In order to cope with an agricultural economic structure and the development of industrial and commercial use land, the government conducted significant amendment to the Statute for Agricultural Development, adjusting the original ¡§farmland owned by farmers¡¨ and ¡§farmland for agricultural use¡¨ to ¡§releasing farmland owned by farmers¡¨ and ¡§farm building on farmland.¡¨ In addition to loosening the qualifications for the acquisition of farmland, the government also allows for the construction of cluster farm buildings or individual farmhouses. The goal of the policy of cluster farm buildings is established upon the foundation of ¡§production, life, and ecology.¡¨ Regarding production, farmland is not allowed to be segmented, which is beneficial to the promotion of agricultural machinery and rewarding in the expansion of the scale of farmland operation. Regarding everyday life, the construction of well-planned public facilities is able to promote living environment and quality. Regarding ecology, the well-planned management of sewage processing can reduce environmental contamination, protecting the environment. Regarding landscape, the building of farmhouses in a cluster is able to make landscape harmonious. Regarding public investment, the concentration of government funds on a certain area is able to enhance the efficiency of public investment. Although the policy of farm building cluster is made with positive intensions, it is unable to compromise with the current situations of rural areas, rendering problems that affect the growth of rural areas. In fact, these problems have arisen because of the inadequacy of laws and regulations related to rural areas. Therefore, this research examines whether the policy of the construction of farm building cluster can accomplish the three major goals of the sustaining development of rural area and solve the problems of the current problems farm building clusters are facing now and possible solutions. The research employs literature review, secondary source analysis, and on-site investigation as methods. Interviews with various personnel related to the construction of farm buildings, such as administrative, reviewers, scholars, contractor, local farmers, and residents in farm building cluster are conducted with the help of the government. Integrating viewpoints and suggestions from the business, government, and academia, it provides references for the government to promote the amendment of laws and policies related to the construction of farm building cluster in the future. This research discovers that the construction of farm building clusters cannot accomplish its three original goals of ¡§protecting the integrity of farmland, avoiding the loss of excellent farmland, and promoting effective use of farmland¡¨, ¡§enhancing public construction to promote rural area¡¦s additive values, farmers¡¦ living quality, and harmony for the community¡¨, and ¡§avoiding farm buildings in clusters that contaminate farmland, protect ecological environment, and promote harmony in the community.¡¨ In the aspect of production, it suggests the government to 1. Limit the distance between farm buildings and farmland; 2. Prohibit using ¡§forests¡¨ and ¡§reserve areas on slopes¡¨ as farmland; 3. Delimit suitable areas for the construction of farm buildings; 4. Assist utilization of farmland to create production values. In the aspect of everyday life, it suggests 1. Delimit the standard of minimum area for the construction public facilities. In the aspect of ecology, it suggests 1. Build green belts between farm buildings and farmlands; 2. Delimit the standard of sewage discharge testing; 3. Provide funds to assist building ¡§green¡¨ farm buildings; 4. Refurbish old rural areas to make their appearance harmonious with farm building clusters. In the aspect of policy, it suggests 1. Established supervising and monitoring management system; 2. Prohibit the acquisition of farmland for the construction of farm buildings for 2 years to avoid farmland speculation; 3. Publicize laws and policies related to the construction of farm building cluster; 4. Simplify the application procedure of cluster construction; 5. Limit the number of the application of building individual farmhouses; 6. Establish service platform to assist farmers to plan and apply for the construction of farm building clusters by providing instant transparent information.

Cette thèse porte sur la coexistence entre l’activité agricole et les usages résidentiels des espaces périurbains via l’étude sociologique des nouvelles modalités de gestion du bâti viticole développées dans le département de l’Hérault. Nommés « hameaux agricoles », ces nouveautés répondent à la planification urbaine durable introduite par la loi SRU (2000) et ses conséquences sur le logement des agriculteurs et sur la cohabitation entre l’activité agricole et les usages résidentiels. Ces modes innovants de gestion du bâti agricole révèlent l’émergence d’une gestion publique de la cohabitation entre activité agricole et usages résidentiels. La thèse s’articule autour de deux principaux axes qui analysent 1) les conceptions politiques de la cohabitation entre activité agricole et usages résidentiels qui émanent de la loi SRU et de ses traductions en nouvelles modalités de gestion du bâti agricole, 2) de la cohabitation vécue par les agriculteurs et par les résidents dans les villages périurbains concernés par ces projets. L’analyse des conceptions politiques de la cohabitation permet de mettre à jour trois idéaux-types de « vivre ensemble ». La confrontation de ces conceptions politiques avec la réalité des dynamiques sociale, met à jour des problèmes inattendus d’équité sociale. La thèse se conclut sur des perspectives de recherche et d'action pour une gestion durable du bâti agricole. / This thesis highlights certain aspects of the coexistence between agriculture and residential uses in the periurban via a sociologic study of new ways of managing wine growers' farm buildings introduced in the department of the Hérault (France). Named “agricultural hamlets”, these innovations take into account legal requirements related to sustainable planning introduced by the SRU law (2000), the implications for farmers' dwellings and issues of the coexistence between agriculture and residential uses. These new ways of managing farm buildings reveal the emergence of a public management of this issue. The thesis is organized around two principal axes which analyze: 1) the political conceptions of the coexistence between agriculture and residential uses which result in the varied interpretation of the SRU law and in the development of new management of farm building, 2) the real-life experience of “living together” as experienced by farmers and residents of the periurban villages concerned by these projects. The analysis of the political conceptions of coexistence reveals three ideal types of “living together”. The confrontation of political conceptions with the reality of social dynamics brings to light unexpected problems of social equity. The thesis concludes with the presentation of the numerous perspectives of research and action on the sustainable management of farm building.

The theme of this thesis is the design of new agricultural building cowshed, near the town of Kamenný Újezd. The theoretical part consists of a literary research, which deals with description of possible and the most used variants of technical and technological equipment, supplemented by legislative conditions for the type of construction. The practical part deals with the design of technical and technological equipment, which is chosen as the most suitable for this construction. Then these designs are elaborated and plotted in disposition and technology schemes and drawings.

The aim of the master’s thesis is a project documentation of an farm building. It is a new building of stable for breeding of cows of Holstein cattle and accessories necessary for securing it is operation. The building is located in the cadastral territory of municipality Chromeč, district Šumperk. Base consist of a single building object and a stable construction builds up a second object. These two objects are operationally linked and they are connected by the gangway. The stable is designed for a maximum of 278 heads of Holstein cattle. The stable is a single-storey indoor building. In the background there are rooms and equipment necessary to procuring stable operation. A Base is a brick object with two floors. On the ground floor is a waiting room, parlour, technical facilities, rooms for a production of cheese and a cheese shop. Attic there is a background of employees, which is only over a part of the object. Roofs are slanting saddle-shaped. Building estate is situated in the flat terrain.