Spelling suggestions: "subject:"ethics direction for civil servants"" "subject:"ethics direction for civil cervants""
1 |
政策利害關係人對廉政政策順服與政治信任感關聯性之研究-以環保署業務往來之廠商為例 / Policy stakeholder’s policy compliance and political trust: a case study of the environmental protection administration in Taiwan楊華興 Unknown Date (has links)
本研究以Easton政治支持理論架構,探討不同人口背景與政治態度的政策利害關係人之政策順服影響因素,並就政策執行監測觀點,將順服變數,分從政策認知、政策環境、執行成效滿意度、利害關係人之行為配合度等面向加以剖析,再檢視不同個人對政策順服的差異與其政治信任感有無關連,以獲得理論上驗證。
廉政政策的執行評估或評價,廠商較一般民眾認知更為成熟,對「廉政倫理規範」相關事務的理解能力相對熟悉,故選擇以廠商(即本文政策利害關係人)為研究對象。依照首揭研究目的,假設「認知」與「環境壓力」兩個因素為影響個人對於廉政政策滿意度與行為傾向的主要因素,即個人對於廉政政策所持為正向認知,其所處政策環境會迫使自己遵守廉政政策規範,有助於廉政政策滿意度的提升與行為上的順服。反之,個人對於廉政政策所持為負向認知,且所處政策環境會促使自己規避廉政政策規範者,將使個人不滿意現行政策施行的效果,致滿意度降低與行為上的不順服。
研究結果發現,政策利害關係人的政黨認同對廉政政策順服有影響,其原因可能由於個人的背景不同,使得生活經驗就有所不同,所以形塑每個人的政策認知深度、支持態度、政策滿意度及行動參與意向等表現不同,因此使政策利害關係人在「廉政政策順服」量表的表現強弱也有所差異。此外,在政治信任感方面,與以往的研究結果對照,可以發現政治信任感也是呈現低度水準,並與性別、教育程度、業務類別、政黨認同、所得收入等變項顯著相關。若從廉政政策順服與政治信任感之關聯性探討,發現廉政政策順服與政治信任感呈顯著相關,其中廉政政策順服構面之「環境壓力」、「滿意度」、「行為傾向」等變項的相關程度較高。
最後,本文探求廉政政策執行及成效評估等有關廉政政策推動策略的建議,期能提供作為政策執行的重要參考。
關鍵字:政策利害關係人、政策順服、政策執行、政治信任感、廉政倫理規範 / Based on David Easton's framework of political-system support theory, this study discussed the factors that influence policy compliance of policy stakeholders with different background and political attitudes. From the point of view of policy monitoring , it analyzed the variables affecting compliance from the aspects of policy cognition, policy environment, satisfaction of implementation effectiveness, and cooperation degree of policy stakeholders. Furthermore, it examined the correlations between policy compliance and political trust of each individual in order to get the verification of theory.
When it comes to the evaluation and appraisal of the implementation of the anticorruption policy, vendors are ,compared to the general public, more familiar to the affairs concerning Ethics Direction for Civil Servants. This study has selected vendors (i.e. the policy stakeholders) as the research objects. According to the study goal, the "cognition" and the "environmental pressure" were assumed to be two main factors affecting individual satisfaction and behavioral orientation toward the anticorruption policy. When an individual holds a positive cognition toward the anticorruption policy, the policy environment will force the individual to comply with the policy. The satisfaction toward the policy and the behavioral compliance will be fostered. On the contrary, if an individual holds a negative cognition toward the policy, and the policy environment will discourage the individual to comply with the provisions of the anticorruption policy. The individual will not satisfy with the implementing results of the current policy. It will impede the satisfaction and lower the behavioral compliance.
The study found that the party identification of the policy stakeholders would influence their compliance to the anticorruption policy. The reason might be that different backgrounds make different life experiences. This molds individual into different level of policy cognition, attitude of support, policy satisfaction and participation orientation, and in turn makes different representation on scale of compliance of the anticorruption policy. In addition, the political trust, when compared to previous studies, was found to be at a low level, and significantly related to gender, education level, job category, party identification and income level. When exploring from the correlation between the anticorruption policy and the political trust, the study found a significant correlation between them. Among variables of anticorruption policy dimension, "environmental pressure," "degree of satisfaction" and "behavioral orientation" have high levels of correlation with political trust.
Lastly, this study has explored suggestions to the implementation and evaluation of strategies related to the promotion of anticorruption policy in hope to serve as an important reference to the policy implementation.
Key word:policy stakeholder, policy compliance, policy implementation, Political Trust, Ethics Direction for Civil Servants
|
Page generated in 0.1067 seconds