The aim of this study was to investigate noise levels in the New Zealand health industry. The goal was to investigate the room acoustics and the characteristics of the noise sources along with noise exposure of health care workers, in New Zealand, in dental clinics and orthopaedic cast clinics and assess whether they are at risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). A literature review was conducted to determine the definition, cause, and ways to prevent NIHL in relation to the dental clinics and orthopaedic cast clinics. Also determined from a review of the literature were ways to assess and monitor the acoustics of these spaces. Initially room acoustic measurements of background noise levels as well as reverberation times were made and frequency information on the major noise sources was obtained. This was followed by measurement of the daily noise dose exposure of staff working in the participating dental clinics and orthopaedic cast clinics. It was found that noise dose levels did not exceed the damage risk criterion set by The New Zealand Occupational Safety and Health Service of Leq8h of 85 dBA and therefore staff were considered to not be at risk of NIHL. However, the background noise levels measured may be putting healthcare workers at risk of non-auditory related effects of noise exposure, affecting work performance, cognitive abilities and vital communication between staff and patients. Healthcare workers may also be at risk of non-auditory health effects due to increased noise annoyance leading to raised stress levels, which may ultimately lead to pathophysiological changes in the myocardium. Future research in the area of noise levels in the New Zealand health industry should be performed to obtain noise data on a larger sample and look further at the non-auditory health effects of exposure to noise in the health industry.

Background: Wind turbines are a form of renewable energy, which generate electricity from wind energy, a practice dating back over 100 years. More recently, large-scale wind energy developments have started to employ one or several industrial wind turbines, which produce the majority of wind energy in Ontario. The production of electricity from the movement of industrial wind turbine motor blades creates both mechanical and aerodynamic noise. This type of environmental noise is a growing public health concern, especially for residents living close to industrial wind turbines. A body of evidence now exists to suggest that industrial wind turbine noise can impair health and contribute to annoyance and sleep disturbance. However, in Ontario, little is known about how industrial wind turbines impact people living in their vicinity. Objectives: This investigation was a cross-sectional study involving eight Ontario communities that contain greater than ten industrial wind turbines. The objectives of this study were to explore the association between proximity to industrial wind turbines and self-reported health effects, specifically quality of life (both physical and mental health) and sleep disturbance, in residents living close to wind turbines. Dose-response relationships were also explored in an attempt to investigate acceptable exposure levels and appropriate setback distances for industrial wind turbines. Methods: Eight wind farms in Ontario were selected for analysis. For this cross-sectional study, the ???Quality of Life and Renewable Energy Technologies Study??? survey was used to measure the impact of industrial wind turbines on health. Using Canada Post???s Unaddressed Admail Service, surveys were sent to 4,876 residences near industrial wind turbines in these eight communities. Survey responses were sent back to the University of Waterloo and data from the surveys were used for analysis. Descriptive analyses were performed and multiple regression models were run to investigate the effect of the main independent variable of interest (distance to nearest industrial wind turbine) on the various outcome variables. Descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations were performed on a number of dependent and independent variables including age, sex, time in home, number of industrial wind turbines within 2,000 meters and sleep and health outcomes. Results: In total, 412 surveys were returned (8.45% response rate); 16 of these survey respondents did not provide their home address. Therefore, 396 surveys were included in the analysis. The mean self-reported distances of survey respondents to wind farms was 2,782 meters +-3,950 meters (range: 0.40-55,000 meters). The mean calculated distance from residence to the closest industrial wind turbine was 4,523 meters +-4,420 meters (range: 316-22,661 meters). The difference between the calculated and perceived distance measurements was statistically significant (P<0.001) with survey respondents reporting that they live, on average, 1,741 meters closer to wind farms than they actually do. The relationship between Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and ln(distance) was found to be statistically significant (P=0.01) when controlling for age, gender and county, meaning that as distance increased (move further away from an industrial wind turbine), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index decreased (i.e. sleep improved) in a logarithmic relationship. Among the eight Wind Turbine Syndrome index variables, the relationship between vertigo and ln(distance) was statistically significant (P<0.001) when controlling for age, gender, and county. Additionally, the relationship between tinnitus and