Le syndrome de Gougerot-Sjögren (SGS) est une épithélite auto-immune caractérisée par des lésions des glandes exocrines et manifestations systémiques. Une des complications majeures est la survenue chez 5% des malades, d’un lymphome non-hodgkininen (NHL). La contribution majeure des lymphocytes B (LB) a récemment été démontrée. Dans ce travail, nous avons voulu aborder des sujets cliniques et fondamentaux concernant le rôle des LB dans le SGS. Dans un premier temps, nous avons démontré que des LB mémoires sont visibles dans des infiltrats des échantillons de la peau et sa présence peut aider au diagnostic. Dans un deuxième temps, nous avons démontré que la cytokine FLT3-L augmentée (une cytokine impliquée dans l’ontogenèse des LB et lympho-prolifération) est associée à une distribution anormale des LB dans les malades. En plus, le rôle prolifératif de FLT3-L sur les LB pourrait expliquer l’évolution vers le NHL. Dans un troisième temps, nous avons étudié une autre cytokine dérégulée dans le SGS (la cytokine BAFF) et nous avons confirmé le rôle d’un nouveau variant de BAFF produit par l’épissage alternatif de l’exon 4 (∆4BAFF) comme un facteur de transcription de son propre gène. Ce nouveau variant est beaucoup plus exprimé au cours des maladies autoimmunes, et son expression est contrôlée par l’interferon gamma et la protéine SC35. Tous ces données montrent pour la première fois, un nouveau concept à savoir la possibilité pour une cytokine d’être régulée par un variant provenant de l’épissage alternatif de son propre gène. Ensemble, ces résultats montrent le rôle des cytokines impliquées dans l’ontogenèse et la survie des LB, dans la physiopathologie du SGS. / Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome (pSS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by sicca symptoms and a broad variety of systemic manifestations. The most severe complication of the disease is the development of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) in 5% of patients. Recent evidence indicates a major contribution of B cells. In this work, we developed clinical and basic research subjects, related to the role of B-cell in the pathogenesis of pSS. In the first section, we showed that memory B-cell infiltrates are present in pSS and may be used as an additional diagnostic and follow-up tool. In the second section, we showed that high serum levels of the cytokine called FLT3-L (a cytokine implicated in B-cell ontogenesis and lymphoproliferation) are associated with abnormal B-cell distribution, characteristic of pSS; and disease clinical activity. In addition, this cytokine may explain the development of lymphoma. In the third section, we demonstrated that ∆4BAFF (a new variant of BAFF, due to the alternative splicing of exon 4) is a transcription factor of its own gene. Interestingly, this new variant is mainly detected in autoimmune diseases and its expression is regulated by IFN-y and SC35 protein (one of the proteins implicated in the splicing machinery). This finding provides an expanded conceptual view of BAFF gene regulation in autoimmune diseases, and contributes to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in BAFF up-regulation in autoimmunity. Collectively, these results are of clinical and fundamental basic interest in pSS, in the diagnostic, physiopathology and therapeutic contexts.

<p>Pin1 is a ubiquitously expressed phosphorylation-specific prolyl isomerase that regulates substrate function by catalyzing the cis-trans isomerization of prolyl bonds. Through this modulation, Pin1 has been shown to influence the stability, localization, and/or activity of a diverse set of protein substrates that participate in a variety of cellular responses, such as cell cycle progression, modulation of cell stress, and apoptosis. In addition to extensive studies in non-hematopoietic cells, Pin1 has also been shown to regulate immune cell function. Indeed, Pin1 participates in germinal center B cell development and eosinophil granulocyte survival. It also facilitates cytokine production in T cells, eosinophil granulocytes, and plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Through specific activities such as these, Pin1 has been demonstrated to modulate responses to viral challenge, respiratory allergens, and organ transplantation. </p><p>Due to previously described functions of Pin1 in regulating cells of both the innate and adaptive immune system, we predicted that Pin1 would participate in systemic inflammatory responses. Upon inducing systemic inflammation in mice, we observed a profound reduction in circulating cytokine concentrations in Pin1-null mice compared to WT mice. This result prompted further investigations, which are described in chapter 3 and chapter 4 of this dissertation. In chapter 3, we evaluate the potential contribution of macrophages to the defects we observe in LPS-challenged Pin1-null mice. Using primary macrophages, bone marrow-derived