The aim of the current studies was to first determine the convergent validity of several observer and self-report measures of defense mechanisms, and second to determine whether participants in the depressed and anxious groups could successfully be differentiated using observer and self-report measures of defenses. In Study 1, defensive functioning of 150 university students was assessed using the Defense-Q, Defense Mechanism Rating Scale, Defense Style Questionnaire, and the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. The results of the Pearson r analyses indicated that the defense measures were correlated in a theoretically consistent manner at the overall and defense level analyses, with the strongest relations at the mature and immature ends of the scales. Four of the 17 individual defenses were correlated in a theoretically consistent manner. In Study 2, 1182 university students completed the Personality Assessment Inventory and those scoring in the clinical range on depression or anxiety indices were selected for participation in this study. The extent to which these participants could be correctly classified into their respective groups using defense scores from the Defense-Q and the Defense Style Questionnaire was assessed using discriminant analyses. Results indicated that defense scores from both observer and self-report measures can be used to classify participants correctly into depressed and anxious groups. The Defense-Q discriminant function primarily identified depression-related defenses as important for differentiation, whereas the Defense Style Questionnaire discriminant function primarily identified anxiety-related disorders. Confirmatory stepwise discriminant analyses confirmed that the defenses previously identified in the literature were among the most effective in differentiating between the groups. The results from the present investigation identify substantial differences between the defenses assessed by observer and self-report measures and indicate that both methods can be informative for differentiating between depressed and anxious participants.

The aim of the current studies was to first determine the convergent validity of several observer and self-report measures of defense mechanisms, and second to determine whether participants in the depressed and anxious groups could successfully be differentiated using observer and self-report measures of defenses. In Study 1, defensive functioning of 150 university students was assessed using the Defense-Q, Defense Mechanism Rating Scale, Defense Style Questionnaire, and the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. The results of the Pearson r analyses indicated that the defense measures were correlated in a theoretically consistent manner at the overall and defense level analyses, with the strongest relations at the mature and immature ends of the scales. Four of the 17 individual defenses were correlated in a theoretically consistent manner. In Study 2, 1182 university students completed the Personality Assessment Inventory and those scoring in the clinical range on depression or anxiety indices were selected for participation in this study. The extent to which these participants could be correctly classified into their respective groups using defense scores from the Defense-Q and the Defense Style Questionnaire was assessed using discriminant analyses. Results indicated that defense scores from both observer and self-report measures can be used to classify participants correctly into depressed and anxious groups. The Defense-Q discriminant function primarily identified depression-related defenses as important for differentiation, whereas the Defense Style Questionnaire discriminant function primarily identified anxiety-related disorders. Confirmatory stepwise discriminant analyses confirmed that the defenses previously identified in the literature were among the most effective in differentiating between the groups. The results from the present investigation identify substantial differences between the defenses assessed by observer and self-report measures and indicate that both methods can be informative for differentiating between depressed and anxious participants.

Alterações em estruturas específicas do SNC, em particular, no sistema fronto-límbico, assim como a diminuição das células neuronais e gliais parece estar envolvida com a fisiopatologia do Transtorno do Humor Bipolar (THB). A glia exerce um importante papel no SNC, entre os quais, a produção de neurotrofinas, em especial, o Fator de Crescimento Neurotrófico derivado de Células da Glia (GDNF). Um marcado aumento dos níveis séricos de GDNF em pacientes deprimidos (F= 42.31; p=0.004; one-way ANOVA) e maníacos (F= 42.31; p=0.001; one-way ANOVA) foi demonstrado neste estudo, sugerindo um possível envolvimento desta neurotrofina com o THB. Por outro lado, alterações nos fatores neurotróficos afetam os mecanismos de plasticidade sináptica, podendo contribuir para as deficiências cognitivas apresentadas pelos pacientes. Deficiências cognitivas, em especial, as falhas de memória são descritas, as quais influenciam a funcionalidade destes indivíduos, principalmente a nível ocupacional e social. As altas taxas de disfuncionalidade apresentadas pelos pacientes e a falta de padronização dos instrumentos usados nos estudos para avaliar funcionalidade, nos levaram ao desenvolvimento de uma escala. A Escala Breve de Funcionalidade (FAST) é um instrumento de rápida e fácil aplicação desenvolvida para usar em psiquiatria, em especial, paciente com THB. A FAST avalia objetivamente seis áreas específicas da funcionalidade, tais como autonomia, trabalho, cognição, relacionamentos interpessoais, finanças e lazer. A validação da escala foi realizada através de testes psicométricos, tais como: consistência interna (alfa de Cronbach’s igual a 0.909), validade concorrente comparada com a GAF (r=-0.903; p<0.001), test-retest (0.98; p<0.01), validade em detectar diferenças entre episódios agudos (maníacos: 40.44±9.15 e deprimidos 43.21±13.34) e períodos de remissão (18.55±13.19; F=35.43; p<0.001) e análise fatorial. Os resultados obtidos foram muito positivos, tornando o instrumento válido e prontamente disponível para o uso na prática clínica e investigação. Palavras-chave: transtorno do humor bipolar, GDNF, glia, neurotrofinas, funcionalidade, disfuncionalidade, escalas de funcionalidade. / Alterations in specific structures of CNS, in particular, fronto-lymbic system, and a reduction of neurons and glial cells appear to be involved in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. Glial cells have an important role in the CNS, for example, the production of neurotrophins, especially, Glial Cell Line-derived Neurotrophic Factor (GDNF). In this study, we showed a marked increased in the serum levels of GDNF in depressive (F= 42.31; p=0.004; one-way ANOVA) and manic bipolar patients (F= 42.31; p=0.001; one-way ANOVA), which suggested that GDNF could be involved in the physiopathology of bipolar disorder. On the other hand, alterations in the neurotrophic factors hinder synaptic plasticity mechanisms, may result in cognitive impairment in bipolar patients. In particular, memory difficulties have been reported here, and these difficulties influence occupational and social functioning in these subjects. High rates of functional impairment showed by bipolar patients and a lack of standardization of the instruments available to assess functioning in the studies motivated us to development the scale. The Functioning Assessment Short test (FAST) is a rapid instrument and easy to apply developed to use in psychiatry, especially, bipolar patients. It assesses six specific domains of functioning, such as autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues and leisure time. The validation of FAST was performed by psychometric tests such as internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.909), concurrent validity compared to the GAF (r=-0.903; p<0.001), validity as a discriminative measure to detect the difference between euthymic (18.55; F=23.59; p<0.001) and acute patients (manic: 38.50; depressive: 42.38; mixed: 43.21), factorial analysis and test-retest reliability (0.953; p<0.01). The FAST scale showed strong psychometric properties and it is now available for use in both clinical practice and investigation settings.

