M.Tech. / Purpose: The cervical facet joints have attracted relatively little attention as possible sources of neck pain and referred pain. Multiple authors have described the management of cervical facet joint pain but not the cause (Manchikanti et al., 2002). Method: This study consisted of one group of 100 participants. The participants were between the ages of 18 and 40 years. Potential participants were examined and accepted based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All the participants received a cervical spine adjustment. Objective and subjective readings were taken. Procedure: The participants were seen only once. The Visual Analogue Scale was completed by each participant before treatment. Algometer readings were taken over the most restricted cervical spine facet joint and cervical spine range of motion (CROM) machine readings were taken measuring the ranges of motion of the cervical spine. The participants received an adjustment to the most restricted cervical spine facet joint as determined by motion palpation. The CROM machine and algometer readings were taken again immediately after the adjustment and the algometer readings were taken again 10 minutes later. Results: In terms of subjective measurements based on the Visual Analogue Scale, all participants experienced clinically significant pain before starting the trial.In terms of objective measurements based on algometer readings, a clinically significant difference was found as the pressure pain threshold increases over a period of time. In terms of the CROM machine readings there was a clinical improvement from the pretreatment ranges of motion to the post-treatment ranges of motion. The algometer and CROM readings were statistically incomparable to begin with. Conclusion: The results proved that there was a statistical significant noted immediately after the adjustment and 10 minutes later, however, this does not mean much as thegroups were not comparable to begin with. A statistically significant difference was noted for all ranges of cervical spine motion (flexion, extension, right and left lateral flexion and rotation), thus showing that the cervical spine adjustment was successfully delivered to the restricted segments.

A lombalgia e a cervicalgia possui grande incidência em toda a população mundial. Segundo a Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS), em média, cerca de 80% da população adulta apresenta, em algum momento da vida, pelo menos uma queixa de dor na coluna, onde a degeneração da articulação do processo articular é frequentemente apontada como a etiologia. Diversos estudos vêm sendo realizados, na tentativa de se compreender como ocorre o processo degenerativo patológico dessas articulações, onde, frequentemente são usados indivíduos sintomáticos. Deste modo, avaliou-se, com o uso de técnicas macroscópicas, de microscopia de luz e de microscopia eletrônica, a organização estrutural da cartilagem dos processos articulares (CPas) das vértebras cervicais (C) e lombares (L) de indivíduos jovens (GJ) e idosos (GI), presumivelmente assintomáticos. Foram utilizados blocos vertebrais obtidos de cadáveres necropsiados no Serviço de Verificação de Óbitos da Capital do Estado de São Paulo, onde familiares de todos os indivíduos forneceram informações que permitiram incluir ou excluí-los da pesquisa. Os resultados mostram que ocorrem alterações na superfície da CPa do segmento L no GJ. A degeneração da CPa ocorre de forma heterogênea entre os indivíduos do GI e as característica do grau 2 podem ser admitidas como decorrentes do processo de envelhecimento normal, não havendo diferenças entre os segmentos C e L. / Back pain and neck pain have a high occurrence in populations worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 80% of adults have at some instance in life pain in the spine with an etiology frequently indicated to be the degeneration of the articular process. Several studies have been undertaken to understand how the pathological degenerative process occurs and symptomatic subjects are frequently used for this end. Macroscopic and light and electron microscopy techniques have been employed to assess the structural organization of the cartilage of the articulation processes (CAP) of the cervical (C) and lumbar (L) vertebrae of presumably asymptomatic young (Y) and elderly (E) people. Samples, retrieved from routinely necropsied corpses by the Death Verification Service of the Capital City of the State of São Paulo (SVOC/SP) and the family of all individuals provided information that enabled include or exclude them from search. Results show that changes in the CAP surface of segment L of Y occur. CAP degradation occurs heterogeneously among elderly people, whereas second degree characteristics are caused by normal aging without any difference between the C and L segments.

Low back pain has a significant impact on global public health and economics. The bright facet sign (BFS), a common finding on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine, is associated with low back pain. While degenerative joint disease (DJD) affects low back pain, its presence appears independent of the BFS at the disc and facet joints at the same spinal level. Increased BMI, considered a risk factor for DJD, has an inverse association with the BFS. The independent relationship of DJD and the BFS is poorly understood and may represent a previously unreported pain pathway. In this nested case-control quantitative study, based on an accepted conceptual framework, 350 lumbar MRI studies on symptomatic patients with historic and anthropomorphic data related to low back pain were analyzed using Spearman's Rho and Multivariate Logistic Regression to examine any associations between the BFS at 3 spinal levels and the independent variables age, race/ethnicity, physical activity, BMI, trauma, low back pain, and DJD. The findings revealed significant associations between the BFS and the duration of pain, age, and gender at 1 or more spinal levels, the BFS and BMI and degenerative facet disease (DFD) at all 3 spinal levels, and no association between the BFS and degenerative disc disease (DDD). These results, contrary to current medical constructs where BMI, DFD, and DDD are considered predictive of low back pain, facilitate an improved understanding of joint function and contribute to the current body of knowledge related to low back pain. An understanding of the BFS as it relates to DJD and low back pain will assist clinicians with the early detection of spinal degeneration and the mitigation of pain and suffering, contributing to positive social change.