macrophages, and MEF, we ultimately exclude a role for Pin1 in modulating LPS-induced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in these cells. In chapter 4, we uncover a defect in the accumulation of conventional dendritic cells (cDC) in LPS-challenged Pin1-null mice. Upon more careful examination of spleen cDC subsets in Pin1-null mice, we discovered a defect in the CD8+ subset. Experiments described in this chapter collectively indicate a role for Pin1 in preferentially modulating late stages of development of the CD8+ subset of cDC. Consistent with such a defect, the expansion of adoptively transferred WT CD8+ T cells was less robust in Pin1-null mice than WT mice upon infection with the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes . At the end of chapter 4, we provide evidence that Pin1 facilitates the degradation of the hematopoietic transcription factor PU.1, and propose that deregulation of PU.1 expression may be one mechanism by which Pin1 modulates CD8+ cDC development. The work described in this dissertation began by evaluating a potential role for Pin1 in modulating pro-inflammatory cytokine production in macrophages; ultimately, however, we uncovered a novel role for Pin1 in preferentially modulating the development of the CD8+ subset of cDC. The results presented herein expand the current understanding of DC development and further implicate Pin1 as an important modulator of both innate and adaptive immune responses.</p> / Dissertation

Dans les cas de lymphopénie, les lymphocytes T résiduels prolifèrent exagérément dans un phénomène appelé «expansion homéostatique périphérique» (HPE), qui est efficace pour la régénération des T CD8+, mais inefficace pour les T CD4+. L’interleukine-7 (IL7) est une cytokine homéostatique utilisée afin d’augmenter les comptes lymphocytaires T des patients lymphopéniques. Toutefois, la raison de l’expansion préférentielle des lymphocytes T CD8+ par l’IL7 demeure toujours inconnue. Nous montrons que cette expansion est due au fait que l’IL7 induit une prolifération efficace des T CD8+ périphériques (CD8+PERI) ainsi que des émigrants thymiques CD8+ (CD8+RTEs). Par contre, l’effet prolifératif de l’IL7 est restreint presqu’uniquement aux CD4+RTEs même si les CD4+PERI survivent mieux que les CD4+RTEs. De plus faibles doses d’IL7 sont nécessaires aux CD4+RTEs afin de phosphoryler STAT5 ou de proliférer comparativement aux CD4+PERI et nous démontrons que les contacts TCR/CMHII sont nécessaires à la prolifération induite par l’IL7 des CD4+RTEs en périphérie. De fait, augmenter au Flt3 ligand le nombre de cellules dendritiques périphériques d’une souris donneuse, avant de transférer ses TPERI dans des souris receveuses traitées à l’IL7 induit une prolifération significative des CD4+PERI. Nos résultats indiquent donc que l’abondance des contacts TCR/CMHII reçus dans le thymus semble contrôler la sensibilité à l’IL7 des CD4+RTEs. Finalement, l’observation que les CD8+PERI et CD8+RTEs prolifèrent pareillement pendant la thérapie à l’IL7, alors que la prolifération des T CD4+ est largement restreinte aux RTEs expliquerait pourquoi, dans les cas de lymphopénie, la régénération des T CD4+ est aussi dépendante de la thymopoïèse. / In lymphopenic settings, residual T lymphocytes typically undergo exaggerated proliferation via homeostatic peripheral expansion (HPE). While HPE efficiently regenerates CD8+ T cells, it is unable to normalize CD4+ T-cell counts. Interleukin-7 (IL7) is a homeostatic cytokine, currently used in trials in order to increase T-cell counts in lymphopenic humans. Nowadays, it is still not known why IL7 therapy is more effective toward the expansion of CD8+ T cells rather than CD4+ T cells. Here we show that CD8+ T cells preferential expansion is due to IL7-induced efficient proliferation of peripheral CD8+ T cells (CD8+PERI) and CD8+ recent thymic emigrants (CD8+RTEs). In contrast, the proliferative action of IL7 is largely restricted to CD4+RTEs although CD4+PERI survive better than CD4+RTEs. Interestingly, CD4+RTEs require lower concentrations of IL7 in order to phosphorylate STAT5 or proliferate when compared to CD4+PERI, and we demonstrate the requirement for TCR/MHCII contacts to support the IL7-induced HPE of CD4+RTEs in the periphery. Furthermore, augmenting the number of MHCII expressing cells in the periphery of donor mice by treating them with Flt3 ligand (Flt3L) prior transferring their TPERI cells in IL7 therapy-treated recipients, significantly enhances the IL7-induced proliferation of CD4+PERI. Our results indicate so far that the abundance of TCR triggering occurring inside the thymus drives IL7 responsiveness of CD4+RTEs. Moreover, the observation that CD8+PERI and CD8+RTE proliferate similarly during IL7 therapy, while proliferation of CD4+ T cells is largely restricted to RTEs, may explain why CD4+ T cells regeneration in lymphopenic settings is highly dependent on thymopoiesis.

