Directional selection is prevalent in nature yet phenotypes tend to remain relatively constant, suggesting a limit to trait evolution. The genetic basis of evolutionary limits in unmanipulated populations, however, is generally not known. Given widespread pleiotropy, opposing selection on a focal trait may arise from the effects of the underlying alleles on other fitness components, generating net stabilizing selection on trait genetic variance and thus limiting evolution. Here, I look for the signature of stabilizing selection for a suite of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) in Drosophila serrata. Despite strong directional sexual selection on CHCs, genetic variance differed between high and low fitness individuals and was greater among the low fitness males for seven of eight CHCs. Univariate tests of a difference in genetic variance were non-significant but have low power. My results implicate stabilizing selection, arising through pleiotropy, in generating a genetic limit to the evolution of CHCs in this species.

Directional selection is prevalent in nature yet phenotypes tend to remain relatively constant, suggesting a limit to trait evolution. The genetic basis of evolutionary limits in unmanipulated populations, however, is generally not known. Given widespread pleiotropy, opposing selection on a focal trait may arise from the effects of the underlying alleles on other fitness components, generating net stabilizing selection on trait genetic variance and thus limiting evolution. Here, I look for the signature of stabilizing selection for a suite of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) in Drosophila serrata. Despite strong directional sexual selection on CHCs, genetic variance differed between high and low fitness individuals and was greater among the low fitness males for seven of eight CHCs. Univariate tests of a difference in genetic variance were non-significant but have low power. My results implicate stabilizing selection, arising through pleiotropy, in generating a genetic limit to the evolution of CHCs in this species.

Directional selection is prevalent in nature yet phenotypes tend to remain relatively constant, suggesting a limit to trait evolution. The genetic basis of evolutionary limits in unmanipulated populations, however, is generally not known. Given widespread pleiotropy, opposing selection on a focal trait may arise from the effects of the underlying alleles on other fitness components, generating net stabilizing selection on trait genetic variance and thus limiting evolution. Here, I look for the signature of stabilizing selection for a suite of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) in Drosophila serrata. Despite strong directional sexual selection on CHCs, genetic variance differed between high and low fitness individuals and was greater among the low fitness males for seven of eight CHCs. Univariate tests of a difference in genetic variance were non-significant but have low power. My results implicate stabilizing selection, arising through pleiotropy, in generating a genetic limit to the evolution of CHCs in this species.

Directional selection is prevalent in nature yet phenotypes tend to remain relatively constant, suggesting a limit to trait evolution. The genetic basis of evolutionary limits in unmanipulated populations, however, is generally not known. Given widespread pleiotropy, opposing selection on a focal trait may arise from the effects of the underlying alleles on other fitness components, generating net stabilizing selection on trait genetic variance and thus limiting evolution. Here, I look for the signature of stabilizing selection for a suite of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) in Drosophila serrata. Despite strong directional sexual selection on CHCs, genetic variance differed between high and low fitness individuals and was greater among the low fitness males for seven of eight CHCs. Univariate tests of a difference in genetic variance were non-significant but have low power. My results implicate stabilizing selection, arising through pleiotropy, in generating a genetic limit to the evolution of CHCs in this species.

The ultimate goal of my thesis is to develop a better understanding of the contribution of indirect benefits (i.e. good genes) to the evolution of female mate preferences. It is genetic variance in, and genetic correlations (covariances) among, male sexual displays, female preferences for them, and fitness that in part determine the degree to which females preferring certain male displays over others will gain an indirect benefit by having higher fitness offspring. Recent advances in quantitative genetic theory provide the mathematical means for quantifying the strength of indirect selection for female mate preferences (Kirkpatrick and Hall 2004), at least under certain conditions, but there are few empirical systems for which such data exist (Brooks and Endler 2001; Qvarnström et al. 2006). I have undertaken a classic half-sibling breeding design with the ultimate goal of estimating the specific parameters of this model in a population of the Australian fruit fly Drosophila serrata. The breeding design was performed across two environments - one to which the population was well adapted and a novel environment to which it was not - thereby also providing insight into genotype-by-environment interactions for this suite of traits and their effects on good genes indirect benefits in a novel environment. General insight is also gained into the genetic covariance of male and female fitness and the prevalence of intralocus sexual conflict, the quantitative genetic basis of female mate preferences for multiple male traits, the condition-dependence of these traits, and the genetic association between sexual displays and fitness when mutation-selection balance is inferred. My results advocate caution in the application of existing theory to quantify the strength of indirect selection, suggesting that a good genes process may be fundamentally different when the exaggeration of sexual displays is eventually halted and an equilibrium is reached between opposing selection.

