Spelling suggestions: "subject:"defiltration"" "subject:"bifiltration""
51 |
The mechanics of asymmetric particle release during filter backwashing and migration of colloidsMahmood, Talat 08 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
52 |
Magnetically-seeded filtration of colloidal particlesYing, Tung-Yu 12 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
53 |
Improving filtration for removal of cryptosporidium oocysts and particles from drinking waterAmburgey, James E. 05 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
54 |
Some chemical aspects of rapid sand filtrationCrapps, David Kenneth 08 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
55 |
A laboratory investigation of uniform protective sand filtersDragan, Peter 05 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
56 |
Filtration and backwashing performance of biologically-active filtersAhmad, Rasheed 05 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
57 |
Particle removal within biological water treatment filtersEvans, Helen L. January 1998 (has links)
No description available.
|
58 |
An investigation into the fouling mechanism of a model beer during crossflow microfiltrationThomassen, Joanne K. January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
59 |
Low cost iron removal for handpump tubewellsAhmed, F. January 1987 (has links)
No description available.
|
60 |
Engineered Biofiltration for Ultrafiltration Fouling Control and DBP Precursor RemovalAzzeh, Jamal 24 June 2014 (has links)
Recently, treatment plants have adopted biofiltration to compliment conventional treatment and ozonation. Previous literature has focused on passive applications of biofiltration. In this study, several pilot-scale biofiltration trains were designed in parallel to conventional treatment to investigate the impact of nutrient addition (nitrogen and phosphorus), use of hydrogen peroxide, aluminum sulphate (alum), and different filtration media (anthracite vs. granular activated carbon (GAC)) on biofiltration performance. Parameters measured included organic removal, reduction of DBP precursor, improvements in filter runtimes and ultrafiltration (UF) fouling control. Nutrient addition did not improve biofiltration performance. Supplementing hydrogen peroxide (<1 mg/L) decreased headloss, DBP formation potentials while adversely affecting UF fouling. In-line alum addition (<0.5 mg/L) improved biofilter’s ability to control fouling and DBP precursor without adversely impacting headloss. GAC provided superior performance when compared to anthracite. Conventional treatment provided higher DOC, and DBP precursor removal, as well as better UF fouling control compared to biofiltration.
|
Page generated in 0.0872 seconds