ln(distance) approached statistical significance (P=0.08) when controlling for age, gender and county. Both vertigo and tinnitus were worse among participants living closer to industrial wind turbines. Conclusion: Study findings suggest that industrial wind turbines could have an impact on health. Using a sample of rural Ontario residents (although not necessarily representative of the target population), this study explored the quality of life (both physical and mental health) and sleep disturbance of residents living in the vicinity of industrial wind turbines. However, because of study limitations, there are many questions still to be answered before firm conclusions can be drawn. Based on the findings of this study it is recommended that further studies be carried out to examine the effects of low-level stressors, such as industrial wind turbine noise, on health. Specifically, study findings suggest that future research should focus on the effects of industrial wind turbine noise on sleep disturbance and symptoms of inner ear problems. Although the study findings could suggest that there is a possible association between various health outcomes and how far someone lives from an industrial wind turbine, it is important to remember that there are limitations to these conclusions.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-05-14T12:47:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 arquivototal.pdf: 2059659 bytes, checksum: f3d773c696e3797e353a21eae5946320 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-03-22 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES / INTRODUCTION: NIHL (Noise Induced Hearing Loss) is a condition that results from the accumulation of prolonged exposure to noise, causing a slow and progressive hearing impairment, sensorneural, not very deep, but irreversible. The dentist, individuals exposed to noise in their workplace, is susceptible to NIHL. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the auditory and possible risk factors that interfere with the hearing of the dentists from USFs (Unidades de Saúde da Família / Familiar Health Unities) in Joao Pessoa / PB. METHODOLOGY: There were interviews, audiological evaluations, instrumental and environmental noises within 65 dentists from Family Health Units in Joao Pessoa / PB to identify auditory characteristics and risk factors for hearing-surgeons dentists by using proportion measures calculation for categorical variables, and having the Statistical Logistic Regression Method. RESULTS: It was observed that 43.07% of the dentists who were evaluated had lower hearing in, at least, some of the characteristic frequencies of NIHL. It was found that the main ear symptoms cited by these professionals were to have the sensation of hearing loss (55%), and buzzer (50%), and also that the instruments which showed values above the allowed limits were turbine high rotation (61%) and the compressor (55%). The variables considered as risk factors for hearing loss based on logistic regression were: age over 45 years old, working time more than 10 years, a feeling of hearing loss, tinnitus and noise level of the compressor greater than 85 dB. CONCLUSION: The ear symptoms (tinnitus and hearing loss) are presented in a large number of dentists, and the noise emitted by the instruments used by these professionals is often high, presenting some risk factors for Noise Induced Hearing Loss and some of them may be prevented or controlled through specific strategies. / INTRODUÇÃO: A Perda Auditiva Induzida por Ruído (PAIR) é uma patologia decorrente do acúmulo de exposições a ruído prolongadas, gerando uma deterioração auditiva progressiva e lenta, sensorioneural, geralmente não muito profunda mas irreversível. Sabe-se que o cirurgião-dentista, indivíduo exposto ao ruído no ambiente de trabalho, é susceptível à PAIR. OBJETIVO: Analisar o perfil auditivo e possíveis fatores de risco que interferem na audição dos cirurgiões-dentistas das USFs (Unidades de Saúde da Família) de João Pessoa/PB. METODOLOGIA: Realizaram-se entrevistas, avaliações audiológicas e dos ruídos instrumental e ambiental com 65 cirurgiões-dentistas das Unidades de Saúde da Família de João Pessoa /PB, a fim de identificar características do perfil auditivo e de fatores de risco para a audição dos cirurgiões-dentistas, utilizando o cálculo de medidas de proporção para as variáveis categóricas, e tendo como método estatístico a Regressão Logística. RESULTADOS: Observou-se que 43,07% dos cirurgiões-dentistas avaliados apresentaram rebaixamento auditivo em pelo menos alguma das frequências características da PAIR. Verificou-se ainda que os principais sintomas otológicos citados por estes profissionais foram a sensação de déficit auditivo (55%), e o zumbido (50%). Os instrumentos que mais se apresentaram com valores de intensidade acima dos limites permitidos foram a turbina de alta rotação (61%) e o compressor (55%). As variáveis consideradas como fatores de risco para a perda auditiva com base na Regressão Logística foram: idade acima de 45 anos, tempo de trabalho maior que 10 anos e nível de ruído do compressor maior que 85 dB, além da presença dos sintomas de sensação de déficit auditivo e zumbido. CONCLUSÃO: A sintomatologia otológica (zumbido e diminuição auditiva) está presente em grande número dos cirurgiões-dentistas e o ruído emitido pelos instrumentos utilizados por estes profissionais é muitas vezes elevado. Constataram-se alguns fatores de risco para a Perda Auditiva Induzida por Ruído, podendo alguns destes ser prevenidos ou controlados por meio de estratégias específicas.