1 |
Ribonucleotide reductase of herpes virusesSun, Yunming January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
MECHANISMS OF TYPE-I IFN INHIBITION: EQUINE HERPESVIRUS-1 ESCAPE FROM THE ANTIVIRAL EFFECT OF TYPE-1 INTERFERON RESPONSE IN HOST CELLOladunni, Fatai S. 01 January 2019 (has links)
Equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) is one of the most important and prevalent viral pathogens of horses causing a major threat to the equine industry throughout most of the world. EHV-1 primarily causes respiratory disease but viral spread to distant organs enables the development of more severe sequelae; abortion and neurologic disease. In order to produce disease, EHV-1 has to overcome the innate barrier of the type-I interferon (IFN) system in host cells. However, the underlying mechanisms employed by EHV-1 to circumvent the type-I IFN response in host cells are not well understood. In this project study, using molecular techniques, we explored how EHV-1 is able to escape the type-I IFN response in host cells during infection. We also investigated whether EHV-4, a closely related but less pathogenic virus, has similar effects on type-I IFN as a clue to understanding how widespread IFN suppressive function is found among equine alphaherpesviruses.
Our data showed that inhibition of the type-I IFN response in host cells is not a function of neuropathogenicity of EHV-1 strains. However, a reduced type-I IFN response correlated with pathogenicity as EHV-4, unlike EHV-1, was unable to down-regulate the type-I IFN response in equine endothelial cells (EECs). Investigation of the mechanisms employed by EHV-1 to suppress type-I IFN revealed that the virus sequentially prevented outside-in signaling events that lead to type-I IFN production. Specifically, EHV-1 blocked the expression of Toll-like receptors (TLR) 3 and TLR4 at 6 hours post-infection (hpi) and 12 hpi. EHV-1 also prevented the transcription of IRF7 and IRF9 at different time-points during infection. The virus also perturbed the JAK-STAT signaling pathway by negatively regulating the cellular levels of TYK2 and phosphorylation-mediated activation of STAT2 molecules. Immunofluorescence data revealed that during infection, EHV-1 was able to sequester STAT2 molecules from nuclear translocation. This may be a limiting step preventing the formation of interferon- stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) whose nuclear translocation is required to transactivate interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) including IRF7.
Further investigation showed that unlike EHV-1, EHV-4 only interfered with phosphorylation-mediated activated STAT1 and STAT2 molecules at 3 and 6 hpi. EHV-4 was unable to block TLR3/4 and IRF7/9 mRNA expression at any time-point. Intriguingly, while viral late gene of EHV-1 mediates inhibition of STAT phosphorylation, our data showed that for EHV-4, a virus late gene did not mediate the inhibition of STAT phosphorylation. The findings from this study help illuminate how EHV-1 strategically interferes with limiting steps required for type-I IFN response in host cells to promote pathology. Our data also strengthen the hypothesis that the ability to shut off host factors required for type-I IFN production might be directly related to the degree of pathogenicity of the EHV subtypes.
|
Page generated in 0.0118 seconds