Alterações em estruturas específicas do SNC, em particular, no sistema fronto-límbico, assim como a diminuição das células neuronais e gliais parece estar envolvida com a fisiopatologia do Transtorno do Humor Bipolar (THB). A glia exerce um importante papel no SNC, entre os quais, a produção de neurotrofinas, em especial, o Fator de Crescimento Neurotrófico derivado de Células da Glia (GDNF). Um marcado aumento dos níveis séricos de GDNF em pacientes deprimidos (F= 42.31; p=0.004; one-way ANOVA) e maníacos (F= 42.31; p=0.001; one-way ANOVA) foi demonstrado neste estudo, sugerindo um possível envolvimento desta neurotrofina com o THB. Por outro lado, alterações nos fatores neurotróficos afetam os mecanismos de plasticidade sináptica, podendo contribuir para as deficiências cognitivas apresentadas pelos pacientes. Deficiências cognitivas, em especial, as falhas de memória são descritas, as quais influenciam a funcionalidade destes indivíduos, principalmente a nível ocupacional e social. As altas taxas de disfuncionalidade apresentadas pelos pacientes e a falta de padronização dos instrumentos usados nos estudos para avaliar funcionalidade, nos levaram ao desenvolvimento de uma escala. A Escala Breve de Funcionalidade (FAST) é um instrumento de rápida e fácil aplicação desenvolvida para usar em psiquiatria, em especial, paciente com THB. A FAST avalia objetivamente seis áreas específicas da funcionalidade, tais como autonomia, trabalho, cognição, relacionamentos interpessoais, finanças e lazer. A validação da escala foi realizada através de testes psicométricos, tais como: consistência interna (alfa de Cronbach’s igual a 0.909), validade concorrente comparada com a GAF (r=-0.903; p<0.001), test-retest (0.98; p<0.01), validade em detectar diferenças entre episódios agudos (maníacos: 40.44±9.15 e deprimidos 43.21±13.34) e períodos de remissão (18.55±13.19; F=35.43; p<0.001) e análise fatorial. Os resultados obtidos foram muito positivos, tornando o instrumento válido e prontamente disponível para o uso na prática clínica e investigação. Palavras-chave: transtorno do humor bipolar, GDNF, glia, neurotrofinas, funcionalidade, disfuncionalidade, escalas de funcionalidade. / Alterations in specific structures of CNS, in particular, fronto-lymbic system, and a reduction of neurons and glial cells appear to be involved in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. Glial cells have an important role in the CNS, for example, the production of neurotrophins, especially, Glial Cell Line-derived Neurotrophic Factor (GDNF). In this study, we showed a marked increased in the serum levels of GDNF in depressive (F= 42.31; p=0.004; one-way ANOVA) and manic bipolar patients (F= 42.31; p=0.001; one-way ANOVA), which suggested that GDNF could be involved in the physiopathology of bipolar disorder. On the other hand, alterations in the neurotrophic factors hinder synaptic plasticity mechanisms, may result in cognitive impairment in bipolar patients. In particular, memory difficulties have been reported here, and these difficulties influence occupational and social functioning in these subjects. High rates of functional impairment showed by bipolar patients and a lack of standardization of the instruments available to assess functioning in the studies motivated us to development the scale. The Functioning Assessment Short test (FAST) is a rapid instrument and easy to apply developed to use in psychiatry, especially, bipolar patients. It assesses six specific domains of functioning, such as autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues and leisure time. The validation of FAST was performed by psychometric tests such as internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.909), concurrent validity compared to the GAF (r=-0.903; p<0.001), validity as a discriminative measure to detect the difference between euthymic (18.55; F=23.59; p<0.001) and acute patients (manic: 38.50; depressive: 42.38; mixed: 43.21), factorial analysis and test-retest reliability (0.953; p<0.01). The FAST scale showed strong psychometric properties and it is now available for use in both clinical practice and investigation settings.

