The new EU Forest Strategy for 2030, one of the flagship initiatives of the European Green Deal, has put EU forest policy in a new expansionary phase with ambitious goals for future forest management in Member States. This thesis analyzes contestation over the EU Forest Strategy for 2030 in Sweden to understand how discursive representations of forests are interlinked with justice perceptions. By utilizing poststructuralist discourse theory and the logics framework, and analyzing EU forest policy documents, Swedish parliamentary debates, and interviews with Swedish forest stakeholders, this thesis shows how sustainable forest management functions as a floating signifier and how different discursive understandings of this concept leads to different understandings of justice in forest management and thus how a just transition in forestry should look like. In the Swedish reception of the new Strategy, a commodity discourse and a conservation discourse could be identified where both highlighted the importance of the private forest owner in relation to justice perceptions in Sweden. The results show how the discourses attempt to invest the role of private forest owners with different meanings. Thus, this thesis contributes to the literature on just transitions by showing how justice perceptions are discursively interlinked with understandings of the role of forests, and how political contestation over this takes place.

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and discuss the evolution of forest management practices in the United States. The paper discusses the trends in forest management that have occurred within the United States in general, and specifically within the western (Oregon) and southern (North Carolina and Florida) United States. The trends discussed include the three (3) to four (4) epochs of management and use that are generally accepted within the forest management literature, with the exception of North Carolina that is in the process of a fifth (5). The comparative analysis within the paper discusses the western model of management which tends to be distinctly different from the southern model in terms of regulatory approaches. The western model (i.e. Oregon) tends to be highly regulated, while the southern model is primarily voluntary, and quasi-regulatory in terms of using alternative mechanisms of regulation (i.e. Best Management Practices that regulate water quality). The paper also discusses the role of professionalism within the various forest services in each state, although the regulatory mechanism is the most important explanatory variable. In general, each state's forest services tend to be highly professional with licensing requirements, educational services and cooperative management. The two models are also distinctly different in terms of ownership, with Oregon being owned (nearly 50%) by the public, whereas the southern states are dominated by Nonindustrial Private Forest Owners (NIPF).

No description available.

The objective of the study was to determine how various capital gains tax structures affect decisions to invest in new forest investments. These effects were measured by changes in the after-tax present values of bare land under each tax structure. The three capital gains tax structures modeled were: the current federal income tax law without basis indexing, the current federal income tax law with basis indexing, and the accrued income tax with indexing. Other things equal, the direction of effects on present values of bare land of capital gains tax structures and the other factors in the model was the same for White pine Christmas trees and Douglas fir timber. Highest present values occurred with basis indexing and lowest present values were with the accrued income tax structure, in all possible combinations of the above variables. Higher present values with basis indexing were due to tax savings. Tax saving from basis indexing per dollar of cost basis increases, reaches a maximum, then decreases as the payoff period lengthens, at a given inflation rate, with all other things equal. The payoff period that maximizes tax savings per dollar of cost basis decreases, as real interest rates increase. When the capital gains tax rate is 34% and inflation rate is 5%, and when real interest rates range from 3% to 9%, the payoff period with maximum tax savings ranges from 20 to 10 years. Since most forest investments have rotations longer than 20 years, this result implies that basis indexing will probably not affect decisions about new forest investments very much. It will also not affect the timing of gains realization for capital assets, not necessarily forestry in nature only, that had already been held for longer than 20 years. Two equity criteria were considered in the study. The first criterion requires the tax to be neutral with respect to allocation of land to different uses. The second criterion requires capital gains recipients to pay, at investment maturity and with other things equal, taxes equal to the sum of annual taxes on increases in asset value (accrued income) accumulated with interest. The study showed that, without inflation, the realized income tax (the current federal income tax) is neutral with respect to allocation of land to uses with different rotations because the tax reduces the bid prices for land uses with different rotations by equal percentages, other things equal. However, with inflation, the results suggest that basis indexing is needed in order to maintain the tax’s neutrality with respect to allocation of land to uses with different rotations. Under the second criterion, a forestry example was compared with a bank account, both with equal value growth rates. It showed that taxes paid on realized capital gains at investment maturity are lower than the sum of annual taxes on accrued income accumulated with interest, given the same tax rate. Thus, the current federal income tax, which taxes capital gains upon realization, does not meet the second equity criterion. Based on this criterion, the tax favors assets that yield capital gains over assets with annual incomes. In order to meet the second equity criterion, realized capital gains should pay taxes at the ERITAX rate. The ERITAX rate, when applied to realized capital gains, gives tax revenues equal to accrued income taxes accumulated with interest to investment maturity. However, when the annual accrued income tax rate is high, or when the rotation is long, or when the timber value growth rate is low relative to the interest rate, the ERITAX rate can exceed 100% of the capital gains, thus driving some bare land values below values in alternative uses. This result is consistent with the finding that the accrued income tax is non-neutral with respect to allocation of land to different uses and is biased against land uses with long payoff periods, given the same establishment costs. Thus, when the second equity criterion is met, the tax becomes biased against land uses with long rotations. These results indicate that none of the taxes modeled can meet the two equity criteria simultaneously. Even so, among forest investments, the current federal income tax with basis indexing is the most desirable because it is least likely to distort allocation of land to forestry. / Ph. D.

