Spelling suggestions: "subject:"fluidized bed."" "subject:"tluidized bed.""
91 |
Heat transfer between a shallow fluidized bed and a single horizontal tube immersed in the bedHuang, Hao-Hsin January 1983 (has links)
M. S.
|
92 |
Plasma Spouted Bed Calcination of Lac Doré Vanadium Ore ConcentrateKreibaum, Jan January 1986 (has links)
Note:
|
93 |
Study of Gas-Solid Slugging Fluidized Bed with Geldart D Particles Using High-Temperature Electrical Capacitance Volume TomographyXu, Mingyuan, Xu January 2017 (has links)
No description available.
|
94 |
MTBE AND BTEX BIODEGRADATION IN A POROUS POT AND A FLUIDIZED BED REACTORSEDRAN, MARIE ALLYSON 31 March 2004 (has links)
No description available.
|
95 |
Biological Treatment of Nitrophenol Containing Wastewater Using Ethanol and Acetic Acid as SubstratesSurendran, Suvid 06 August 2010 (has links)
No description available.
|
96 |
Combustion of solid fuel in a fluidized bed combustorHossain, Abu Noman January 1998 (has links)
No description available.
|
97 |
Comparison of the rates of attrition of Clarion 4A coal and char in a fluidized bedOgonor, Vincent Onyematara O. January 1982 (has links)
No description available.
|
98 |
The internal circulation of the adjacent fluidized bed reactorShih, Chuan-Cheng January 1989 (has links)
No description available.
|
99 |
Kinetic study of some gaseous reactions over ash in the fluidized-bed reactorSheu, Feng-Ran January 1983 (has links)
No description available.
|
100 |
Effect of land application of fluidized-bed combustion residue on soil and plant characteristics of reclaimed surface-mined pastures, performance and mineral status of grazing steers and nutrient balance by sheep fed the forageCochran, Michele A. 22 June 2010 (has links)
Fluidized-bed combustion residue (FBCR) results from mixing coal with limestone during the combustion process. This by-product may be used as a liming agent. A grazing trial was conducted on an acidic mine soil to compare FBCR to dolomitic limestone and no amendment (control). Six steers per treatment were grazed rotationally on three replications (rep) of three .8 ha pastures. Both materials increased soil pH similarly, and reduced plant uptake of Fe, Zn, Mn, and Ni similarly. Calcium concentration increased in forages by both amendments, Mg increased with limestone and S with FBCR application. Cell wall components decreased, while ash and lignin increased with both amendments. Serum mineral levels of cattle were normal except Cu was low. Animal tissues reflected differences in mineral concentration observed in forages. Hay harvested from one rep was used in a mineral balance trial with 18 wethers. Apparent digestibility of dry matter, crude protein and fiber components, and N retention were not affected by treatment. Control animals were in negative Ca balance. Apparent absorption of Mg was higher (P < .01) for limestone treatment animals; S absorption was higher for the FBCR group; and, Zn absorption was higher for controls. Serum mineral levels of sheep were normal except Cu was low. No appreciable accumulation of heavy metals occurred in forage or animal tissues. Low Cu levels observed for all treatment groups indicate a problem inherent of the study site. FBCR appears to be a safe and efficient soil pH amendment. / Master of Science
|
Page generated in 0.0628 seconds