During my research career in Prof. V.J.Hruby's laboratory I worked on two different projects. The first project, which was initiated by the author, was planned to serve the need of our laboratory for a novel method of peptide cyclization. This method was planned to use recent advances in Pd0-catalyzed asymmetric synthesis combined with the structural richness offered by the Baylis-Hillman chemistry which could open new ways to diverse areas of drug design, molecular immunology and chemotherapy. This approach would provide cyclic peptides featuring N-alkylated amino acids that would confer high resistance to degradation by proteases. Because of numerous synthetic problems imposed, this strategy was not of considerable current use in peptide synthesis, especially on solid supports. However, despite a substantial amount of effort invested, this method faced serious drawbacks such as multistep synthesis and side reactions when applied to solid supports. Moreover, recent introduction of microwave technology which has helped to solve a great number of problems has led to a renaissance in the classical lactam and thioester bond cyclizations which overshadowed our quest for a novel methodology. The second project was focused on application of 4-anilidopiperidines for the synthesis of chimeric bioactive peptides. It was an effort towards the development of novel analgesics with reduced toxicity and enhanced potency. This project linked small molecule and multimeric ligand designs that were ongoing in our laboratory at the time. Major accomplishments in this project were made possible by successful resolution of several research challenges. I was able to find a straightforward, convenient and economical approach for the synthesis of novel analogues on a solid support. These developments led to novel compounds which showed substantial increases in their binding affinity relative to corresponding opioid analogues. To illustrate, compounds PET25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, and 32 showed high bioactivity and sub-nanomolar binding affinity to opioid receptors. Most of the peptides generated in the second project are still being investigated for their biological activities by our colleagues at the Department of Pharmacology, but the results to date indicate that some highly potent novel compounds have been made.

Each year countless lives are affected and about half a million people die from malaria, a disease caused by parasites originating from the Plasmodium family. The most virulent species of the parasite is Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum).   Calmodulin (CaM) is a small, 148 amino acid long, highly preserved and essential protein in all eukaryotic cells. Previous studies have determined that CaM is important for the reproduction and invasion of P. falciparum in host cells. The primary structure of human CaM (CaMhum) and CaM from P. falciparum (CaMpf) differ in merely 16 positions, making differences in their structures and ligand affinity interesting to study. Especially since possible inhibitors of CaMpf in favor of CaMhum, in extension, could give rise to new malaria treatments.   Some antagonists, functioning as inhibitors of CaM, have already been analysed in previous studies. However, there are also compounds that have not yet been studied in regards to being possible antagonists of CaM. This study regards three known antagonists; trifluoperazine (TFP), calmidazolium (CMZ) and artemisinin (ART) and also three recently created fentanyl derivatives; 3-OH-4-OMe-cyclopropylfentanyl (ligand 1), 4-OH-3OMe-4F-isobutyrylfentanyl (ligand 2) and 3-OH-4-OMe-isobutyrylfentanyl (ligand 3).   Bioinformatic methods, such as modelling and docking, were used to compare the structures of CaMhum and CaMpf as well as observe the interaction of the six ligands to CaM from both species. In addition to the differences in primary structure, distinguished with ClustalW, disparities in tertiary structure were observed. Structure analysis of CaMhum and CaMpf in PyMOL disclosed a more open conformation as well as a larger, more defined, hydrophobic cleft in CaMhum compared to CaMpf. Simulated binding of the six ligands to CaM from both species, using Autodock 4.2, indicated that TFP and ART bind with higher affinity to CaMhum which is expected. Ligand 2 and ligand 3 also bound with higher affinity and facilitated stronger binding to CaMhum, which is reasonable since their docking is based on how TFP binds to CaM. However, ligand 1 as well as CMZ both bound to CaMpf with higher affinity. Despite promising results for ligand 1 and CMZ, no decisive conclusion can be made solely based on bioinformatic studies.    To gain a better understanding on the protein-ligand interactions of the six ligands to CaMhum and CaMpf, further studies using e.g. circular dichroism and fluorescence would be advantageous. Based on the results from this study, future studies on the binding of CMZ and ligand 1 to CaM as well as ligands with similar characteristics would be especially valuable. This is because they, based on the results from this study, possibly are better inhibitors of CaMpf than CaMhum and thereby could function as possible antimalarial drugs.