In this dissertation, I examine the impact of earnings management and expectations management on the usefulness of earnings and analyst forecasts in firm valuation. Earnings and analyst forecasts are important inputs into accounting valuation models. Their ability to reflect current and predict future firm performance can help valuation models predict intrinsic value. However, increasing earnings management and expectations management activities in recent years may have adversely affected the usefulness of these information items in firm valuation. This study shows that intrinsic value metrics estimated using manipulated earnings or forecasts have less ability to track stock prices and predict future returns through V/P ratios, providing evidence for the joint hypothesis of (i) long-term market efficiency and (ii) the negative impact of earnings management and expectations management on the usefulness of earnings and analyst forecasts in firm valuation. It contributes to the accounting literature in several ways. First, it challenges the conventional view that more accurate and less biased forecasts are necessarily of better quality and proposes to assess the quality of analyst forecasts directly by examining their usefulness. It also introduces an improved measure for expectations management and presents new evidence on (i) the usefulness of earnings and analyst forecasts in firm valuation; (ii) the negative impacts of earnings management and expectations management on this usefulness; and (iii) the overall performance of accounting valuation models in firm valuation.

In this dissertation, I examine the impact of earnings management and expectations management on the usefulness of earnings and analyst forecasts in firm valuation. Earnings and analyst forecasts are important inputs into accounting valuation models. Their ability to reflect current and predict future firm performance can help valuation models predict intrinsic value. However, increasing earnings management and expectations management activities in recent years may have adversely affected the usefulness of these information items in firm valuation. This study shows that intrinsic value metrics estimated using manipulated earnings or forecasts have less ability to track stock prices and predict future returns through V/P ratios, providing evidence for the joint hypothesis of (i) long-term market efficiency and (ii) the negative impact of earnings management and expectations management on the usefulness of earnings and analyst forecasts in firm valuation. It contributes to the accounting literature in several ways. First, it challenges the conventional view that more accurate and less biased forecasts are necessarily of better quality and proposes to assess the quality of analyst forecasts directly by examining their usefulness. It also introduces an improved measure for expectations management and presents new evidence on (i) the usefulness of earnings and analyst forecasts in firm valuation; (ii) the negative impacts of earnings management and expectations management on this usefulness; and (iii) the overall performance of accounting valuation models in firm valuation.

This study provides two empirical studies in market-based accounting research. One study focuses on using out-of-sample valuation errors to evaluate various estimation approaches for firm-valuation models. The second empirical study uses portfolio analysis to evaluate an empirical accounting-based firm valuation model developed in the UK context.The first study uses out-of-sample valuation errors as an alternative metric capturing the effectiveness of various estimation approaches in generating reliable estimates of coefficients in accounting-based valuation models and, accordingly, less valuation bias and higher valuation accuracy. Valuation bias is expressed as the mean proportional valuation error, where estimated market value less the actually observed market value divided by the actual market value is the proportional valuation error, and valuation accuracy is measured by both the mean absolute and the mean squared proportional valuation error. We find that deflating the full equation including the constant term of the undeflated model and, hence, estimating without a constant term in the deflated model provides less bias and more accurate value estimates relative to including a constant term in the regression equation. Also estimating the valuation model on high- and low-intangible asset firms separately, instead of pooling the full sample for estimation, provides better performance in all cases. As expected, the results suggest that an extended model including the main accounting variables found to be associated with market value in the UK is better specified than a benchmark model, widely adopted in prior research, where market value is regressed on book value and earnings alone. Inclusion of 'other information' also seems to improve the performance of the models. However, there is no clear evidence that one particular deflator out of the five we investigate outperforms the others, although book value and opening and closing market value appear to generally perform better than sales and number of shares.The second empirical study tests for the existence of a 'mispricing' effect associated with accounting-based valuation models in the UK. It investigates a specific firm valuation model where market value is expressed as a linear combination of book value, earnings, research and development expenditures, dividends, capital contributions, capital expenditures and other information. All these accounting variables have been found value-relevant in prior studies in the UK. Firms are ranked by in-sample proportional valuation errors. Results show that although firms in the higher rank deciles tend to have higher abnormal returns than firms in the lower rank deciles, the difference between the two extreme portfolios (or the hedge returns) is statistically insignificant. As a consequence, accounting-based valuation models do not seem to provide superior estimates of intrinsic value to market values. We can conclude that the UK stock market is semi-strong form efficient, in the sense that it does not appear to be possible to generate positive abnormal returns based upon publicly available accounting information embedded in the valuation models studied.