Dans les cas de lymphopénie, les lymphocytes T résiduels prolifèrent exagérément dans un phénomène appelé «expansion homéostatique périphérique» (HPE), qui est efficace pour la régénération des T CD8+, mais inefficace pour les T CD4+. L’interleukine-7 (IL7) est une cytokine homéostatique utilisée afin d’augmenter les comptes lymphocytaires T des patients lymphopéniques. Toutefois, la raison de l’expansion préférentielle des lymphocytes T CD8+ par l’IL7 demeure toujours inconnue. Nous montrons que cette expansion est due au fait que l’IL7 induit une prolifération efficace des T CD8+ périphériques (CD8+PERI) ainsi que des émigrants thymiques CD8+ (CD8+RTEs). Par contre, l’effet prolifératif de l’IL7 est restreint presqu’uniquement aux CD4+RTEs même si les CD4+PERI survivent mieux que les CD4+RTEs. De plus faibles doses d’IL7 sont nécessaires aux CD4+RTEs afin de phosphoryler STAT5 ou de proliférer comparativement aux CD4+PERI et nous démontrons que les contacts TCR/CMHII sont nécessaires à la prolifération induite par l’IL7 des CD4+RTEs en périphérie. De fait, augmenter au Flt3 ligand le nombre de cellules dendritiques périphériques d’une souris donneuse, avant de transférer ses TPERI dans des souris receveuses traitées à l’IL7 induit une prolifération significative des CD4+PERI. Nos résultats indiquent donc que l’abondance des contacts TCR/CMHII reçus dans le thymus semble contrôler la sensibilité à l’IL7 des CD4+RTEs. Finalement, l’observation que les CD8+PERI et CD8+RTEs prolifèrent pareillement pendant la thérapie à l’IL7, alors que la prolifération des T CD4+ est largement restreinte aux RTEs expliquerait pourquoi, dans les cas de lymphopénie, la régénération des T CD4+ est aussi dépendante de la thymopoïèse. / In lymphopenic settings, residual T lymphocytes typically undergo exaggerated proliferation via homeostatic peripheral expansion (HPE). While HPE efficiently regenerates CD8+ T cells, it is unable to normalize CD4+ T-cell counts. Interleukin-7 (IL7) is a homeostatic cytokine, currently used in trials in order to increase T-cell counts in lymphopenic humans. Nowadays, it is still not known why IL7 therapy is more effective toward the expansion of CD8+ T cells rather than CD4+ T cells. Here we show that CD8+ T cells preferential expansion is due to IL7-induced efficient proliferation of peripheral CD8+ T cells (CD8+PERI) and CD8+ recent thymic emigrants (CD8+RTEs). In contrast, the proliferative action of IL7 is largely restricted to CD4+RTEs although CD4+PERI survive better than CD4+RTEs. Interestingly, CD4+RTEs require lower concentrations of IL7 in order to phosphorylate STAT5 or proliferate when compared to CD4+PERI, and we demonstrate the requirement for TCR/MHCII contacts to support the IL7-induced HPE of CD4+RTEs in the periphery. Furthermore, augmenting the number of MHCII expressing cells in the periphery of donor mice by treating them with Flt3 ligand (Flt3L) prior transferring their TPERI cells in IL7 therapy-treated recipients, significantly enhances the IL7-induced proliferation of CD4+PERI. Our results indicate so far that the abundance of TCR triggering occurring inside the thymus drives IL7 responsiveness of CD4+RTEs. Moreover, the observation that CD8+PERI and CD8+RTE proliferate similarly during IL7 therapy, while proliferation of CD4+ T cells is largely restricted to RTEs, may explain why CD4+ T cells regeneration in lymphopenic settings is highly dependent on thymopoiesis.

Dendritic cells (DC) are antigen-presenting cells that are critical for the initiation and regulation of the immune response. Several DC subtypes within mouse spleen have previously been characterised and these include the plasmacytoid (pDC), and conventional DC (cDC) of the CD8+ and CD8- subtypes. Each subtype appears to have a specialised role in the various arms of immunity and tolerance. Less clear is the process by which these DC develop from haematopoietic precursors, of the precursor stages and branch points from bone marrow (BM) stem cells to each of the peripheral DC subtypes. The research described herein had the aim of identifying and isolating some of the intermediate precursors of DC, downstream of stem cells, and determining whether these differed in the steady-state versus inflammation. Particular was given to DC of the spleen. Experiments that sought the identity of such precursors involved both i) transfer of cell fractions that contained DC precursors into steady-state or inflamed recipient mice to assess their in vivo development at later times, and ii) analysis of an in vitro culture system to question whether it reflected development of the steady-state DC subtypes.