A lombalgia e a cervicalgia possui grande incidência em toda a população mundial. Segundo a Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS), em média, cerca de 80% da população adulta apresenta, em algum momento da vida, pelo menos uma queixa de dor na coluna, onde a degeneração da articulação do processo articular é frequentemente apontada como a etiologia. Diversos estudos vêm sendo realizados, na tentativa de se compreender como ocorre o processo degenerativo patológico dessas articulações, onde, frequentemente são usados indivíduos sintomáticos. Deste modo, avaliou-se, com o uso de técnicas macroscópicas, de microscopia de luz e de microscopia eletrônica, a organização estrutural da cartilagem dos processos articulares (CPas) das vértebras cervicais (C) e lombares (L) de indivíduos jovens (GJ) e idosos (GI), presumivelmente assintomáticos. Foram utilizados blocos vertebrais obtidos de cadáveres necropsiados no Serviço de Verificação de Óbitos da Capital do Estado de São Paulo, onde familiares de todos os indivíduos forneceram informações que permitiram incluir ou excluí-los da pesquisa. Os resultados mostram que ocorrem alterações na superfície da CPa do segmento L no GJ. A degeneração da CPa ocorre de forma heterogênea entre os indivíduos do GI e as característica do grau 2 podem ser admitidas como decorrentes do processo de envelhecimento normal, não havendo diferenças entre os segmentos C e L. / Back pain and neck pain have a high occurrence in populations worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 80% of adults have at some instance in life pain in the spine with an etiology frequently indicated to be the degeneration of the articular process. Several studies have been undertaken to understand how the pathological degenerative process occurs and symptomatic subjects are frequently used for this end. Macroscopic and light and electron microscopy techniques have been employed to assess the structural organization of the cartilage of the articulation processes (CAP) of the cervical (C) and lumbar (L) vertebrae of presumably asymptomatic young (Y) and elderly (E) people. Samples, retrieved from routinely necropsied corpses by the Death Verification Service of the Capital City of the State of São Paulo (SVOC/SP) and the family of all individuals provided information that enabled include or exclude them from search. Results show that changes in the CAP surface of segment L of Y occur. CAP degradation occurs heterogeneously among elderly people, whereas second degree characteristics are caused by normal aging without any difference between the C and L segments.

No description available.

There are several reasons to research the effects of axial twist exposures and the resulting loading on the spine. The lack of consensus from the limited work that has previously examined the role of axial twist moments and motions in the development of spine injuries or generation of low back pain is the primary reason. From recently published works, axial twist moments appear to represent an increased risk for injury development when it acts in concert with loading about other physiological axes (i.e. flexion, extension, and compression). However, there is a large body of epidemiologic data identifying axial twist moments and/or motion as risk factors for low back disorders and pain, demonstrating the need for this series of investigations. It is likely that these combined exposures increase risk through altering the spine’s load distribution (passive resistance) by modifying the mechanics, but this deduction and related causal mechanism need to be researched. The global objective of this research was focused on determining whether there is evidence to support altered load distribution in the spine, specifically between the intervertebral disc and facets, in response to applied axial twist moments (when added in combination with one and two axes of additional loading). Also included was whether these modes of loading can modify spine mechanics and contribute and/or alter the development of damage and pain. This objective was addressed through one in-vivo (Drake and Callaghan, 2008a– Chapter #2) and three in-vitro (Drake et al., 2008– Chapter #4; Drake and Callaghan, 2008b– Chapter #5; Drake and Callaghan, 2008c– Chapter #6) studies that: (1) Quantified the amount of passive twist motion in the lumbar spine when coupled with various flexion-extension postures; (2) Documented the effects of flexion-extension postures and loading history on the distance between the facet articular surfaces; (3) Evaluated the result of axial twist rotation rates on acute failure of the spine in a neutral flexion posture; and (4) Explored whether repetitive combined loading has the ability to cause enough deformation to the spine to generate pain. Through the combination of findings previously reported in the literature and the outcomes of Drake and Callaghan (2008a– Chapter #2) and Drake et al. (2008– Chapter #4), a postural mediated mechanism was hypothesized to be responsible for governing the load distribution between the facet joints and other