This PhD dissertation represents an effort to understand individual behavior leading to decisions regarding natural resource use and compliance with conservation policy at the government and at the community levels through the analysis of specific cases in the Brazilian Amazon. I first analyze the case of smallholder land clearing along the Transamazon and BR-163 highways in the face of Brazilian Forest Code enforcement by the federal government. My hypothesis is that smallholder land clearing paths over time are affected by assessments of the probability of being caught violating the Forest Code. I develop a dynamic decision model that considers the potential benefits and costs accrued from land clearing through time by a representative smallholder and include her perception of the probability of Forest Code enforcement, unobserved to the researcher. I apply an endogenous switching regressions econometric model to data collected with a sample of 542 households in 2003 and 2013/14. I find that longer land tenure frontiers where there are opportunities for smallholders to transition to cattle grazing from agriculture deserve the attention of enforcement of land clearing laws and restrictions and that the use of the forest by a smallholder is a protective signal that must be considered and encouraged. My results suggest that alleged government efforts to enforce the Forest Code among smallholders in the sample region have been ineffective. The second case I analyze is that of fisher households that enforce community fishing agreements, known as accords, in the floodplains of the Amazon River surrounding the city of Santarém. My hypothesis is that individual households benefit from their own fishing accords enforcement effort through fishing time savings. A factor demand analysis applied to data collected with over 600 households reveals that statistically important drivers of labor demand and fuel include the level of dedication of a household and its history in implementing fishing accords, the landscape, the flood cycle, the distance to the main regional market and biomass. The average household fishing time savings from enforcing accords range between 59 and 36 eight-hour days for a six-month-period, an important argument for continuing the enterprise. / PHD

Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2018-05-11T19:11:52Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2012 - Telmo Borges Silveira Filho.pdf: 2496110 bytes, checksum: 87e023489eb9ee097d8af1e936b6800c (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-11T19:11:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2012 - Telmo Borges Silveira Filho.pdf: 2496110 bytes, checksum: 87e023489eb9ee097d8af1e936b6800c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-08-27 / This study aimed to capture the action and inaction of the State in forest policy Federated Unit of Rio de Janeiro, and sought, the following objectives: identify the functions of state forest in the Constitutions of UF; analyze the evolution of institutions for forest management between 1975-2011; analyze the policy instruments employed in the state forest; examine the process of decentralization of state forest management. Data and information were obtained from different legal and institutional sources, and partly directly in SEA and INEA, by the author. Was used as theoretical, analytical models of Rocha e Silva (2007) and Silva (1996, 2001, 2003), respectively, for folding in the constitutions of state functions, and functions of State in forestry and its meeting in Rio de Janeiro, the model of Smith (1997, 2010) to analyze the bases of forest policy, forest management factual state was analyzed by confronting institutional responsibilities contained in the Technical Cooperation Agreement signed between IBAMA and ERJ , and additionally with the aid of the Monitoring and Evaluation Matrix for GTZ developed for protected areas. The main conclusions were: the six functions typical of the forest area have been upheld by the Federal and State Constitutions, the ERJ presented between 1975 and 2011 commuting action and inaction in relation to forest policy, economic instruments created in the period incorporated significant financial resources but without a corresponding consideration in forest management, the decentralization of forest management, the ERJ has advanced to monitor and evaluate the process with the State Prosecutor, municipalities and society, having as a privileged forum Conema. / Este estudo teve como objetivo geral apreender a a??o e a ina??o do Estado na pol?tica florestal da Unidade Federada Rio de Janeiro e buscou como objetivos espec?ficos: identificar as fun??es florestais de Estado nas Constitui??es da UF; analisar a evolu??o das institui??es de gest?o florestal entre 1975-2011; analisar os instrumentos de pol?tica florestal empregados no estado; examinar o processo de descentraliza??o da gest?o florestal estadual. Os dados e informa??es foram obtidos de distintas fontes legais e institucionais e, parte, diretamente na SEA e INEA, pelo autor. Utilizou-se como referenciais te?ricos: os modelos de an?lise de Rocha e Silva (2007), e Silva (1996, 2001, 2003), respectivamente para o rebatimento das fun??es estatais nas Constitui??es, e para as fun??es de Estado na ?rea florestal e seu cumprimento no Rio de Janeiro; o modelo de Silva (1997, 2010) para a an?lise das bases da pol?tica florestal; a gest?o factual florestal no estado foi analisada confrontando-se ?s compet?ncias institucionais contidas no Termo de Coopera??o T?cnica firmado entre o ERJ e o Ibama e adicionalmente com aux?lio da Matriz de Avalia??o e Acompanhamento desenvolvida Pela GTZ, para unidades de conserva??o. As principais conclus?es foram: as seis fun??es t?picas de estado na ?rea florestal possuem amparo nas Constitui??es Federal e Estadual; o ERJ apresentou entre 1975 e 2011 movimentos pendulares de a??o e ina??o relativamente ? pol?tica florestal; os instrumentos econ?micos criados no per?odo incorporaram expressivos recursos financeiros mas sem a correspondente contrapartida na gest?o florestal; na descentraliza??o da gest?o florestal, o ERJ tem avan?ado ao acompanhar e avaliar o processo junto ao Minist?rio P?blico Estadual, aos munic?pios e ? sociedade, tendo como foro privilegiado o Conema.

