Includes bibliography. / MOTIVATION: The object of this investigation is to record and describe various sounds and sound structures conditioned by interlinguistic contact, as observed in the English speech of South African Bilinguals whose home language is Afrikaans. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS: In Section A the phenomenon of bilingualism is discussed with reference to the findings of leading investigators into the field of contrastive linguistics. Section B contains a brief contrastive analysis of phonetic and phonemic features of English and Afrikaans. The main body of Section C is devoted to an auditory analysis of reading and "free speech" tests. Renderings by Afrikaans-English Bilinguals are matched against renderings of a Norm. The object was to explore and analyse the impact of native Afrikaans linguistic prejudices upon the quality of vocoids in citation forms and in the continuum of speech. Furthermore, several perception tests were used to establish whether native Afrikaans linguistic habits inhibit the aural perception and the identification of English vocoids. Correlates between the aural and the perception tests are recorded. Trends observed in the rendering of vocoids in the speech of Afrikaans-English bilinguals are listed. Section D contains the spectrographic analysis of English structures uttered by A.-E. Bilinguals and by the Norm. The results are compared with trends observed in the auditory analysis in Section C. Section E contains a summary of methods and techniques in the teaching of English speech that follow upon the findings in Sections C and D. CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE: A comparative analysis of aspects of English and Afrikaans phonology on scientific principles constitutes some contribution to the body of knowledge of the discipline of contrastive linguistics. Furthermore, language teaching in South Africa lacks a firm basis of principle, the science of language pedagogy hardly exists. A scientific contrastive analysis of live speech offers an excellent basis for the preparation of instructional materials, and this investigation, therefore, should provide a significant contribution towards that end.

published_or_final_version / Linguistics / Master / Master of Arts

Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries

No description available.

Despite the fact that speech-language pathologists do not develop the theories underlying the principles and procedures used in the clinic, speech and language clinicians are ethically obliged to apply the "best" possible theory in their practice. Recently phonologists have been developing a theory of nonlinear phonology. Application of this theory to cross-linguistic data and to child language data has shown that what appeared to be idiosyncratic or difficult to account for using previous theoretical formulations can be neatly explained using a nonlinear phonological explanation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility of further extending the application of nonlinear phonological principles to the field of speech-language pathology. Two levels defined by the theory, segmental and prosodic, were investigated in a six-month-long intervention programme with a set of phonologically delayed twins (aged 5;6 at the outset of the project). Each twin was assigned to an experimental condition motivated by one of these levels, or tiers. In each condition, intervention goals were determined by parameters of the theory; the segmental condition contrasted features "higher" versus "lower" in the feature hierarchy, while the prosodic condition contrasted moraic with onset-rime descriptions of syllable/word shape. Using twins as subjects also allowed the twin aspect of language acquisition and speech-language intervention to be explored. Results of the phonological intervention study revealed that nonlinear phonology provides a viable framework for assessing and determining goals for phonological remediation. A comparison of progress in therapy indicated that one twin acquired therapy goals faster than the other. An investigation of the differential progress of the twins allowed conclusions to be drawn regarding social awareness and success in phonological therapy. / Medicine, Faculty of / Audiology and Speech Sciences, School of / Graduate

No description available.

published_or_final_version / Linguistics / Master / Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics

There is no abstract available for this thesis.

Two traditions have arisen from an ongoing debate concerning cross-linguistic laryngeal representations in series of obstruents. The first, ‘traditional’ approach assumes universally identical laryngeal representations: /p, t, k/ are unspecified and /b, d, g/ carry |voice|. The second, Laryngeal Realism (LR), assumes underlyingly different representations between languages: ‘aspiration languages’ have unspecified /b, d, g/, and /p, t, k/ specified for |spread|. ‘Voice languages’ have unspecified /p, t, k/, and /b, d, g/ specified for |voice|. In this thesis, I use historical data in order to determine which of these two traditions is correct. Chapter 1 introduces the thesis subject and places it in the broader context of representational models of theoretical phonology and general historical linguistics. In chapter 2, I discuss the discrepancy between traditional laryngeal features and their cross-linguistic implementation, the basis of the debate outlined above. The two traditions are then discussed in detail. It is shown that evidence for LR is drawn from surface facts in aspiration- and voice languages such as respective presence or absence of aspiration of /p, t, k/, respective absence or presence of voicing in /b, d, g/ and asymmetry in assimilation processes in favour of one of the features. Present-Day English (PDE) is best described in LR when these criteria are taken into account, e.g., [ph]in, [b 0]in, and invariable assimilation to ‘voicelessness’, e.g., cats /t+z/→[ts], sacked /k+d/→[kt]. In the following chapters, I present data from historical laryngeal modifications in English which have never been considered together in this respect before. In Chapter 3, I present new evidence that the laryngeal situation just described for Present-Day English dates back to the very beginning of its recorded history. This is shown in the fact that all laryngeal assimilation throughout the history of English is exclusively assimilation to ‘voicelessness’ or |spread| - as in pre-Old English [pd] > [pt] cepte ‘kept’, [td] > [tt] mette ‘met’, [kd] > [kt] iecte ‘increased’, [fd] > [ft] pyfte ‘puffed’, [sd] > [st] cyste ‘kissed’. LR can easily capture this asymmetry because |spread| is the only active member in the laryngeal opposition. |voice| is unspecified in English and can therefore never partake in phonological processes. Chapters 4, 5 and 6 deal with historical English data traditionally interpreted as ‘voicings’, i.e. addition of |voice|, and ‘devoicings’, i.e. loss of |voice|. Therefore, these data are potentially problematic for LR in that, according to this framework, |voice| is not specified in English. However, I show that LR can unproblematically deal with these phenomena as laryngeal lenition, removal of |spread|, and fortition, addition of |spread|. In fact, some of the lenition processes provide extra back up for LR. Processes in word-initial position, e.g., dialectal [v]ather, and final position, e.g., i[z], knowle[d3], are highly marked when viewed as ‘voicings’. However, when viewed as simple lenitions, as in LR, they are natural processes, which are predicted to be found in languages. Therefore, I show in this thesis that all available data from English historical laryngeal modification support LR, and that LR in its turn sheds an interesting new light on the data. It is superior to traditional accounts in that it can account for otherwise puzzling phenomena such as asymmetric assimilation and initial and final ‘voicings’.

No description available.