structures of the spine (i.e. disc, ligaments). Increased flexed postures were found to decrease the rotational stiffness by resulting in larger twist angles for the same applied twist moment in-vivo relative to a neutral flexion posture (Drake and Callaghan, 2008a– Chapter #2). This suggested there might be an increased load on the disc due to a change in facet coupling in these combined postures. Similarly, increased angles were observed in flexed and twisted postures for in-vitro specimens relative to a neutral flexion posture. These observed differences were found to correspond with altered facet joint mechanics. Specifically that flexed twisted postures increased the inter-facet spacing relative to the initial state of facet articulation (Drake et al., 2008– Chapter #4). These finding supported the postulated postural mechanism. Therefore, in a neutral posture the facet joints likely resisted the majority of any applied twist moment based on the limited range of motion and higher axial rotational stiffness responses observed. It was suspected that the changes in mechanics would likely cause a change in the load distribution however the magnitude of change in load distribution remains to be quantified. Further support for this postulated postural mechanism comes from the mode of failure for specimens that were exposed to 10,000 cycles of 5° axial twist rotation while in a static flexed posture (Drake and Callaghan, 2008c– Chapter #6), and neutrally flexed specimens exposed to 1.5° of rotation for 10,000 cycles reported in the literature. Without flexion, the failure patterns were reported to occur in the endplates, facets, laminae and capsular ligaments, but not the disc. However, with flexion the repetitive axial twist rotational displacements caused damage primarily to the disc. If the load distribution was unchanged, the higher axial rotation angle should have caused the specimen to fail in less cycles of loading, and the failure pattern should not have changed. Modulators of this hypothesized mechanism include the velocity of the applied twist moment and the effects these have on the failure parameters and injury outcomes. The three physiologic loading rates investigated in this work were not shown to affect the ultimate axial twist rotational failure angle or moment in a neutral flexion/extension posture, but were shown to modify flexion-extension stiffness (Drake and Callaghan, 2008b– Chapter #5). All of the flexion-extension stiffness values post failure, from a one-time axial twist exposure, was less than those from a repetitive combined loading exposure that has been established to damage the intervertebral disc but not the facets. Therefore, it is likely that the facet joint provides the primary resistance to acute axial twist moments when the spine is in a neutral flexion posture, but there appears to be a redistribution of the applied load from the facets to the disc in repetitive exposures. The aforementioned studies determined there are changes in load distribution and load response caused by altered mechanics resulting from twist loading, but whether the exposures could possibly produce pain needed to be addressed. Previous research has determined that the disc has relatively low innervation in comparison to the richly innervated facet capsule and vertebra, with only the outer regions being innervated. Likewise, it is assumed that pain could be directly generated as the nucleus pulposus disrupted the innervated outer annular fibres in the process of herniation. Also, direct compression of the spinal cord or nerve roots has been shown to occur from the extruded nucleus and result in the generation of pain responses. Additionally, the nucleus pulposus has been shown to be a noxious stimulus that damages the function and structure of nerves on contact. The other source of nerve root compression commonly recognized is a decrease in intervertebral foramina space, which was previously believed to only be caused through losses in disc height. However, decreased intervertebral foramina space due to repetitive motions appears to be a viable pain generating pathway that may not directly correspond to simply a loss of specimen or disc height (Drake and Callaghan, 2008c– Chapter #6). This is new evidence for combined loading to generate pain through spinal deformation. The objective of many traditional treatments for nerve root compression focus on restoring lost disc height to remove the nerve root compression. Unfortunately, nerve root compression caused by repetitive loading may not be alleviated through this approach. This collection of studies was focused on determining whether altered load distribution in the spine, specifically between the intervertebral disc and facets, in response to applied axial twist loading (when added in combination with one and two axes of additional loading) was occurring, and examining how these modes of loading can contribute and/or alter the development of injury and pain. Therefore, findings generated from this thesis may have important implications for clinicians, researchers, and ergonomists.