The ultimate goal of my thesis is to develop a better understanding of the contribution of indirect benefits (i.e. good genes) to the evolution of female mate preferences. It is genetic variance in, and genetic correlations (covariances) among, male sexual displays, female preferences for them, and fitness that in part determine the degree to which females preferring certain male displays over others will gain an indirect benefit by having higher fitness offspring. Recent advances in quantitative genetic theory provide the mathematical means for quantifying the strength of indirect selection for female mate preferences (Kirkpatrick and Hall 2004), at least under certain conditions, but there are few empirical systems for which such data exist (Brooks and Endler 2001; Qvarnström et al. 2006). I have undertaken a classic half-sibling breeding design with the ultimate goal of estimating the specific parameters of this model in a population of the Australian fruit fly Drosophila serrata. The breeding design was performed across two environments - one to which the population was well adapted and a novel environment to which it was not - thereby also providing insight into genotype-by-environment interactions for this suite of traits and their effects on good genes indirect benefits in a novel environment. General insight is also gained into the genetic covariance of male and female fitness and the prevalence of intralocus sexual conflict, the quantitative genetic basis of female mate preferences for multiple male traits, the condition-dependence of these traits, and the genetic association between sexual displays and fitness when mutation-selection balance is inferred. My results advocate caution in the application of existing theory to quantify the strength of indirect selection, suggesting that a good genes process may be fundamentally different when the exaggeration of sexual displays is eventually halted and an equilibrium is reached between opposing selection.

The ultimate goal of my thesis is to develop a better understanding of the contribution of indirect benefits (i.e. good genes) to the evolution of female mate preferences. It is genetic variance in, and genetic correlations (covariances) among, male sexual displays, female preferences for them, and fitness that in part determine the degree to which females preferring certain male displays over others will gain an indirect benefit by having higher fitness offspring. Recent advances in quantitative genetic theory provide the mathematical means for quantifying the strength of indirect selection for female mate preferences (Kirkpatrick and Hall 2004), at least under certain conditions, but there are few empirical systems for which such data exist (Brooks and Endler 2001; Qvarnström et al. 2006). I have undertaken a classic half-sibling breeding design with the ultimate goal of estimating the specific parameters of this model in a population of the Australian fruit fly Drosophila serrata. The breeding design was performed across two environments - one to which the population was well adapted and a novel environment to which it was not - thereby also providing insight into genotype-by-environment interactions for this suite of traits and their effects on good genes indirect benefits in a novel environment. General insight is also gained into the genetic covariance of male and female fitness and the prevalence of intralocus sexual conflict, the quantitative genetic basis of female mate preferences for multiple male traits, the condition-dependence of these traits, and the genetic association between sexual displays and fitness when mutation-selection balance is inferred. My results advocate caution in the application of existing theory to quantify the strength of indirect selection, suggesting that a good genes process may be fundamentally different when the exaggeration of sexual displays is eventually halted and an equilibrium is reached between opposing selection.

The ultimate goal of my thesis is to develop a better understanding of the contribution of indirect benefits (i.e. good genes) to the evolution of female mate preferences. It is genetic variance in, and genetic correlations (covariances) among, male sexual displays, female preferences for them, and fitness that in part determine the degree to which females preferring certain male displays over others will gain an indirect benefit by having higher fitness offspring. Recent advances in quantitative genetic theory provide the mathematical means for quantifying the strength of indirect selection for female mate preferences (Kirkpatrick and Hall 2004), at least under certain conditions, but there are few empirical systems for which such data exist (Brooks and Endler 2001; Qvarnström et al. 2006). I have undertaken a classic half-sibling breeding design with the ultimate goal of estimating the specific parameters of this model in a population of the Australian fruit fly Drosophila serrata. The breeding design was performed across two environments - one to which the population was well adapted and a novel environment to which it was not - thereby also providing insight into genotype-by-environment interactions for this suite of traits and their effects on good genes indirect benefits in a novel environment. General insight is also gained into the genetic covariance of male and female fitness and the prevalence of intralocus sexual conflict, the quantitative genetic basis of female mate preferences for multiple male traits, the condition-dependence of these traits, and the genetic association between sexual displays and fitness when mutation-selection balance is inferred. My results advocate caution in the application of existing theory to quantify the strength of indirect selection, suggesting that a good genes process may be fundamentally different when the exaggeration of sexual displays is eventually halted and an equilibrium is reached between opposing selection.