Current research suggests that a high level of confidence and a low level of anxiety are predictive of higher math achievement. Compared to students from other provinces, previous research has found that Saskatchewan students have a higher level of confidence and a lower level of anxiety for learning math, but still tend to achieve lower math scores compared to students in other provinces. The data suggest that there may be unique factors effecting math learning for students in Saskatchewan. The purpose of the study is to determine the factors that may affect Saskatchewan students math achievement. Exploratory factor analyses and regression methods were employed to investigate possible traits that aid students in achieving higher math scores. Results from a 2007 math assessment administered to grade 5 students in Saskatchewan were used for the current study. The goal of the study was to provide a better understanding of the factors and trends unique to students for mathematic achievements in Saskatchewan.<p> Using results from a province-wide math assessment and an accompanying questionnaire administered to students in grade five across public school in Saskatchewan (n=11,279), the present study found statistical significance in three factors that have been supported by previous studies to influence math achievement differences, specifically in (1) confidence in math, (2) parental involvement in math and (3) extracurricular participation in math. The three aforementioned factors were found to be related to math achievement as predicted by the Assessment for Learning (AFL) program in Saskatchewan, although there were reservations to the findings due to a weak amount of variances accounted for in the regression model (r2 =.084). Furthermore, a multivariate analysis of variance indicated gender and locations of schools to have effects on students math achievement scores. Although a high amount of measurement errors in the questionnaire (and subsequently a low variance accounted for by the regression model) limited the scope and implications of the model, future implications and improvements are discussed

Current research suggests that a high level of confidence and a low level of anxiety are predictive of higher math achievement. Compared to students from other provinces, previous research has found that Saskatchewan students have a higher level of confidence and a lower level of anxiety for learning math, but still tend to achieve lower math scores compared to students in other provinces. The data suggest that there may be unique factors effecting math learning for students in Saskatchewan. The purpose of the study is to determine the factors that may affect Saskatchewan students math achievement. Exploratory factor analyses and regression methods were employed to investigate possible traits that aid students in achieving higher math scores. Results from a 2007 math assessment administered to grade 5 students in Saskatchewan were used for the current study. The goal of the study was to provide a better understanding of the factors and trends unique to students for mathematic achievements in Saskatchewan.<p> Using results from a province-wide math assessment and an accompanying questionnaire administered to students in grade five across public school in Saskatchewan (n=11,279), the present study found statistical significance in three factors that have been supported by previous studies to influence math achievement differences, specifically in (1) confidence in math, (2) parental involvement in math and (3) extracurricular participation in math. The three aforementioned factors were found to be related to math achievement as predicted by the Assessment for Learning (AFL) program in Saskatchewan, although there were reservations to the findings due to a weak amount of variances accounted for in the regression model (r2 =.084). Furthermore, a multivariate analysis of variance indicated gender and locations of schools to have effects on students math achievement scores. Although a high amount of measurement errors in the questionnaire (and subsequently a low variance accounted for by the regression model) limited the scope and implications of the model, future implications and improvements are discussed

Traditional histories of Canadian education pursue an east/west perspective, with progress accompanying settlement westward from Ontario. This history of Saskatchewan education posits, instead, a north-south perspective, embracing the US cultural routes for the province’s educational development from 1905 until 1937. I emphasize the transplantation of US Midwestern and Plains culture to the province of Saskatchewan through cultural transfer of agrarian movements, political forms of revolt, and through adopting shared meanings of democracy and the relationship of the West relative to the East. Physiographic similarities between Saskatchewan and the American Plains fostered similar moralistic political cultures and largely identical solutions to identical problems. This larger cultural transfer facilitated developments in Saskatchewan K-12 education that paralleled movements in the US milieu through appropriating into the province’s system of schooling American teachers into classrooms, American school textbooks, teacher training textbooks written in the US, and through the pursuit of American graduate training by Saskatchewan Normal School instructors. This resulted in the articulation in the US and Saskatchewan of a “rural school problem,” consolidation as its only solution, and the transplantation of a language of school reform identified by Herbert Kliebard as “social efficiency.” The invitation issued by the government of Saskatchewan in 1917 to an American expert on rural schooling, Harold Foght, to survey the province’s system of schooling and make recommendations for its reform, marked a high point in American influence in the province of Saskatchewan’s system of schooling. In higher education the province’s sole university, the University of Saskatchewan, mirrored even more closely American Midwestern and Plains models. Essentially, the U of S was a transplanted version of the University of Wisconsin. Under the guidance of the University’s first President, Walter C. Murray, the “Wisconsin idea” permeated the practice and meaning of his University. His persistent pursuit of Carnegie Foundation financial support throughout his tenure meant Murray had to pattern his university after its American antecedents. Though Murray largely failed to gain substantial financial support for the U of S, the result was a university identical to many American land grant and public universities.

