This study investigates the development of a collaborative approach to instructional planning, in the context of a local, natural instructional setting in the educational system of a Caribbean island. Parallel teams of planners are brought together from both the development and the delivery systems of this instructional context; to develop an instructional plan of their choice. / The collaborative instructional exercise is developed as a series of planning sessions--utilizing the mechanism of a small group interaction/problem-solving process. The group of 12 main, direct participants consists of six developers and six deliverers of instruction. Data collection is done by means of preliminary questionnaire/survey and documents reviews; by in-process interviews by discussions, observations, recordings, documents reviews; and by post-planning interviews of individual participants. A comprehensive review of related literature is also presented, to put this study in perspective and lay the basis for useful analysis. Analysis of the collaborative planning process and description of the emergent model are presented in terms of the opinions, decisions, behaviors/actions, and approaches of the participants. Within-group comparisons are made in terms of the respective roles played by each team of planners, and in terms of the relative contributions of individuals in each team. / Findings of the investigation reveal that both sets of planners considered more elements that traditionally prescribed and described in instructional models. / Furthermore, the planners introduced new dimensions to, and derived new meanings from, aspects of the planning process. Findings of this study support some findings of earlier research studies (e.g., that instructional planners do not systematically follow the prescriptive models of instructional planning and development. It was also shown, however, that planners in this study context do use some traditional elements in the development of their own approach. The collaborative planning approach (model) that emerged is described, and implications for applications to the context are suggested. Implications for further research into collaborative planning are also discussed. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-01, Section: A, page: 0077. / Major Professor: Robert Morgan. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 1994.

No description available.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-06, Section: A, page: . Adviser: Walter Feinberg. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 201-210) Available on microfilm from Pro Quest Information and Learning.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-06, Section: A, page: . Adviser: Wynne S. Korr. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 209-220) Available on microfilm from Pro Quest Information and Learning.

Not available / text

No description available.

No description available.

From my previous community work, I had a sense that recognizing the pattern of how and why public stories emerge in public dialogue was an important part of understanding and strengthening a democratic public culture. I studied the public dialogue of the University of Arizona Faculty Senate in part because I belong to this community. I observed six public meetings of the faculty senate, developed field notes, analytical memos, listened to and transcribed the audiotapes of the faculty meetings, and analyzed the sixteen public stories from those meetings. I developed a new research methodology for understanding public stories in public dialogue which uses combined perspectives of ethnographic, conversational and narrative analysis. I analyzed the research through the lens and audiophone of a critical ethnographer in order to see and hear the public stories in public dialogue and understand the faculty senate's democratic public culture. The results of my research show that the UA faculty senate's public speech is partially demonstrated by public speech which includes public stories in public dialogue. The results show that the democratic public culture of the UA faculty senate is functional, fragile and fragmented. This juxtaposition of characteristics is, to some degree, mediated by public stories which develop as trigger stories. Trigger stories are produced when one of Grice's conversational maxims--functioning as norms of interaction--quality or quantity is violated. In this research, other norms of interpretation, specifically, equality as moral power or relationship building do not generate trigger stories. This research is important for understanding and strengthening the public speech of the UA faculty senate and its democratic public culture. Also, the method of story and dialogue analysis developed in this research can be applied to other democratic public cultures.

No description available.

Feminist pedagogical aims and strategies have been discussed in a variety of articles and essays and in a few recent books. This thesis explores feminist discourse on pedagogies and attempts to reconstruct the development of these discourses historically. Early writings on feminist pedagogies were the product of the action-oriented feminism of the 1970s and focused on classroom practices, while recent works, rooted in the larger framework of poststructuralist feminism, engage in a complex theoretical dialogue with the philosophical narratives and counternarratives that oriented emancipatory pedagogies and problematized the boundaries between feminist and other emancipatory pedagogies. The thesis comprises an analysis of the historical and theoretical implications of the literature on feminist pedagogies, and an ethnographic part based on six interviews with Professors of Women's Studies at the University of Arizona, who were asked to discuss the meanings, possibilities and predicaments of feminist teaching in a large research University.