Spelling suggestions: "subject:"english additional language (EAL)"" "subject:"3nglish additional language (EAL)""
1 |
A study of perceived classroom language proficiency of pre-service teachersPeyper, Tamrynne Jean January 2014 (has links)
In the South African context, it is currently assumed by most role players in
education that teacher graduates are proficient in the medium of instruction they will
use once they start their careers. This may be a reason why currently there is no
mandatory testing of teachers‟ language proficiency. Due to social, economic and
historical factors, English has become the medium of instruction at most educational
institutions in South Africa, yet less than 10% of the population speak English as a
home language. Consequently, an overwhelming number of learners are being
taught in a language other than their home language and often by teachers not
adequately prepared to teach through the medium of English. In the absence of
mandatory testing and with the complex language situation in South African
classrooms, this case study aimed to determine the perceptions held by pre-service
teachers and their mentors regarding their English proficiency at entry to the
teaching profession. This was done by answering the following research question:
What is the perceived Classroom English proficiency of final year pre-service
teachers prior to graduating?
The conceptual framework was grounded in Uys‟s (2006) model of Classroom
English proficiency and the methodology employed was quantitative in nature.
Instruments used to collect data included an observation schedule completed by
mentor teachers observing pre-service teachers presenting the fifth lesson of their
first internship period, and a questionnaire completed by the pre-service teacher
directly after the observed lesson. Both instruments were adapted from Elder‟s
Classroom Language Assessment Schedule (1993, 2001), and each included 42
items related to various language proficiency variables rated on a four-point Likert
scale.
Data were analysed using various statistical measures comparing groups and subgroups
within the sample. Key findings included a significant statistical difference
between how English Home Language (EHL) pre-service teachers perceived their
language proficiency and those who are English Additional Language (EAL) preservice
teachers. EHL pre-service teachers perceived their Classroom English
proficiency better than EAL pre-service teachers. The same trend was evident
among the perceptions of mentor teachers. Pedagogical language and voice skills emerged as areas in which additional support was required by EAL pre-service
teachers.
Further research avenues to explore relate to the feasibility of administering refined
instruments among teachers to determine not only what the perceptions would be on
a national level but also to assess their Classroom English proficiency, followed by
possible interventions. / Dissertation (MEd)--University of Pretoria, 2014. / lk2014 / Social Studies Education / MEd / Unrestricted
|
2 |
The iconicity of picture communication symbols for children with English additional language and intellectual disabilitiesHuguet, Alice Audrey 15 July 2012 (has links)
Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) provides many individuals who have little or no functional speech with a means to enter the world of communication. Aided and/or unaided symbols are used as a means of reception and expression to create shared meaning. The selection of an appropriate symbol set/system is vital and iconicity plays a central role in this process. The Western-based symbol set, Picture Communication Symbols (PCS) (Johnson, 1981), is readily available and widely used in South Africa, despite little information existing on its iconicity to South African populations with disabilities. This study aimed to determine the iconicity of Picture Communication Symbols (PCS) for children with English Additional Language (EAL) and intellectual disability. A quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive design was used. Thirty participants between the ages of 12;00 and 15;11 (years; months) with EAL and intellectual disability were required to identify 16 PCS presented thematically on a ‘bed-making’ communication overlay in response to a gloss read out by the researcher. The results indicated that, overall, the 16 PCS were relatively iconic to the participants. The results also indicated that the iconicity of PCS can be manipulated and enhanced and that it can be influenced by other PCS that are used simultaneously on the communication overlay. The reasons for these findings are described. The clinical and theoretical implications of this study’s results are discussed, followed by a critical evaluation of this study and, finally, recommendations for future research are suggested. / Dissertation (Master of Arts)--University of Pretoria, 2012. / Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (CAAC) / unrestricted
|
3 |
SLI or 'slow' to develop English additional language (EAL) learners - how do we know? : an in depth investigation of English additional language learners in the foundation phase with suspected specific language impairment.Rijhumal, Meera Surendar 06 October 2011 (has links)
Background: This study formed part of a larger longitudinal research study by Jordaan (2009), who tracked the development of language for academic purposes in grade 1- 3 English Additional Language (EAL) and English First Language (EFL) learners attending English only programmes in Gauteng over a period of three years. These learners attended schools in two different educational contexts where there is a marked heterogeneity in the linguistic backgrounds of both the learners and teachers investigated. Results from Jordaan’s (2009) study revealed that some EAL and EFL learners appeared to be slow in the development of their academic language abilities (as no progress was evident over the period of three years), relative to their peers, and thus these learners may have a language impairment.
Purpose: This study investigated in detail, these “slow to learn” EAL and EFL learners in the foundation phase, in order to determine whether they have a language impairment and to determine how the language impairment manifests in these learners.
Participants: Sixteen learners (5 EFL learners and 16 EAL learners) who demonstrated no improvement in their academic language abilities from grade one to grade two as determined by their performance on the Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation Criterion Referenced (DELV-CR) test were the participants of this study.
Method: The participants were assessed on the Automated Working Memory Assessment (AWMA) test, a Non Word Repetition test (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998), a Sentence Repetition test (Redmond, 2005) and the Gray Oral Reading Test (GORT-4). Educators were also asked to rate these learners’ oral language, written language and reading comprehension abilities on a scale of 0- 5. The research design utilized was a non experimental, descriptive quantitative design, involving both correlational and comparative components. The data obtained was then analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to establish whether there was a relationship between the cognitive processing and the language proficiency measures as well as the teacher ratings in order to provide information regarding these tests as assessment tools for EAL learners as well as to further enhance the validity of this study. Independent sample t-tests were also conducted to determine whether there were any significant differences between the EFL and EAL learners’ performance in the two different educational contexts, so as to establish whether bilingual learners with
language impairment are more severely impaired than monolingual learners with language
impairment.