No description available.

The theory of risk: definition, types, measurement and valuation of risk. Discount rate, valuation of risk when calculating the discount rate. Method to determine the discount rate (determining the cost of foreign capital, CAPM and modular method to determine the cost of equity. Application in Vietnam.

This study examines the role of board social and human capital in assessing the market value of firms in the UK context. As the world economy has shifted from manufacturing to service and knowledge-based economies, attributes such as knowledge, expertise, skills, ability and reputation are increasingly fundamental to the success of business enterprises. There is a growing consensus that these attributes are an increasingly valuable form of capital, asset or resource, despite their intangibility. In accounting, there are a number of problems arising from the accountability of non-physical, non-financial capital. Firstly, some forms of capital and certain assets are neither recognised nor presented in the statement of financial position. Secondly, some accounting practices relating to intangible assets are very conservative, resulting in undervalued assets and overstated liabilities. Consequently, there is an increasing gap between the book value and market value of firms. This gap restricts the relevance of information presented in financial statements and suggests that there is something missing in financial statements. This is the research problem being addressed in this study. While prior literature demonstrates that it has proven difficult to operationalise intangible forms of capital, there has been significant empirical attention and theoretical development in social and human forms. This thesis aims to contribute to accounting theory and practice by exploring the impact that board social and human capital have on firm market value. In light of extant research, it is hypothesised that social and human capital possessed at board level are positively related to the market value of firms. This study employs the Ohlson’s (1995) residual income valuation model to test the impact of social and human capital using a sample of UK firms listed on the FTSE All Share index for a period of 10 years (2001-2010). Social and human capital measures are derived from interlocking directorate ties and detailed biographic information of board directors. This study benefits from Pajek and Ucinet network packages to generate network maps and calculate positional metrics such as centrality and structural hole measures.

Concentrated corporate ownership prevails in most countries, so the relationship between controlling shareholders and minority shareholders is an important principle-agent problem. Tunnelling, the transfer of assets and profit for the benefit of controlling owners, is the most important way of expropriating small shareholders. While tunnelling is rampant in emerging economies and even some developed countries, related research lacks convincing evidence. On the other hand, large shareholders sometimes use private funds to prop up firms in financial distress. Although there is plenty of anecdotal and indirect evidence on propping, it lacks direct large-sample examination. This study presents a pooled cross-sectional analysis of 4373 publicly listed companies in China between 2001 and 2004. The analysis not only examines the effects of various variables on the exploitation of related party transactions by controlling owners for tunnelling and propping, and also investigates the effects of tunnelling and propping on firm performance and valuation. The study reveals that the presence of controlling shareholders and higher control rights lead to higher levels of tunnelling. Conversely the existence of other large shareholders reduces the magnitude of tunnelling. In addition, the study shows that pyramidal-controlled firms and firms owned by the State display more incidences of tunnelling. When firms have better investment opportunity, however, their controlling shareholders tend to divert fewer funds for their private gains. It is also found that controlling shareholders offer funds to financially stricken firms under their control. This is the first study that finds direct evidence on the occurrence of propping although not all badly-performing firms are propped up. / While tunnelling negatively affects operating performance and firm valuation, propping has a positive effect on firm valuation. The occurrence and magnitude of tunnelling is greater than that of propping. Propping only occurs to partial firms in financial distress, yet there is no improvement in those firms’ performance. As propping from new controlling owners is more a way of back-door listing, they tend to engage in tunnelling when their control is secure. In short, when legal protection of minority shareholders is weak, controlling owners tend to tunnel for private benefit. Hence policymakers and regulators must recognise that to eliminate widespread expropriation, the establishment of strong corporate governance in well-functioning institutions and strong legal enforcement is important. Lower levels of tunnelling in years 2003 and 2004 justify the positive effect of stringent regulation. Yet, more needs to be undertaken beyond the legal and regulatory level such as an allowance for diversified corporate ownership and the transformation of non-floatable shares to be floated on the exchange to align interests of large and minority shareholders.

