迴歸模式的變數選取是很重要的課題，Tibshirani於1996年提出最小絕對壓縮挑選機制（Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator；簡稱Lasso），主要特色是能在估計的過程中自動完成變數選取。但因為Lasso本身並沒有牽扯到統計推論的層面，因此2014年時Lockhart et al.所提出的Lasso顯著性檢定是重要的突破。由於Lasso顯著性檢定的建構過程與傳統向前逐步迴歸相近，本研究接續Lockhart et al.(2014)對兩種變數選取方法的比較，提出以Bootstrap來改良傳統向前逐步迴歸；最後並比較Lasso、Lasso顯著性檢定、傳統向前逐步迴歸、以AIC決定變數組合的向前逐步迴歸，以及以Bootstrap改良的向前逐步迴歸等五種方法變數選取之效果。最後發現Lasso顯著性檢定雖然不容易犯型一錯誤，選取變數時卻過於保守；而以Bootstrap改良的向前逐步迴歸跟Lasso顯著性檢定一樣不容易犯型一錯誤，而選取變數上又比起Lasso顯著性檢定更大膽，因此可算是理想的方法改良結果。 / Variable selection of a regression model is an essential topic. In 1996, Tibshirani proposed a method called Lasso (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator), which completes the matter of selecting variable set while estimating the parameters. However, the original version of Lasso does not provide a way for making inference. Therefore, the significance test for lasso proposed by Lockhart et al. in 2014 is an important breakthrough. Based on the similarity of construction of statistics between Lasso significance test and forward selection method, continuing the comparisons between the two methods from Lockhart et al. (2014), we propose an improved version of forward selection method by bootstrap. And at the second half of our research, we compare the variable selection results of Lasso, Lasso significance test, forward selection, forward selection by AIC, and forward selection by bootstrap. We find that although the Type I error probability for Lasso Significance Test is small, the testing method is too conservative for including new variables. On the other hand, the Type I error probability for forward selection by bootstrap is also small, yet it is more aggressive in including new variables. Therefore, based on our simulation results, the bootstrap improving forward selection is rather an ideal variable selecting method.