Results: Based on the analysis of these learners’ performance on the DELV-CR test, results
indicated that all sixteen participants presented with SLI and were not just “slow to learn”. The
EAL-SLI learners in both contexts performed poorly on the reading comprehension test and were
rated lower than their aged matched peers on the teacher rating scales. Furthermore, when
comparing these EAL-SLI learners’ performance on the DELV-CR test to the performance of the
EFL-SLI learners, the EAL-SLI learners as a group appeared to have performed more poorly
than the EFL-SLI learners on all three subtests. As significant differences were found between
the EAL and EFL learners’ performance on the DELV-CR test, the results suggested that
bilingual learners with SLI, who acquire a second language sequentially, are more impaired than
monolingual learners with SLI. The EAL-SLI learners also presented with visuo-spatial short
term and working memory deficits and even though a large majority of the learners presented
with verbal short term and working memory difficulties, not all the learners presented with
cognitive processing difficulties. This finding has implications for the theories of SLI. However,
the sentence repetition task was found to be a useful tool in differentiating between the “slow to
learn” EAL learners and EAL-SLI learners and furthermore this test also positively correlated
with various sections of the DELV-CR test which adds to the value of this test as an assessment
tool in EAL learners. Positive correlations were also found between the teacher ratings of the
EAL-SLI learners and the subtests of the DELV-CR test which indicates that teachers have the
ability to correctly identify learners with language learning difficulties. Positive correlations
were also found between the digit repetition subtest, the non word repetition test and the sentence
repetition test which adds to the validity of this study.
Conclusion: The results obtained from this study demonstrated that bilingual learners with SLI
who acquire a second language sequentially are additionally disadvantaged compared to their
EFL-SLI peers in the acquisition of certain aspects of academic language. Furthermore, although
research has shown that cognitive processing measures are less biased in the assessment of
linguistically diverse learners, results indicated that the DELV-CR test identified more
accurately, learners with language impairment whereas the cognitive processing measures
provided contradictory and biased results with the verbal working memory subtest over
identifying learners “at risk” for language impairment. Finally, the use of sentence repetition
tasks in the differentiation between “slow to learn” and language impaired EAL learners proves to be promising.
|
4 |
Exploring first-year Students’ Voice and Subjectivity in Academic Writing at a University in South AfricaAmbe, Martina Bi January 2019 (has links)
Magister Educationis - MEd / Literacy development in South African higher education is increasingly challenged by several issues in dialogue and language of tuition. Despite the widening of access to South African universities, research shows that a large majority of entry-level university students are still failing in their chosen programme of studies. Almost all universities in the democratic South Africa incorporate academic development programs in first-year modules as an awareness raising attempt to scaffold novice students into the vocabulary of their various disciplines. However, these development programs sometimes fail to address the language needs of some of the students who have had more than seven years of schooling in their first languages (IsiXhosa and Afrikaans). My study seeks to explore how additional language IsiXhosa and Afrikaans students understand and construct written knowledge in one literacy development course using English medium of instruction. I further explore lecturers’ and tutors’ perspectives of the demand of sounding a scholarly voice in academic writing by entry-level students in their new roles as scholars in the University of the Western Cape (UWC).Literature indicated gaps when it comes to students’ and lectures’ perceptions on the construction of voice in academic writing in a language that the students are not comfortable in.
|
5 |
Profiling language in young urban English additional language learnersNaude, Elsie 03 November 2006 (has links)
The development of language and communication skills in young children is directly related to future academic success. Young children who are at risk for language impairment should, therefore, be identified as early as possible so that their language development may be optimised. Multilingualism, which has become a universal phenomenon, may mask the presence of language impairment if the pre-school teacher or speech-language therapist is not proficient in the young multilingual learner’s primary language. In some urban areas of South Africa, where many languages are represented in each pre-school classroom, it is likely that the teacher or therapist will lack proficiency in the primary language of quite a number of the pre-school learners. In these contexts, the language of mutual understanding is English and assessment of learners’ language behaviour will also be conducted in English. Against this background the aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of constructing a profile of typical English language behaviours for pre-school EAL learners in a circumscribed urban area. The profile is intended to provide speech-language therapists and pre-school teachers in collaborative practice with a dual-purpose tool: an instrument for identifying those learners who are at risk for language impairment/language learning disabilities, and a means of obtaining guidelines for the development of an appropriate programme for facilitating language development. The literature study reviewed the language diversity in South African pre-schools, and the role of speech-language therapists in these multilingual pre-schools. The aspects of language to be included in a profile of typical English language behaviours for young EAL learners were discussed. A quantitative descriptive research design was selected. The language database for 30 EAL pre-schoolers from a circumscribed geographical area was collected during 20 minutes of conversation between each pre-school participant and a trained speech-language therapist who acted as research fieldworker. The language data was analysed to identify typical language behaviours relating to language form, language content and language use. The results show that it was possible to construct a profile of typical English language behaviours for nine aspects of language form, one aspect of language content, and six aspects of language use. The information was used to construct two versions of a profile of typical English language behaviours, as well as a profile of risk indicators for language impairment in the specified group of EAL pre-schoolers. An action plan was designed to indicate the way in which these three profiles – the comprehensive profile, the essential classroom profile, and the profile of risk indicators – may be used by the collaborative team of speech-language therapist and pre-school teacher for language assessment, the identification of learners with language impairment, and the facilitation of language development for all EAL learners. / Thesis (DPhil (Communication Pathology))--University of Pretoria, 2007. / Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology / Unrestricted
|
Page generated in 0.0795 seconds