / Chapter 5.4. --- Dataset and method --- p.101 / Chapter 5.5. --- Results --- p.110 / Chapter 5.6. --- Conclusion --- p.115 / Chapter 5.7. --- Limitations --- p.118 / Chapter Chapter 6. --- Conclusion --- p.121 / Annex --- p.128 / References --- p.133

Government initiatives called for electronic health records for each individual healthcare consumer by 2014. the purpose of the initiatives is to provide for the common exchange of clinical information between healthcare consumers, healthcare providers, third-party payers and public healthcare officials.This exchange of healthcare information will impact the healthcare industry and enable more effective and efficient application of healthcare so that there may be a decrease in medical errors, increase in access to quality of care tools, and enhancement of decision making abilities by healthcare consumers, healthcare providers and government health agencies. an electronic personal health record (ePHR) created, managed and accessed by healthcare consumers may be the answer to fulfilling the national initiative. However, since healthcare consumers potentially are in control of their own ePHR, the healthcare consumer’s concern for privacy may be a barrier for the effective implementation of a nationwide network of ePHR. a technology acceptance model, an information boundary theory model and a trust model were integrated to analyze usage intentions of healthcare consumers of ePHR. Results indicate that healthcare consumers feel there is a perceived usefulness of ePHR; however they may not see ePHR as easy to use. Results also indicate that the perceived usefulness of utilizing ePHR does not overcome the low perceived ease of use to the extent that healthcare consumers intend to utilize ePHR. in addition, healthcare consumers may not understand the different components of usage: access, management, sharing and facilitating third-party ePHR. Also, demographics, computer self-efficacy, personal innovativeness, healthcare need and healthcare literacy impact a healthcare consumer’s privacy concerns and trusting intentions in the context of ePHR and intent to utilize ePHR. Finally, this research indicates that healthcare consumers may need a better understanding of the Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) regulations of ePHR as well as a better understanding of the impact HIPAA has on websites that may facilitate ePHR.

"The use of behavioral targeting practices provides ad networks with the opportunity to tailor ads to the individual characteristics of users. As privacy concerns over behavioral targeting have been growing lately, an increasing number of ad networks offer ad preferences managers (APMs) that show collected and/or inferred information about users. The focus of our study is to investigate the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in such APMs. On the basis of our experimental results, we propose a structured methodology for APM validation. We also assess how third parties render ads based on users’ browsing behavior. Our findings reveal cases in which even sensitive information is leaked as part of an HTTP header and is used to serve ads on multiple sites. The third parties examined in this study include an intent-focused data exchange (BlueKai) and a social network (Facebook) along with the ad networks owned by AOL, Google, and Yahoo!."

Since nearly two decades threats to public security through events such as 9/11, the Madrid (2004) and London (2005) bombings and more recently the Paris attacks (2015) resulted in the adoption of a plethora of national and EU measures aiming at fighting terrorism and serious crime. In addition, the Snowden revelations brought the privacy and data protection implications of these public security measures into the spotlight. In this highly contentious context, three EU data retention and access measures have been introduced for the purpose of fighting serious crime and terrorism: The Data Retention Directive (DRD), the EU-US PNR Agreement and the EU-US SWIFT Agreement. All three regimes went through several revisions (SWIFT, PNR) or have been annulled (DRD) exemplifying the difficulty of determining how privacy and data protection ought to be protected in the context of public security. The trigger for this research is to understand the underlying causes of these difficulties by examining the problem from different angles. The thesis applies the theory of 'New Institutionalism' (NI) which allows both a political and legal analysis of privacy and data protection in the public security context. According to NI, 'institutions' are defined as the operational framework in which actors interact and they steer the behaviours of the latter in the policy-making cycle. By focusing on the three data retention and access regimes, the aim of this thesis is to examine how the EU 'institutional framework' shapes data protection and privacy in regard to data retention and access measures in the public security context. Answering this research question the thesis puts forward three main hypotheses: (i) privacy and data protection in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) is an institutional framework in transition where historic and new features determine how Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU) are shaped; (ii) policy outcomes on Articles 7 and 8 CFREU are influenced by actors' strategic preferences pursued in the legislation-making process; and (iii) privacy and data protection are framed by the evolution of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from a 'legal basis arbiter' to a political actor in its own right as a result of the constitutional changes brought by the Lisbon Treaty.

Thesis. 1976. M.S.--Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Political Science. / Microfiche copy available in Archives and Dewey. / Includes bibliographical references. / M.S.

The purpose of this study was to assess the level of privacy among the elderly living in long-term nursing and communal facilities. The data was collected through a probability sampling at the Veterans Home of California in Barstow.

Public street surveillance, a domain of Closed Circuit Television (CCTV), has grown enormously and is becoming common place with increasing utilization in society as an all-purpose security tool. Previous authors (Ditton, 1999; Davies, 1998; Horne, 1998; Tomkins, 1998) have raised concern over social, civil and privacy issues, but there has been limited research to quantify these concerns. There are a number of core aspects that could relocate the risk perception and therefore, social support of public street surveillance. This study utilized the psychometric paradigm to quantitatively measure the social risk perception of public street surveillance. The psychometric paradigm is a method that presents risk perception in a two factor representation, being dread risk and familiarity to risk. Four additional control activities and technologies were tested, being radioactive waste, drinking water chlorination, coal mining disease and home swimming pools. Analysis included spatial representation, and multidimensional scaling (MDS) Euclidean and INDSCAL methods. The study utilized a seven point Likert scale, pre and post methodology, and had a target population of N=2106, with a sample of N=135 (alpha=0.7).

The basis of this study was my belief that the introduction of the present privacy legislation had been done in such a "try and see" manner. To me, the whole process "begged" for a much closer look to try to understand the rationale behind successive governments' decisions on this policy initiative. I begin my look at the process from the 1960s as this is when general public concern for the security of personal information was high. I then move to the introduction of the proposed Australia Card and its demise and then to the present. Then, with reference to the "classic" policy analysis authors, I show that the implementation of federal privacy laws in Australia was an excellent example of how not to go about convincing the public the new laws would offer the protection they, the public, sought. I also explore the reasons behind negative lobbying by certain non-government sector interests to demonstrate how this sector has influenced government thinking. As an example of the study of a policy issue this thesis shows the effect a lack of planning, and a terrible lack of communication, can have on the introduction of any new legislation. Much of this is due to the fact that the real issue behind the introduction of privacy legislation was that of increasing taxation revenue and not the protection of individuals' privacy. The privacy legislation was the "sweetener" the government believed was needed to satisfy the general public's concerns so that the government could achieve the desired result for its taxation revenue policy.