BACKGROUND: Many different ocular diseases produce a common symptom of macular edema - a leakage of fluid into the retina. In addition to the presence of this structural aberration, functionally, the retina’s capacity to effectively conduct electrochemical signals will be impaired. The impediment can be demonstrated by a decreased electrical response measured via electroretinography (ERG) and visualized as a waveform with quantifiable amplitude. Macular edema and its associated effects on retinal structure and function are resultant of abnormal blood vessel growth, or angiogenesis. The process of angiogenesis involves a pathway of multiple growth factors and signaling molecules, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Modern day treatments to help resolve macular edema target VEGF in order to inhibit pathological angiogenesis; two such anti-VEGF medications are aflibercept, or Eylea, and bevacizumab, also known as Avastin. This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the outcomes of patients treated with either Avastin or Eylea, and to observe what structural or functional changes occur in each sample. METHODS: This study included twelve eyes of 8 eligible patients that were injected with intravitreal Avastin for diabetic macular edema (DME), clinically significant macular edema (CSME), proliferative diabetic retinopathy, or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and had resolved macular edema. Five eyes of 6 eligible patients that were injected with intravitreal Eylea for NPDR, neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), cystoid macular edema (CME), central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), or DME, and had resolved edema were also included in the study. Patient data was randomly screened and collected via the MDIntelleSys (MDI) electronic medical record system at Fromer Eye Centers, New York. No personally identifiable information was collected in this study. The parameters used for comparison of the two anti-VEGF medications were the length of treatment, frequency of injection, change in ERG magnitude between subsequent scans, and net change in ERG magnitude between the baseline scan and the most recent scan obtained during the period of the study. The means of each parameter were determined to be the best measure of central tendency to summarize the data. Welch’s t-tests were conducted at a significance level of α= 0.05 between the parameters of each group to determine the significance of the differences in the means obtained. RESULTS: There was no significant difference found between the mean number of injections, time until recovery, change in magnitude, and net change in magnitude for both Avastin-treated patients and those treated with Eylea. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the conclusion that both aflibercept and bevacizumab are comparably effective anti-VEGF treatments, in both relieving macular edema and restoring function in retinal cells. The similar outcomes observed in each treatment group offer insight into the versatility of anti-VEGF treatment and provide physicians with the flexibility of pursuing alternative medication options for their patients. Further study into the structural and functional effects of various anti-VEGF medications is needed to account for variables such as age, sex, race, or other possibly confounding factors. An inclusion of other quantifiable data such as visual acuity would also benefit this investigation. Furthermore, this study is limited by its focus solely on anti-VEGF medication; this subject of discussion would benefit from an experimental comparison between anti-VEGF treatments and other allopathic interventions. Recent studies have suggested alternatives to anti-VEGF altogether such as intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and intravitreal steroids like dexamethasone, marketed as Ozurdex.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of blindness in the United States in people who are 50 and older. The safety and efficacy of aflibercept for the treatment of late stage neovascular AMD (NAMD) has been demonstrated by clinical trials among several populations; however, it is unclear whether all NAMD patients respond in the same manner as was studied in the clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to examine if populations of patients treated with aflibercept for the treatment of NAMD were significantly different from one another in terms of health characteristics, treatment regimens, and treatment outcomes. The burden of treatment theory was used to guide this study. Data collected from electronic medical records were used to investigate NAMD characteristics 199 patients from 3 private, retinal practices in the United States. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, 2, Spearman's correlation, and point-biserial correlation tests. The results of this study showed the specific retinal practice populations of NAMD patients treated with aflibercept were generally similar with respect to selected health characteristics, treatment regimens, and treatment outcomes. By using the information reported from this research, public health initiatives can be developed that focus on the need for early detection of AMD to capture changes that represent NAMD and move to early treatment for better outcomes. The positive social change that could result from this research is that retinal specialists may gain insight into the use and outcomes of aflibercept treatment.