This thesis explores the experience of dialect speakers of Indigenous English in the Standard English School. Indigenous English is a dialect of English spoken by many Aboriginal people in Canada; it is especially discernable in the Prairie Provinces, yet it is not widely recognized by the majority of the population. This classroom study was conducted in a semi-urban community in East Central Saskatchewan. The focus of the research was six children in a Grade 3 classroom, four of whom are First Nations and Indigenous English Speakers. The remaining two children are White and speakers of Standard English. The results of this study indicate that the First Nations children of this study speak a dialect of English that differs phonologically, morphologically, syntactically, and lexically from the Standard English spoken in Saskatchewan. These children are all below grade level in Language Arts and follow modified programs. They experience difficulty in phonics and spelling and are receiving additional support from classroom assistants, resource room teachers and speech pathologists. It would also appear that these children are experiencing institutional racism in a number of forms. Possible resolutions to the problems faced by these students may include teacher training and dialect awareness classes. This field has not been adequately explored and further research is needed to discover viable solutions to the issues experienced by dialect speakers of Indigenous English in the Standard English classroom.

No description available.

This study was designed to investigate concerns with respect to the delivery of special education services in reserve schools, to identify the special needs of children attending these schools, and to study means of identifying and assessing children with special needs. The information obtained was used to develop a special education funding formula which would be more sensitive and responsive to the specific needs of Indian students in schools on reserves in Saskatchewan.<p> The study which was an exploratory field study involved two or more days of intensive discussion between the researcher and various groups of people on each of six reserves. At the conclusion of the study, a committee comprised of representatives of each band met with the researcher to review the findings and to make recommendations.<p> The study addressed three main areas of concern-the identification and assessment of special education students, the special needs of students in reserve schools, and funding arrangements. Results indicated that current procedures for identifying and assessing special education students are vague, costly, and time-consuming. As well, bands do not have easy access to the qualified personnel to do the identification and/or testing. It was also discovered that large numbers of students in reserve schools are handicapped because they are severely disadvantaged, seriously age-grade misplaced, and/or severely emotionally deprived. These categories of handicap, although not recognized by the the special education funding formulas, do interfere with the academic achievement and success of the students. Bands are experiencing problems with the current funding arrangements. Inadequacy of funds to cover the costs of delivering appropriate programming, lack of firm policies and procedures for accessing and allocating funds or to direct the process of delivering funds to the band level, and ineffective systems at the band level for administering special education funds are the chief problems.<p> It was recommended that the funding formula should consist of three components--a low cost component to offset the costs of programming for the mildly to moderately handicapped; a special needs component to cover the costs of programming required beyond what is provided through the low cost component; a support services component to cover the costs of education psychologists, classroom consultants, speech therapists, and other consultant services. As well, it was stressed that for such a formula to be truly functional, well-defined policies and procedures would have to be developed and implemented.

This study was designed to investigate concerns with respect to the delivery of special education services in reserve schools, to identify the special needs of children attending these schools, and to study means of identifying and assessing children with special needs. The information obtained was used to develop a special education funding formula which would be more sensitive and responsive to the specific needs of Indian students in schools on reserves in Saskatchewan.<p> The study which was an exploratory field study involved two or more days of intensive discussion between the researcher and various groups of people on each of six reserves. At the conclusion of the study, a committee comprised of representatives of each band met with the researcher to review the findings and to make recommendations.<p> The study addressed three main areas of concern-the identification and assessment of special education students, the special needs of students in reserve schools, and funding arrangements. Results indicated that current procedures for identifying and assessing special education students are vague, costly, and time-consuming. As well, bands do not have easy access to the qualified personnel to do the identification and/or testing. It was also discovered that large numbers of students in reserve schools are handicapped because they are severely disadvantaged, seriously age-grade misplaced, and/or severely emotionally deprived. These categories of handicap, although not recognized by the the special education funding formulas, do interfere with the academic achievement and success of the students. Bands are experiencing problems with the current funding arrangements. Inadequacy of funds to cover the costs of delivering appropriate programming, lack of firm policies and procedures for accessing and allocating funds or to direct the process of delivering funds to the band level, and ineffective systems at the band level for administering special education funds are the chief problems.<p> It was recommended that the funding formula should consist of three components--a low cost component to offset the costs of programming for the mildly to moderately handicapped; a special needs component to cover the costs of programming required beyond what is provided through the low cost component; a support services component to cover the costs of education psychologists, classroom consultants, speech therapists, and other consultant services. As well, it was stressed that for such a formula to be truly functional, well-defined policies and procedures would have to be developed and implemented.