Alterações em estruturas específicas do SNC, em particular, no sistema fronto-límbico, assim como a diminuição das células neuronais e gliais parece estar envolvida com a fisiopatologia do Transtorno do Humor Bipolar (THB). A glia exerce um importante papel no SNC, entre os quais, a produção de neurotrofinas, em especial, o Fator de Crescimento Neurotrófico derivado de Células da Glia (GDNF). Um marcado aumento dos níveis séricos de GDNF em pacientes deprimidos (F= 42.31; p=0.004; one-way ANOVA) e maníacos (F= 42.31; p=0.001; one-way ANOVA) foi demonstrado neste estudo, sugerindo um possível envolvimento desta neurotrofina com o THB. Por outro lado, alterações nos fatores neurotróficos afetam os mecanismos de plasticidade sináptica, podendo contribuir para as deficiências cognitivas apresentadas pelos pacientes. Deficiências cognitivas, em especial, as falhas de memória são descritas, as quais influenciam a funcionalidade destes indivíduos, principalmente a nível ocupacional e social. As altas taxas de disfuncionalidade apresentadas pelos pacientes e a falta de padronização dos instrumentos usados nos estudos para avaliar funcionalidade, nos levaram ao desenvolvimento de uma escala. A Escala Breve de Funcionalidade (FAST) é um instrumento de rápida e fácil aplicação desenvolvida para usar em psiquiatria, em especial, paciente com THB. A FAST avalia objetivamente seis áreas específicas da funcionalidade, tais como autonomia, trabalho, cognição, relacionamentos interpessoais, finanças e lazer. A validação da escala foi realizada através de testes psicométricos, tais como: consistência interna (alfa de Cronbach’s igual a 0.909), validade concorrente comparada com a GAF (r=-0.903; p<0.001), test-retest (0.98; p<0.01), validade em detectar diferenças entre episódios agudos (maníacos: 40.44±9.15 e deprimidos 43.21±13.34) e períodos de remissão (18.55±13.19; F=35.43; p<0.001) e análise fatorial. Os resultados obtidos foram muito positivos, tornando o instrumento válido e prontamente disponível para o uso na prática clínica e investigação. Palavras-chave: transtorno do humor bipolar, GDNF, glia, neurotrofinas, funcionalidade, disfuncionalidade, escalas de funcionalidade. / Alterations in specific structures of CNS, in particular, fronto-lymbic system, and a reduction of neurons and glial cells appear to be involved in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. Glial cells have an important role in the CNS, for example, the production of neurotrophins, especially, Glial Cell Line-derived Neurotrophic Factor (GDNF). In this study, we showed a marked increased in the serum levels of GDNF in depressive (F= 42.31; p=0.004; one-way ANOVA) and manic bipolar patients (F= 42.31; p=0.001; one-way ANOVA), which suggested that GDNF could be involved in the physiopathology of bipolar disorder. On the other hand, alterations in the neurotrophic factors hinder synaptic plasticity mechanisms, may result in cognitive impairment in bipolar patients. In particular, memory difficulties have been reported here, and these difficulties influence occupational and social functioning in these subjects. High rates of functional impairment showed by bipolar patients and a lack of standardization of the instruments available to assess functioning in the studies motivated us to development the scale. The Functioning Assessment Short test (FAST) is a rapid instrument and easy to apply developed to use in psychiatry, especially, bipolar patients. It assesses six specific domains of functioning, such as autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues and leisure time. The validation of FAST was performed by psychometric tests such as internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.909), concurrent validity compared to the GAF (r=-0.903; p<0.001), validity as a discriminative measure to detect the difference between euthymic (18.55; F=23.59; p<0.001) and acute patients (manic: 38.50; depressive: 42.38; mixed: 43.21), factorial analysis and test-retest reliability (0.953; p<0.01). The FAST scale showed strong psychometric properties and it is now available for use in both clinical practice and investigation settings.

No description available.