There are several reasons to research the effects of axial twist exposures and the resulting loading on the spine. The lack of consensus from the limited work that has previously examined the role of axial twist moments and motions in the development of spine injuries or generation of low back pain is the primary reason. From recently published works, axial twist moments appear to represent an increased risk for injury development when it acts in concert with loading about other physiological axes (i.e. flexion, extension, and compression). However, there is a large body of epidemiologic data identifying axial twist moments and/or motion as risk factors for low back disorders and pain, demonstrating the need for this series of investigations. It is likely that these combined exposures increase risk through altering the spine’s load distribution (passive resistance) by modifying the mechanics, but this deduction and related causal mechanism need to be researched. The global objective of this research was focused on determining whether there is evidence to support altered load distribution in the spine, specifically between the intervertebral disc and facets, in response to applied axial twist moments (when added in combination with one and two axes of additional loading). Also included was whether these modes of loading can modify spine mechanics and contribute and/or alter the development of damage and pain. This objective was addressed through one in-vivo (Drake and Callaghan, 2008a– Chapter #2) and three in-vitro (Drake et al., 2008– Chapter #4; Drake and Callaghan, 2008b– Chapter #5; Drake and Callaghan, 2008c– Chapter #6) studies that: (1) Quantified the amount of passive twist motion in the lumbar spine when coupled with various flexion-extension postures; (2) Documented the effects of flexion-extension postures and loading history on the distance between the facet articular surfaces; (3) Evaluated the result of axial twist rotation rates on acute failure of the spine in a neutral flexion posture; and (4) Explored whether repetitive combined loading has the ability to cause enough deformation to the spine to generate pain. Through the combination of findings previously reported in the literature and the outcomes of Drake and Callaghan (2008a– Chapter #2) and Drake et al. (2008– Chapter #4), a postural mediated mechanism was hypothesized to be responsible for governing the load distribution between the facet joints and other structures of the spine (i.e. disc, ligaments). Increased flexed postures were found to decrease the rotational stiffness by resulting in larger twist angles for the same applied twist moment in-vivo relative to a neutral flexion posture (Drake and Callaghan, 2008a– Chapter #2). This suggested there might be an increased load on the disc due to a change in facet coupling in these combined postures. Similarly, increased angles were observed in flexed and twisted postures for in-vitro specimens relative to a neutral flexion posture. These observed differences were found to correspond with altered facet joint mechanics. Specifically that flexed twisted postures increased the inter-facet spacing relative to the initial state of facet articulation (Drake et al., 2008– Chapter #4). These finding supported the postulated postural mechanism. Therefore, in a neutral posture the facet joints likely resisted the majority of any applied twist moment based on the limited range of motion and higher axial rotational stiffness responses observed. It was suspected that the changes in mechanics would likely cause a change in the load distribution however the magnitude of change in load distribution remains to be quantified. Further support for this postulated postural mechanism comes from the mode of failure for specimens that were exposed to 10,000 cycles of 5° axial twist rotation while in a static flexed posture (Drake and Callaghan, 2008c– Chapter #6), and neutrally flexed specimens exposed to 1.5° of rotation for 10,000 cycles reported in the literature. Without flexion, the failure patterns were reported to occur in the endplates, facets, laminae and capsular ligaments, but not the disc. However, with flexion the repetitive axial twist rotational displacements caused damage primarily to the disc. If the load distribution was unchanged, the higher axial rotation angle should have caused the specimen to fail in less cycles of loading, and the failure pattern should not have changed. Modulators of this hypothesized mechanism include the velocity of the applied twist moment and the effects these have on the failure parameters and injury outcomes. The three physiologic loading rates investigated in this work were not shown to affect the ultimate axial twist rotational failure angle or moment in a neutral flexion/extension posture, but were shown to modify flexion-extension stiffness (Drake and Callaghan, 2008b– Chapter #5). All of the flexion-extension stiffness values post failure, from a one-time axial twist exposure, was less than those from a repetitive combined loading exposure that has been established to damage the intervertebral disc but not the facets. Therefore, it is likely that the facet joint provides the primary resistance to acute axial twist moments when the spine is in a neutral flexion posture, but there appears to be a redistribution of the applied load from the facets to the disc in repetitive exposures. The aforementioned studies determined there are changes in load distribution and load response caused by altered mechanics resulting from twist loading, but whether the exposures could possibly produce pain needed to be addressed. Previous research has determined that the disc has relatively low innervation in comparison to the richly innervated facet capsule and vertebra, with only the outer regions being innervated. Likewise, it is assumed that pain could be directly generated as the nucleus pulposus disrupted the innervated outer annular fibres in the process of herniation. Also, direct compression of the spinal cord or nerve roots has been shown to occur from the extruded nucleus and result in the generation of pain responses. Additionally, the nucleus pulposus has been shown to be a noxious stimulus that damages the function and structure of nerves on contact. The other source of nerve root compression commonly recognized is a decrease in intervertebral foramina space, which was previously believed to only be caused through losses in disc height. However, decreased intervertebral foramina space due to repetitive motions appears to be a viable pain generating pathway that may not directly correspond to simply a loss of specimen or disc height (Drake and Callaghan, 2008c– Chapter #6). This is new evidence for combined loading to generate pain through spinal deformation. The objective of many traditional treatments for nerve root compression focus on restoring lost disc height to remove the nerve root compression. Unfortunately, nerve root compression caused by repetitive loading may not be alleviated through this approach. This collection of studies was focused on determining whether altered load distribution in the spine, specifically between the intervertebral disc and facets, in response to applied axial twist loading (when added in combination with one and two axes of additional loading) was occurring, and examining how these modes of loading can contribute and/or alter the development of injury and pain. Therefore, findings generated from this thesis may have important implications for clinicians, researchers, and ergonomists.