Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:06:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CriginaCP.pdf: 715733 bytes, checksum: f6f1ebc7609e159ce6281e77e82aa651 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-08-13 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / The present work investigates related discourse in rewriting discursive practices, at monographic works specifically at the theoretical foundation section. Focalizing some discursive strategies of voice management (direct and indirect discourse and modalization voice) we detach the introduction way and function of cited discourse. To do so, it were analyzed eighteen monographic works: nine of them final graduation works and other nine specialization works seeing that each works belonging to the same student, in two different stages, in the period from 2003 in graduation conclusion to 2005 in the end of specialization course. The data reveal that the monographic writer/student emphasizes the use of direct discourse in graduation works while in specialization works there was an emphasis at indirect speech. The analysis the way they introduce cited discourse pointed out that writer/student in graduation course such as specialization student make meaningless constructions when they do not use discendi verbs, they demonstrate difficulties inarticulate citing discourse with cited discourse. In what is related to functions of cited discourse we verify that the student/writer, in both stages or levels give emphasis to the function maintain an assertion, indicating that other s discourse serve mainly as a resource of authority just because that this function reveals the absence of a dialog between student writing and cited discourse. In a general way, the forms of other s discourse claim a form of writing that is found starting from a sequence of cited discourse in what student/writer voice in graduation and specialization comes to text surface just few times, but most of the times, the student takes other s words as they were themselves, every time there is an overlap of author/source / O presente trabalho investiga o discurso relatado em pr?ticas discursivas de retextualiza??o, na se??o de fundamenta??o te?rica de monografias produzidas por graduandos e especializados, focalizando algumas estrat?gias discursivas de gerenciamento de vozes (discurso direto, indireto e modaliza??es), destacando os modos de introdu??o e as fun??es do discurso citado. Para tanto, foram analisadas 18 monografias, sendo 9 monografias de gradua??o e 9 monografias de especializa??o, do mesmo aluno/produtor, entre o per?odo de 2003, na conclus?o da gradua??o, e 2005, no t?rmino das especializa??es. Os dados revelaram que o aluno/produtor das monografias de gradua??o privilegia o discurso direto enquanto nas monografias de especializa??o, foi usado, sobretudo, o discurso indireto. A an?lise dos modos de introdu??o do discurso citado apontou que o aluno/produtor tanto de gradua??o como de especializa??o quando n?o usa verbos de dicendi para introduzir a cita??o faz constru??es sem sentido, pois demonstra dificuldade em articular o discurso citante com o discurso citado. No tocante ?s fun??es para o discurso citado, verificamos que o aluno/produtor de ambos os n?veis privilegiam a fun??o sustentar uma afirma??o, indicando, assim, que o discurso do outro serve, principalmente, como recurso de autoridade, uma vez que essa fun??o revela a aus?ncia de di?logo com o discurso citado. De uma maneira geral, as formas de discurso do outro denunciam uma escrita que se edifica a partir de uma seq??ncia de discurso citado em que a voz do aluno/produtor de gradua??o e especializa??o surge, poucas vezes e, na maioria das vezes, esse toma as palavras do outro como suas, prevalecendo a voz do autor/fonte

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:06:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 JoseCezinaldoRB.pdf: 482596 bytes, checksum: e21a9101bcf62c7fc143b853215087cd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-08-13 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / In this study we investigate the reference to other s discourse done it through the resource of direct cited discourse at background section in monographic texts produced by university students at the last phase of final work in their graduate Letras course. This work is guided in cited/related discourse studies in Bakhtin (2004), Authier-Revuz (1990, 1998, 2004), Maingueneau (1996, 2002), Charaudeau and Maingueneau (2004); in genre approaches developed by Bakhtin (2000); Maingueneau (1996, 2002); socio-discursive interaction (BRONCKART, 1999, 2003; SCHNEUWLY, 2004; DOLZ e SCHNEUWLY, 2004) and Bazerman (2005); and also in presuppositions of Textual Linguistics presented by Charrolles (1988), Van Dijk (1997), Beaugrande and Dressier (1981), Koch and Travaglia (1993, 1995), Koch (2002, 2004) and Val (2000, 2004). We have established as aims to analyze and interpret meaning relations problems in how to articulate direct cited discourse with citing discourse and at the same time explain semantic implications that comes from that articulation that compromise text meaning, at background section in that monographic genre. The analysis, by qualitative and quantitative basis in eleven monographic works that form our corpus, gave us the opportunity to achieve and see that meaning relationships in the articulation of direct cited discourse with citing discourse show problems that may be categorized into three different groups: problems related to meaning relationships with citing discourse that comes before it, problems of meaning relationships with citing discourse that comes after it, and problems with of meaning relationships with citing discourse that come before it and at the same time with citing discourse that comes after it (i.e. in relation to both). These analysis also allow us assert that, these problems, just because they occur frequently, they affect the micro level text coherence, and they also compromise the text global meaning. The results show that students at Letras Course, even in the ending process of their course do not show the real domain in relation to some ways of direct cited discourse organization and working, and also how the ideas articulation work in the construction of relations between direct cited discourse and the citing discourse that can turn those students able to produce a text that enhance acceptable patterns / Neste estudo, investigamos a refer?ncia ao discurso do outro, feita atrav?s do recurso do discurso citado direto, na trama textual da se??o de fundamenta??o te?rica de monografias produzidas por estudantes universit?rios, em fase de conclus?o de curso de Licenciatura em Letras. A pesquisa ? orientada a partir dos estudos sobre discurso citado/relatado de Bakhtin (2004), Authier-Revuz (1990, 1998, 2004), Maingueneau (1996, 2002), Charaudeau e Maingueneau (2004), das abordagens de g?neros desenvolvidas por Bakhtin (2000); Maingueneau (1996, 2002), interacionismo s?cio-discursivo (BRONCKART, 1999, 2003; SCHNEUWLY, 2004; DOLZ e SCHNEUWLY, 2004) e Bazerman (2005); e de pressupostos da Lingu?stica do Texto apontados por Charrolles (1988), Van Dijk (1997), Beaugrande e Dressler (1981), Koch e Travaglia (1993, 1995), Koch (2002, 2004) e Val (2000, 2004). Foram estabelecidos como objetivos analisar e interpretar problemas de rela??es de sentido na articula??o do discurso citado direto com o discurso citante e explicitar implica??es decorrentes desses problemas para a constru??o do sentido da trama textual da se??o de fundamenta??o te?rica do g?nero monogr?fico. A an?lise, de base qualitativa e quantitativa, das 11 monografias que constituem o corpus, permitiu-nos constatar que os problemas de rela??es de sentido na articula??o do discurso citado direto com o discurso citante podem ser caracterizados a partir de tr?s agrupamentos: problemas de rela??es de sentido com o discurso citante que lhe antecede, problemas de rela??es de sentido com o discurso citante que lhe sucede e problemas de rela??es de sentido com o discurso citante que lhe antecede e, simultaneamente, com o discurso citante que lhe sucede. Permitiu-nos constatar, ainda, que esses problemas, dada a recorr?ncia com que ocorrem, afetam a coer?ncia no n?vel da micro estrutura textual e prejudicam a constru??o do sentido global do texto. As conclus?es demonstram, portanto, que o estudante do curso de Letras, mesmo estando em fase de conclus?o de curso, n?o tem dom?nio acerca de determinados modos de organiza??o e funcionamento do discurso citado direto e do trabalho de articula??o das id?ias no tecer da rela??o entre o discurso citado direto e o discurso citante que o habilite ? produ??o de um texto que atenda aos padr?es aceit?veis