<p>This dissertation examines efforts to integrate a “new” policy sector – forest and forestry – into the European Union (EU). There is currently no legal foundation for a common forest policy and some member states (not least Sweden), as well as parts of the forestry sector, have been strongly opposed to one. At the same time, administrative units and structures within the EU have been created and they and some member states have promoted a common policy. This raises the question how can we understand and explain this?</p><p>The purpose of this dissertation is to problematise, map and analyse mainly Swedish actors’ attitudes to efforts to create a common forest policy within the EU. The study is based on neofunctionalism, which is a classic theory of integration, but it uses newer theorising (from intergovernmentalism and modern versions of neofunctionalism) to address some of the weaknesses of the approach.</p><p>I investigate the role, preferences and strategies of the main actors. This includes EU institutions and member states. I also map European industry interests and other associations, interest groups and active networks and study their role in the process. In these multi-national settings, I pay particular (although not exclusive) attention to their Swedish members. Within Sweden, I examine how governmental and non-governmental forest actors behave vis-à-vis the EU.</p><p>The empirical investigation shows that some of Swedish actors, for example the private forest owners’ organisation and forest industries associations, have change their preferences and strate gies over time. They have come to believe that whether they like it or not, other policy areas affect forest and forestry both directly and indirectly. Because of this, they now take the position that it is better to promote a limited European forest policy rather than remaining aloof and risk the creation of a much more comprehensive and centralised policy. At the same time (and for now at least), the Swedish government and most party politicians remain opposed to any attempt to formalise a forest policy within the EU.</p><p>This study contributes new knowledge about how new policy areas become integrated within EU, including knowledge about the roles that different actors can have in such processes. The results are of interest to researchers, decision makers and the interested public. They can also influence thinking about Sweden’s influence in, and relation to, EU forest policy.</p><p>Based on the empirical results, my theoretical conclusion is that organised interests have an important role in the integration process. The integration process of forest and forestry is not driven by one actor, but by many different actors, who operate on different levels and who have different interests.</p><p>This study shows that forest and forestry-related questions have come to the EU, and they will remain there. The important question for the future is not if there will be some kind of European level policy on forest and forestry, but rather what form European policy will take.</p>

This dissertation examines efforts to integrate a “new” policy sector – forest and forestry – into the European Union (EU). There is currently no legal foundation for a common forest policy and some member states (not least Sweden), as well as parts of the forestry sector, have been strongly opposed to one. At the same time, administrative units and structures within the EU have been created and they and some member states have promoted a common policy. This raises the question how can we understand and explain this? The purpose of this dissertation is to problematise, map and analyse mainly Swedish actors’ attitudes to efforts to create a common forest policy within the EU. The study is based on neofunctionalism, which is a classic theory of integration, but it uses newer theorising (from intergovernmentalism and modern versions of neofunctionalism) to address some of the weaknesses of the approach. I investigate the role, preferences and strategies of the main actors. This includes EU institutions and member states. I also map European industry interests and other associations, interest groups and active networks and study their role in the process. In these multi-national settings, I pay particular (although not exclusive) attention to their Swedish members. Within Sweden, I examine how governmental and non-governmental forest actors behave vis-à-vis the EU. The empirical investigation shows that some of Swedish actors, for example the private forest owners’ organisation and forest industries associations, have change their preferences and strate gies over time. They have come to believe that whether they like it or not, other policy areas affect forest and forestry both directly and indirectly. Because of this, they now take the position that it is better to promote a limited European forest policy rather than remaining aloof and risk the creation of a much more comprehensive and centralised policy. At the same time (and for now at least), the Swedish government and most party politicians remain opposed to any attempt to formalise a forest policy within the EU. This study contributes new knowledge about how new policy areas become integrated within EU, including knowledge about the roles that different actors can have in such processes. The results are of interest to researchers, decision makers and the interested public. They can also influence thinking about Sweden’s influence in, and relation to, EU forest policy. Based on the empirical results, my theoretical conclusion is that organised interests have an important role in the integration process. The integration process of forest and forestry is not driven by one actor, but by many different actors, who operate on different levels and who have different interests. This study shows that forest and forestry-related questions have come to the EU, and they will remain there. The important question for the future is not if there will be some kind of European level policy on forest and forestry, but rather what form European policy will take.

Tez (Yüksek Lisans) - Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kamu Yönetimi Anabilim Dalı, 2008. / Kaynakça var.

Title from title page of PDF (University of Missouri--St. Louis, viewed February 24, 2010). Includes bibliographical references (p. 328-345).