Η εργασία αποτελείται από τρία κεφάλαια. Στο πρώτο κεφάλαιο γίνεται θεωρητική προσέγγιση της χρηματοοικονομικής ανάλυσης, των διαφόρων κατηγοριών ενδιαφερομένων ατόμων που ασχολούνται με αυτή, συνοπτική παρουσίαση των κυριοτέρων αριθμοδεικτών καθώς και των περισσότερο διαδεδομένων μεθόδων αποτίμησης επιχειρήσεων ή μεμονωμένων περιουσιακών στοιχείων. Στο δεύτερο κεφάλαιο γίνεται εταιρική παρουσίαση των δύο υπό εξέταση εταιρειών, VIVARTIA ABEE και COCA COLA HBC, χρηματοοικονομική ανάλυση των δύο εταιρειών με χρήση των κυριοτέρων αριθμοδεικτών, καθώς και mini SWOT ANALYSIS αυτών. Τέλος, στο τρίτο κεφάλαιο γίνεται εφαρμογή των καταλλήλων για τις δύο εταιρείες μεθόδων αποτίμησης, παρουσίαση των αποτελεσμάτων της αποτίμησης και εξαγωγή συμπερασμάτων. / This dissertation consists of three major chapters. In the first chapter take place a theoritical approach of financial analysis and the several types of the people,that they are interested in this field. Furthermore, this chapter contains a brief presentation of the major financial ratios and the most popular valuation methods. In the second chapter take place a general corporate presentation of the firms VIVARTIA ABEE & COCA COLA HBC,financial analysis of these two firms through the major financial ratios and also a mini SWOT ANALYSIS. Eventually, in the third chapter take place the application of the appropriate valuation methods, presentation of the valuation outcomes and then a brief conclusion.

The issue of dividends and what role it plays, has been the subject of discussion for decades. The main reason for this is that the chosen dividend policy for a company affects several different stakeholders, with shareholders being the most affected party. Determining dividend policy is influenced by multiple factors such as capital structure, potential stakeholder signaling and corporate culture concerning payouts. This study will investigate how the relationship between firm performance and stock price is affected by the level of dividends a firm pays. To explore this relationship, the authors will conduct a correlation and regression analysis that is performed on data collected on middle and large capitalization firms listed on the Stockholm stock exchange. The chosen time frame for this study is year 2007-2017. Several variables are included in the regression model in order to explore a potential relationship.  The findings of this study indicate that the stock price of high dividend yield firms are more dependent on financial performance compared to low dividend yield firms. However, an overall positive correlation is found between financial performance and stock price for both samples.

Understanding the contribution of marketing to the shareholder value of a company has been a major challenge for marketing research. The purpose of this dissertation was creating and validating an attitudinal measure of customer equity in hospitality businesses, thus providing a link between return on marketing and the shareholder value of a company. The theoretical background of the customer equity construct was examined, and then systematic scale development processes were initiated. The results produced two concise scales: (1) 17 items that represent the six dimensions of customer equity in the restaurant industry and (2) 19 items that represent the six dimensions of customer equity in the hotel industry. Six dimensions of customer equity achieved strong convergent validity, discriminant validity, and internal consistency, indicating unidimensionality of the constructs. To further validate the newly developed scale, criterion validity was checked in correlation with six criterion measures using data collected from 590 hospitality industry consumers. The results demonstrate that customer equity closely reflects the shareholder value of a company. Also, it was found that value equity, brand equity, relationship equity, and service quality are significantly and positively correlated with overall customer equity of a company. In conclusion, customer equity represents the long-term value of a company, and reflects shareholder value of the company, thus providing a link with return on marketing investments. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed. / Ph. D.