Spelling suggestions: "subject:"educationization"" "subject:"educationational""
1 |
Pro-poor growth and education in the Northeast / Crescimento prÃ-pobre e educaÃÃo no NordesteRafael Barros Barbosa 17 January 2011 (has links)
CoordenaÃÃo de AperfeiÃoamento de Pessoal de NÃvel Superior / This work aims to analyze the impact of education, measured as average years of schooling
mean, and educational inequality on poverty reduction and promotion of economic growth
to Northeast states in the period 1995-2008. In order to meet these objectives, three
econometric models are applied: 1) a panel model such that income of poor is the
dependent variable; 2)a multinomial model with panel data that used Kakwani-Pernia index
as dependent variable and 3) an ordered multinomial model, considering three earning
thresholds for indigents, poors and nonpoors based upon poverty lines. According to PNAD
data, excepting the Census of 2000, the results allow to conclude that: i) average schooling
plays an important role to explain the pro-poor growth in Northeast, ii) educational
inequality has a substantial impact on poverty reduction and pro-poor growth. / Este trabalho tem o objetivo de analisar o impacto da educaÃÃo, medida atravÃs da
escolaridade media e desigualdade educacional, na reduÃÃo da pobreza e na geraÃÃo de
crescimento econÃmico do Nordeste no perÃodo 1995â 2008. Para tanto, sÃo utilizados trÃs
modelos economÃtricos: 1)Dados em painel tomando como variÃvel dependente a renda
dos pobres; 2) Multinomial com dados em painel tendo como variÃvel dependente o Ãndice
de Kakwani-Pernia; 3)Multinomial ordenado considerando trÃs nÃveis de renda que
delimitam os indigentes, pobres e nÃo-pobres. Com base em dados da PNAD e excetuando
o Censo de 2000, os resultados dos trÃs modelos permitiram extrair os seguintes principais
pontos conclusivos: i) a escolaridade mÃdia à um fator preponderante para a explicaÃÃo do
crescimento prÃ-pobre no Nordeste, ii) a desigualdade educacional surge como um
elemento importante para a explicaÃÃo tanto da pobreza como da presenÃa de crescimento
prÃ-pobre.
|
2 |
Development and evaluation of a nutrition education programme for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a resource limited setting of the Moretele sub-district, North West Province (South Africa)Muchiri, Jane Wanjiku 10 July 2013 (has links)
Background: Diabetes self-management education, including nutrition education (NE) is an essential component of diabetes management. Effective NE can assist individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in resource limited settings to improve their dietary self-care; an area cited among the most difficult with consequent improvement in health outcomes. Aim: To develop a NE programme that is tailored to the needs of adults with type 2 DM in a resource limited setting and to evaluate the programme's effectiveness on health outcomes. Setting: Makapanstad and Mathibestad community health centres in the Moretele sub-district, North West Province (South Africa). Methods: The study was done in three phases employing mixed methods research. Qualitative methods, using focus group discussions with 31 diabetic patients (a convenience purposive sample), and an open ended self-administered questionnaire with ten health professionals serving them, assessed the NE needs and preferences (phase 1). The data were analysed according to the framework approach. The results from the needs assessment were used to plan a tailored NE programme (phase 2). A randomised controlled trial (quantitative) with a sample of 82 patients (with HbA1c ≥ 8), allocated to either intervention or control groups, evaluated the effect of the NE programme (phase 3). Outcomes [HbA1c, dietary behaviours, blood lipids, blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), diabetes knowledge and attitudes towards diabetes and its treatment] were assessed at baseline, six months and 12 months respectively. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) compared the groups on measured outcomes using baseline values, age, gender, and clinic as covariates. Rank ANCOVA was used for dietary intake. The level of significance for all tests was set at α < 0.05 for a two-tailed test. Results: Needs assessment Diabetes related knowledge deficits and inappropriate dietary practices, including food portion control problems, inadequate intake of vegetables and fruits and unbalanced diets, were observed. Eight barriers and two facilitators to dietary adherence were identified. Financial constraint was the major barrier while social support was the major facilitator. NE recommendations included content related to the disease and diet, group education at the clinic, a competent educator, provision of education materials and inclusion of family members. The planned NE programme consisted of eight weekly training sessions and six follow-up sessions (monthly and bi-monthly), vegetable gardening demonstrations and education materials. Nutrition education programme effects: Seventy six participants (38 per group) completed the study. The differences in HbA1c (primary outcome) between the intervention and control groups were -0.62% (p=0.15) at six months and -0.67% (p=0.16) at 12 months. Few participants, four from the intervention group and one from the control group, achieved HbA1c target (<7%) at both six and 12 months, [(p=0.20), (p=0.36)] respectively. There were no significant between group differences in BMI, lipid profile and blood pressure at six months and 12 months. Starchy foods intake (median servings) were significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group, 9.3 vs. 10.8 (p=0.005) at six months and 9.9 vs. 11.9 (p=0.017) at 12 months. The proportion of participants growing own vegetables significantly increased in the intervention group compared to the control group 17/41 vs. 5/40 (p=0.003) at six months and 16/38 vs. 5/38 at 12 months. No significant group differences in the intake of energy, macronutrients, vegetable and fruits, sodium, cholesterol and fibre were observed at six and 12 months. Diabetes knowledge improved in the intervention group +0.95 (p=0.033) and +2.2 (p=0.000) when compared with the control group at six and 12 months respectively. There were no significant group differences in the attitudes towards diabetes and its treatment. Conclusions: The qualitative needs assessment provided insight for planning a tailored NE programme. The NE improved some dietary behaviours (starchy foods portion control and growing own vegetables) and diabetes knowledge. A non-significant lowering of HbA1c was observed. / Thesis (Phd)--University of Pretoria, 2013. / Human Nutrition / unrestricted
|
Page generated in 0.0722 seconds